spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
23.7 C
Sringeri
Thursday, May 16, 2024
Home Blog Page 2633

All over the world, liberals live in their own echo chamber

0
Liberals Echo Chamber

This recent article by Minhaz Merchant is the type of hard hitting article on the ‘liberal’ media all over the world that is really needed.  Even though many in the media in the USA have admitted that they have been clueless about what really the people at large think, they have not followed this admission through in their writings.  Here is an admission from Paul Krugman:

“What we do know is that people like me, and probably like most readers of The New York Times, truly didn’t understand the country we live in. We thought that our fellow citizens would not, in the end, vote for a candidate so manifestly unqualified for high office, so temperamentally unsound, so scary yet ludicrous.”

(Source: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016/the-unknown-country?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur)

This was right after the elections, as the results were coming in.  What I have read Krugman since, I am not sure if this has fully sunk into him.

This paragraph is a clear indication that the ‘liberals’ are living in an echo chamber where not only do they exclusively hear their own voices, but also prevent other voices from ‘polluting’ their atmosphere.

In September 2011, Swapan Dasgupta wrote

“I recall an NRI who had lived some 26 years in a small town in southern USA turning livid when he heard me argue that President George W. Bush had a lot of popular backing for his politics. “I have not a single person who ever voted for Bush”, he informed me. When I suggested that his social experiences were limited, he took very serious umbrage.”

(Source – http://www.swapan55.com/2011/09/modi-proves-his-critics-wrong.html)

In the same article Dasgupta narrated that the situation in Bharat is no different:

“A friend of mine with a high media profile proclaimed grandly that she hadn’t met a single person who was supportive of Modi’s new campaign. “We have to draw the line somewhere,” she said grandly. Modi’s supporters “aren’t the types you can invite into your home”.

Then we have the following in an arrogant and pompous letter to the Trump:

“We will set higher standards for ourselves than ever before. We credit you with highlighting serious and widespread distrust in the media across the political spectrum. Your campaign tapped into that, and it was a bracing wake-up call for us. We have to regain that trust. And we’ll do it through accurate, fearless reporting, by acknowledging our errors and abiding by the most stringent ethical standards we set for ourselves.”

(Source – An open letter to Trump from the US press corps-http://www.cjr.org/covering_trump/trump_white_house_press_corps.php)

Is the editor of the journal so blind to really understand the import of what she has written?  Is this not a shameless admission about their own lack of professionalism.  Did it really require a rise of Trump to come to this realisation?  It is no wonder that Obama said that Democrats are characterized as ‘coastal, latte-sipping, liberals, politically-correct, out-of-touch’.  A characterisation of the ‘liberals’ all over America.  It is a real tragedy that there is no introspection of this characterization – I could understand that if it was dismissed if it had come from Trump.

Some liberals in the mainstream media in the USA had written during the election campaign wondering if their abuse of Trump is not actually working in his favour.  This is now being echoed a little bit more, like Krugman has.  But still, as Merchant writes in the referenced article, that there is still an attempt to pretend to be clueless.

Again, as Merchant has written, there are huge parallels about the abuse by the liberal media all over the world of the abuses that has been heaped on Modi in Bharat and Trump in the USA.  (The only difference is that Modi ignores these abuses and continues to concentrate on what he has promised to do as the prime minister.)   The Economist, an English weekly from the UK, went to the extreme extent of telling the people of Bharat that they should actually be voting for Rahul Gandhi as the prime minister.  This shows the extent of the cluelessness of the English media all over the world when it comes to issues relating to Bharat.  The tragedy is that in these last thirty months there is no sign that this media has even come to the beginning of the realization and the introspection that they are expected to do.  This applies as much to the Bharatiya media as much to the Bharatiya correspondents of the foreign media.

I am of the view that a dynamic media is an essential component of a vibrant democracy.  But it is for the media to demonstrate their own dynamism.  The social media will point out to whenever the media has gone astray.  By its very nature, the language in the social media will never conform to the norms of Queen’s English – you see this in the response of the liberals on the same forum.  But concentrating on the language rather than the message is the strategy, because they know that the message is strong and that they will have to accept that their agenda has no merit.  And they will have to work really hard to be relevant.

There are many journalists and analysts in Bharat who claim that they are part of a newly created category of right-of-centre – people who have jumped on the bandwagon created by those whom they label variously as Internet Hindus, preachy, buffoonish, trolls. etc.  (Incidentally, those who are so labelled actually embraced the labels as a badge of honour, which hugely infuriates those who toss the labels as a derogatory term.)  These members of the right-of-center should understand that relentless presence of these Internet Hindus was the real reason for the coming of the present NDA government in power.  Yes, the government has promised development, but they have also promised issues that are an important part of the ideology of Hindutva.  Issues that the Internet Hindus do not at all see as incompatible with development – in fact they see development incomplete without these issues.  Also the Hindutva issues are not anti-anyone – they are just pro the Hindus.

P.S.

Probably the first article in mainstream English media, albeit from Canada, on the Internet Hindus was written by Jason Overdroff in June 2012 titled “India: Meet the ‘Internet Hindus’” and available at: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/india/120615/internet-hindus-hindu-nationalists-right-wing-politics

I also think it is the only honest attempt to deal with the subject in a professional manner.


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Special Category State Vs Special Package for Development- Andhra Pradesh

0
Special Category State

The concept of a special category state was first introduced in 1969 when the 5th Finance Commission sought to provide certain disadvantaged states with preferential treatment in the form of central assistance and tax breaks. The National Development Council accorded the special category status to states if they met certain conditions like:

  • Hilly and difficult terrain
  • Low population density or sizable tribal population
  • Strategic location along borders with neighbouring countries
  • Economic and infrastructural backwardness
  • Non-viable nature of state finances

Award of special category status provides for the following benefits (under the Revised Gadgil-Mukherjee formula:)

  • 30% of NCA (Normal Central Assistance) to states go to the 11 special category states (SCS), while the remaining states get 70% of the allocation
  • Nature of transfers of NCA is in the form of 90% grant and 10% loan for special category states, while for other states it is 30% grant and 70% loan
  • SCA (Special Central Assistance) for projects is in the form of 90% grants and 10% loan – the untied special central assistance is up to 100% grant given only to special category states
  • Assistance for externally aided projects with grant-loan ratio 90:10
  • The matching contribution in respect of centrally sponsored schemes is usually lower for Special Category states, for e.g. in AIBP (Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme) central share is 90% for special category while it is 25% for other states.
  • Beyond additional plan resources, special category states can enjoy concessions in excise and customs duties, income tax rates and corporate tax rates as determined by the government.

However, these benefits have been progressively diluted in the following ways:

  • The loan component of the normal central assistance has been removed since 2005-06 and NCA is given entirely as grant to all states. This has reduced the share of NCA for SCS to around 56% (earlier 70%).
  • Further, NCA has reduced to account for merely 15% of central plan assistance, as there was a proliferation of centrally sponsored schemes, thereby diluting the benefit of untied grants to states
  • With the increase in tax devolution share from 32% to 42% of divisible pool of central taxes, the centre has dispensed with NCA, SCA and special plan assistance from 2015-16 onwards.

There are very few externally aided projects for special category states and the centre has drastically reduced allocations under AIBP in the budget 2015-16. Further the benefits of lower matching contributions to SCS are unlikely to be substantial, as central assistance to state plans has reduced by over 40% in 2015-16.

In 2013, a committee under Dr. Raghuram Rajan was constituted to recommend on the demand of special status to Bihar. Recommendations of the committee were:

1. The SCS and SCS seeking states to be provided more fund and special attention.
2. The demand is political oriented rather than development oriented
3. The demand is not politically feasible as more states will start demanding.
4. The demand is not economically feasible as center has reduced the externally aided programs.
5. So it will better for states to come with demand of special package for special problem.

In the light of increasing demands by states such as Bihar, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh for ‘special category’ status, the 14th finance commission has recommended its discontinuation in its report on sharing of finances between centre and states. Therefore, the centre has dispensed with the NCA, SCA and special plan assistance from 2015-16 onwards.

Over the years, the effectiveness of Special category status is found not so progressive as majority of the states designated under the special category states have not improved their performance significantly despite the funding support from the centre.

“Even though the number of special category states increased from only three in 1969 to 11 in 2001, its kitty of 30% of the central plan funds, after setting aside funds for externally aided projects and special area programmes in certain states, remained unchanged – there was no proportionate increase in resources set out for this category as new states were added on. As a result, the share of individual states within the category had to decline..” (The reality of special category states– Mr. Govind Bhattacharjee, Director General at the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of Bharat in New Delhi. Published in Economic & political Weekly, October 4, 2014. )

A review of the performance of the 11 states that have been accorded special category on select parameters like GSDP, infant mortality rate, poverty, unemployment and literacy indicates the following rankings:

GSDP Rankings, 2014-15

Special category states

GSDP Ranking

Arunachal Pradesh

30

Assam

19

Manipur

29

Meghalaya

26

Mizoram

32

Nagaland

28

Tripura

25

Sikkim

31

Jammu & Kashmir

21

Himachal Pradesh

22

Uttarkhand

20

(Source: http://statisticstimes.com/economy/gdp-of-indian-states.php)

Estimated Infant mortality rate, 2013

Special category states

Infant mortality rate

Arunachal Pradesh

32

Assam

54

Manipur

10

Meghalaya

47

Mizoram

35

Nagaland

18

Tripura

26

Sikkim

22

Jammu & Kashmir

37

Himachal Pradesh

35

Uttarkhand

32

(Source-http://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/SRS%20Bulletin%20-Sepetember%202014.pdf)

% of people below the poverty line as on 16th September, 2016.

Special category states

% of people below poverty line

Rank

Arunachal Pradesh

34.67

25

Assam

31.98

22

Manipur

36.89

26

Meghalaya

11.87

11

Mizoram

20.87

18

Nagaland

18.88

16

Tripura

14.05

12

Sikkim

8.19

4

Jammu & Kashmir

10.35

7

Himachal Pradesh

8.06

3

Uttarkhand

11.26

9

Bharat

21.92

NA

(Source:  “Table 162, Number and Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line”. Reserve Bank of India, Government of India. 2013.)
 States ranked by unemployment

Special category states

Unemployment Rates 2015-16 (per 1000) Total

Urban

Rural

Rank

Arunachal Pradesh

89

52

93

6

Assam

61

101

55

13

Manipur

57

70

49

16

Meghalaya

48

134

28

19

Mizoram

30

49

15

24

Nagaland

85

141

69

7

Tripura

197

172

203

1

Sikkim

181

168

184

2

Jammu & Kashmir

72

36

83

10

Himachal Pradesh

106

23

117

4

Uttarkhand

70

32

81

12

Bharat

50

49

51

 NA
(Source:  “Report on Fifth Annual Employment-Unemployment Survey (2015-16)” (PDF). Ministry of Labour and Employment. p. 120.).

Ranking by literacy rates (2011 Census)

Special category states

Literacy rate %

Male literacy rate %

Female literacy rate %

Rank

Arunachal Pradesh

66.95

73.69

59.57

34

Assam

73.18

78.81

67.27

26

Manipur

79.85

86.49

73.17

16

Meghalaya

75.48

77.17

73.78

24

Mizoram

91.58

93.72

89.40

3

Nagaland

80.11

83.29

76.89

15

Tripura

87.75

92.18

83.15

4

Sikkim

82.20

87.29

76.43

13

Jammu & Kashmir

68.74

78.26

58.01

30

Himachal Pradesh

83.78

90.83

76.60

11

Uttarkhand

79.63

88.33

70.70

17

Bharat

74.04

82.14

65.46

NA

(Source:  “Ranking of states and union territories by literacy rate: 2011” (PDF). Government of India.)

The special category status does not contain any specific targets/mile stones to be achieved through the funding assistance provided under the special category, nor any time lines for the same. Therefore, understandably central govt’s funding assistance to the states has gradually shifted from the earlier outlay approach to outcome linked approach which favours awarding special packages meant for specific programmes/projects rather than continuing the extant mechanism of special category status. The 14th Finance Commission has only formalized this mechanism by putting the last nail in the coffin.

AP is currently left with no choice other than the special package. The proposed special development package mentioned in the AP Reorganization Act, if felt as not adequate (and rightly so), then the state can take up the matter with centre and request to enhance the same, considering the circumstances under which the state bifurcation has taken place.

It is prudent for the Andhra Pradesh State Government to negotiate with the Centre to implement the commitments made under the AP State Reorganisation Act in letter and spirit and get additional funds over and above the commitment made under the Reorganisation Act in order to address the issues in backward regions like Rayalaseema and North Andhra.

In September 2016, the Central Government announced tax rebates for seven districts of Andhra Pradesh (notified as backward areas) — Anantapur, Chittoor, Cuddapah, Kurnool, Srikakulam, Vishakhapatnam and Vizianagaram, under the Andhra Pradesh Re-organisation Act, 2014. This tax rebate covers 15 per cent of higher additional depreciation and 15 per cent of investment allowance on the cost of plant and machinery acquired by any manufacturing undertaking setup during the period 1st April 2015 to 31st March 2020 in these seven districts. There is a need to extend this period to 10 years in view of the fact that the newly formed Andhra Pradesh state does not have any existing industrial corridor or a state capital.

AP is now ranking in number 1 slot (jointly with Telangana) in terms of ease of doing business among the 29 states in Bharat as per the recent World Bank study. In the present liberalised world, no country feels that it cannot develop since it is lacking financial resources for development. Finance is one of the important resources and not the only resource. AP has abundant natural resources (which ironically has gone against the state in getting special category status) and it only needs capital to augment these natural resources to develop the state.

Therefore AP needs to continue its efforts on providing investor friendly climate by framing a long term policy, ensuring good governance on one side to attract investors from Bharat and abroad, and on the other side keep negotiating with the Centre to obtain a commitment on the release of the quantum of funds for the specified purposes/projects in a time bound manner for a period of at least 10 years. No doubt this is a tight rope walk but the state has a Chief Minister who is a master in this craft.

– B.N.V.Parthasarathi

(Ex Senior Banker, Management and Financial Consultant, Visiting faculty at premier B Schools and Universities. E mail- [email protected])

(Featured Image Credit: india.com)

(Disclaimer: This article represents the opinions of the Author, and the Author is responsible for ensuring the factual veracity of the content. HinduPost will not be responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information, contained herein.)


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Two more train sabotage attempts averted – where are Pak apologists?

1
Train Sabotage

Two more shocking cases of railway track sabotage have been reported in the last 48 hours. In both cases, major tragedies were averted due to alertness of railway patrolling staff and the train driver.

While the earlier cases of sabotage in the last few months involved cutting the tracks with gas cutter and removing fish plates, or placing improvised explosive devices, the new modus operandi is much simpler but equally deadly – placing stone/iron slabs on the track.

One sabotage attempt occurred last night near Diva station, Mumbai when a 15 feet long rail piece was put on the track. Drivers of the 12052 Janshatabdi Express stopped the train in time –

The other disaster was averted near Samastipur in Bihar when two railway patrolmen found two stone slabs, each around one meter long, kept on the UP Line track on minor bridge no. 20. When the patrolmen tried to remove the slabs, 3-4 persons who were hiding came out and started abusing them. The patrolmen then rushed to inform the Dalsinghsarai RPF post, GRP and local police.

The worst train tragedy in recent memory occurred on November 20, 2016, when 147 people died while over 180 were injured after 14 coaches of Patna-Indore Express derailed in Kanpur Dehat district, UP. Three men were arrested by Bihar police for their involvement in this train accident – they have confessed to working at the behest of Pakistan’s ISI via handlers in Nepal and Dubai. Nepal police have also arrested one man who has corroborated this confession.

The number of known railway track sabotages stands at 5 in just the last 4 months

  • 1 Oct 2016 – pressure cooker bomb near Motihari, Bihar was detected at the last minute.
  • 20 November, 2016 – Patna-Indore Express derailed in Kanpur Dehat after fish plates and metal clips removed
  • 31 Dec 2016 – unidentified men damaged railway tracks in Mandhna near Kanpur.
  • 23 Jan 2017 – Stone slabs placed on track in Barauni-Samastipur section, Bihar
  • 25 Jan 2017 – 15 feet rail line placed on track near Diva, Mumbai.

The situation is so grave that the Rail Minister has himself tweeted for extra vigilance from railway staff and citizens –

But what is most shocking is the almost complete silence in MSM on these murderous terrorist attempts which threaten the vast rail network used by millions of Bharatiyas daily. The same media which should be carrying news of these dastardly attacks to the common people to raise awareness and put pressure on the terror network behind this, instead seems to be waiting for accidents to occur so they can take potshots at the Rail Minister and by extension the Modi Government.

It does not take rocket science to deduce the mastermind behind these spate of sabotage attempts – Pakistan’s ISI. Bharat has long been at the receiving end of a 30-year-old jihad waged by the State of Pakistan under their ‘death by a 1000 cuts’ doctrine, and the chief enforcer of this dastardly terror strategy is Pakistan’s premier spy agency ISI. What started as cross-border infiltration by trained terrorists evolved to bomb blasts carried out in connivance with underworld criminals, nurturing terror outfits within Bharat like SIMI and IM (Indian Mujahideen), serial blasts on trains/ public places etc, terror attacks by gunmen who came from Pakistan via boats – ISI has shown that it is a deadly foe with zero moral limits and with constantly evolving tactics.

Seeing the spate of ISI and ISIS modules that security agencies have busted since the Modi Government came to power, it is likely that ISI and their supporters within Bharat have realized that it is too risky to build organized terror modules and then arm them with sophisticated weapons. Rather, they have decided to opt for simple, low-risk terror tactics like sabotaging rail lines. Even in Europe, we have seen how terror groups have opted to strike using lone wolves who crash buses into innocent civilians or attack with knives etc.

It is also possible that there are radical Islamist & Maoist elements within Bharat who are acting out of their own volition copying the ISI tactics – this has to be tackled by clamping down on Wahabbi/Salafi radicalization in madrassa/mosques across the nation which has seen a huge increase during the UPA era.

Better surveillance by railways and security agencies, vigilance by citizens and quick, severe punishment to the perpetrators is one part of tackling this terror threat. The only permanent solution is to take the fight to the enemy’s doorstep. Bharat has taken the first important step in that direction through the Sept 2016 surgical strikes conducted against terrorist camps in PoK – it was a welcome move that junked the failed ‘strategic restraint’ theory peddled by Lutyens’ insiders. But as expected, that one act was never going to be enough to deter the evil deep state in Pakistan which is controlled by fantical Islamist fundamentalists. We need a sustained campaign to target the Pakistani deep state inside their homes to make them realize the costs associated with promoting terror in Bharat.

And obviously, we need to snap all ties with Pakistan and declare it as a terrorist state to send a clear signal to the global community that we mean business.Anything short of this is just beating around the bush and setting ourselves up for more confused knee-jerk reactions.The world did not defeat Nazi Germany through half-baked measures or Neville Chamberlain type appeasement. It is time to claim the higher moral ground and deal with Pakistan like the evil, Islamo-fascist nation it is.


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Karnataka Congress Ensures that Party Remains Synonymous with Corruption

0
Congress Siddaramaiah conversion cow slaughter Karnataka

The income tax department has detected undisclosed assets worth over Rs. 162 crore and seized Rs. 41 lakh cash, besides over a dozen kilogram in gold and jewellery during searches on the premises of a Karnataka minister and state Mahila Congress chief.

Officials said the department has also got inputs about a number of ‘benami’ assets and ‘unexplained investments’ during the searches at the premises of small scale industries minister Ramesh L. Jarkiholi and Mahila Congress president Laxmi R Hebbalkar in Gokak, Belgaum and Bengaluru last week.

The searches followed allegations of tax evasion. Both Jarkiholi and Hebbalkar were not available for comments. “The searches led to the admission of undisclosed income of Rs 162.06 crore and unexplained cash amounting to Rs 41 lakh, besides 12.8 kg gold and jewellery. Many people who had large incomes and investments were found not to be filing I-T returns and the probe in the case is going on,” they said.

The searches, they said, were launched on 19 January to probe allegations of tax evasion in the sugar business apparently run by groups associated with the duo. The investigators, official said, found “huge unexplained cash deposits” had been made in the bank accounts of their family members and associates, and in benami names in primary cooperative societies which were transferred to business entities engaged in sugar manufacturing.

“It was also detected that non-existent persons have been made share holders and investors in one of the sugar companies. Evidences of creation of bogus assets and siphoning off money from the company through various concerns engaged in turn-key projects for setting up sugar factories have also been gathered,” they said.

The IT department official said, entry operators, people who facilitate in hawala-like transactions, were involved in making huge deposits in banks which were routed through various intermediaries to escape the tax net. The department has also issued summonses to a number of people allegedly involved in the case to take the probe forward, they said.

(Source: LiveMint.com)

No Outrage Over Continued Congress Corruption

In Dec 2016, IT sleuths had unearthed around Rs 150 crore in unaccounted property and cash – Rs 5.7 crore was in new notes of Rs 2,000 – at the palatial residences of two state government engineers, Chikkarayappa and SC Jayachandra, considered close to PWD minister Dr HC Mahadevappa and CM Siddaramaiah. The two engineers landed plum posts in the government despite  previous charges of corruption against them. The arrests had sparked some rare introspection in the grand old party, with veteran Congress leader and former Union minister B Janardhana Poojary expressing anguish over the arrests, “Who is their big boss? It could even be the chief minister himself.

Allegations of conflict of interest were also levelled against the CM after a private diagnostic firm, Matrix Imaging Solutions Pvt Ltd, in which his son Yathindra was a director, bagged a tender to establish a lab at Bangalore Medical College Research Institute. There was also an uproar over a Hublot wristwatch worth Rs 70 lakhs worn by the CM, a self-proclaimed socialist.

There have been serious charges of harassment by Karnataka Congress leaders like ex-Home Minister KJ George and Labor Minister PT Parameshwar Naik which caused the suicide of 2 senior police officers and resignation of 1 lady officer. Law & order has witnessed a sharp deterioration with attacks on women and targeting of Hindu activists by jehadis becoming common place.

But despite all this, the Siddaramaiah regime which is fully backed by Sonia Gandhi’s High Command, has escaped scrutiny by media. This is in sharp contrast to the way BS Yedyurappa was hounded day and night for corruption allegations during his stormy 3 year CM term. At that time, the Governor of Karnataka HR Bhardwaj (an old Nehru-Gandhi loyalist) had turned Raj Bhavan into a virtual Congress officer, acting as the brazen facilitator of the ‘secular’ attack on the first ‘communal’ Government in South Bharat. Quiescent BJP Delhi leaders had also played their part in the hounding of BSY.

Free pass to ‘Secular’ Corruption

In Dec 2016, an India Today investigation had exposed Congress leader Tariq Siddiqui, sitting in AICC Headquarters in New Delhi, as willing to launder black money into white for a commission, after demonetization. Senior leaders of SP, NCP, BSP and JDU were also found to be playing touts for the illegal currency trade right in the heart of the national capital.

That corruption is integral to ‘secular’ politics is a hard fact, but the issue hardly ever gets highlighted. Media and our intelligentsia prefer to tar all politicians with the corruption brush, and take special pleasure in highlighting any corruption allegation against BJP leaders. The goal is to ensure that BJP doesn’t get credit for running cleaner, less nepotistic and more efficient Governments than their ‘secular’ adversaries like Congress, SP, NCP, TMC etc.

Many Hindus too get taken in by this ‘hamam mein sab nange hain‘ (loosely translated as ‘all parties are naked in the political arena’) line immortalized by the Lutyens’ journalist Rajdeep Sardesai. But any objective analysis will show that BJP leaders on average are less susceptible to corruption and BJP Governments offer better governance, compared to ‘secular’ politicians. The reasons for this are not hard to fathom – 1.) BJP has no captive caste or minority votebank, and hence has to abide by the ‘perform or perish’ mantra to a greater degree 2.) The RSS roots of BJP ensure that it regularly gets seeded with leaders from humble backgrounds (ML Khattar, Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Modi etc) who are committed to nationalist ideology.

The very fact that corruption is no longer a headline issue, unlike the UPA-2 term when scams were breaking every other day, shows the marked improvement in governance. Media bias is exposed by the way most of their shrill criticism of Modi sarkar revolves around intangibles like freedom of expression or alleged oppression of minorities and backwards, and not core governance issues.

The harsh reality for the aam admi of Bharat is that Congress and their ‘secular’ clones  offer nothing but corruption, nepotistic and shoddy governance devoid of any larger vision.


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

History of Tamils – An analysis exposing the lies of Dravidianists

8
Tamils History
ARULMIGU KOODAL AZHAGAR PERUMAL TEMPLE, MADURAI This temple hails from the earliest Age of Sangam period. There are references of this temple in Paripadal and Silappadikaram. The presiding deity was praised and worshipped by the Sangam tamil Poets as the president and guardian deity of the Sangam and called him by the name "Thuvarikoman" (the King who ruled over from Dwaraka) and Koodal Alagar.

The Dravidian movement of south Bharat, especially Tamil Nadu needs no lengthy introduction. It is based on the false notion that Brahmins and other upper castes are Aryans who migrated from northern parts of the country, enslaved the native Dravidians and exploited them by making the natives follow their religion. The Dravidianist anti-Brahmanism which has in turn manifested itself into anti-Hinduism is dangerous for many attacks on temples, directly or indirectly, have been reported ever since the Dravidian movement gained momentum and hence it must be refuted.

One of the major accusation of the members who started this Dravidian movement was that Brahmins openly exploited the Dalits and people belonging to other lower castes and that ancient Tamils were not followers of Vedic religion and did not worship the Vedic  Gods. Since Dravidian movement more or less revolves around Tamils and Tamil is the oldest properly recorded Dravidian language, we concentrate on Tamil here.

The earliest recorded Tamil era is known as the Sangam age, this period lasted from around 500-300 BCE to 300 CE. Early Sangam age Tamil kings were staunch followers of Vedic religion. Pandyan king Palyagasalai Muthukudumi Peuvazhuthi held the title ‘Palyagasalai’ since he built many sacrificial halls and performed Vedic rituals. Another king named Rajasuyam Vetta Perunrakilli held the title for performing the royal Vedic Rajasuya ritual. In old Sangam era Tamil poem Purananuru 6 & in Pathitruppathu 63, it is mentioned that Tamil kings bowed their heads down only in front of their Vedic Brahmin Gurus.

Sangam age Pandyan coin feauting Vedic Yajna, from the book ‘A Catalogue of the Sangam Age Pandya and Chola Coins’ in the National Museum, Colombo, Sri Lanka by by R. Krishnamurthy & Senarath Wickramasinghe.

Another old Tamil poem from Ainkurunuru 62 mentions a festival dedicated to Vedic God Indra. Further, Tolkappiyam, the oldest Tamil grammatical work also mentions Vedic God Varuna and the name Tol-kappiyam itself is derived from Sanskrit term kavya. Also, Sangam era poems like Akananuru 70 & Purananuru 378 mention Ramayana themes. This totally contradicts the claim of the leaders of Dravidian movement and establishes the fact that Tamils praised and worshipped the valour of Rama and were also staunch followers of Vedic religion.

Lord Murugan (known as Skanda or Kartikeya in Sanskrit) who was and is popular among Tamils and is regarded as the native God of Tamils also had northern origins. The earliest depictions of Murugan or Skanda is found in northern art. Sangam poem Paripadal mentions that birth of Murugan took place in northern Himalayas. Thus it is clear that Vedic Hindu elements had strong presence in Tamil lands during Sangam age.

Sculpture of Murugan or Skanda from Gandhara, dated to Kushana period. Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kumara,_The_Divine_General_LACMA_M.85.279.3.jpg (During this same period we have no depictions of Murugan from south)

This is also further evidence from archaeological finds. Noted archaeologist Dilip K Chakrabarti in his book Battle for Ancient India writes the following in page 109:

“Period I of Alagukalam has red ware, black-and-red ware, mat-design pottery, NBP and grey ware and its dominant pottery is black and red ware. There is no radio carbon date from the level, and the excavators’ chronology puts it between 500 BC and 300 BC. I think that there is enough justification to put it between the bracket 700/800 BCE to 400 BCE. The NBP occurs in the upper level and may be put anywhere between 500 and 400 BCE.”

This NBP or Northern Black Polished Ware culture was the material culture of northern Gangetic Janapadas. The presence of NBPW in Tamilkam during early Sangam age, i.e 500-400 BCE, indicates that Tamils back then adopted same culture as the northern Janapadas. Black and red ware or BRW culture was also found in north during the Iron age.  Also the Pandyans had issued punch-marked coins which were associated with the northern Janapadas. Further, many early southern coins have typical Dharmic symbols like Svastika, Sirvatsa, Nandipada etc along with other symbols found in northern coins and art. This indicates that early Tamil statehood and currency system was adopted from north. Also, Tamils in early period used Brahmi writing system, same as in north. Many Tamil Brahmi inscriptions show borrowings from northern Prakrit languages as well.

Pandyan punch-marked coins  from the book  ‘Sangam age Tamil coins’ by R. Krishnamurthy

Sangam age Tamil poems like Purananuru  132 treat the lands from Himalayas to southern Kanyakumari as one entity. Parthitrupathu makes mention of Chera king Chenguttuvan washing the idol of Kannagi in sacred waters of Ganga in north. Also the Kalinga king Kharavela speaks of conquering Tamil kingdoms when he conquered regions of Bharatavarsha in his Hathigumpha inscription contradicting the populars claim of Dravidianists, that ancient Tamils considering only the land of Dravida (From sapthagiri hills of Tirumala to Kanyakumari) as their own, and did not rule any places beyond that while they agree that Cholas had their prominence in the lands of Vietnam, Malaysia etc. When Cholas were successful in capturing distant lands like Malaysia, is it possible that they never conquered other places to the north of Tirumala but only fought some battles and made Kings pay an amount as tribute on their victory instead of ruling those conquered places?

Thus all this evidence shows that the unity of north and south Bharat under same Dharmic culture existed at least for 2500 years. Since the earliest recorded culture of Tamils was already under Dharmic influence, we can say that Tamils were Dharmic Hindus since time imemorial and ancient cultural elements like Jallikattu which has been described in both Srimad Bhagavatham and Naalaayira Divya Prabandam while reciting the story of Krishna’s marriage with Nagnajiti (Nappinnai), was also practiced by Tamil Hindus back then.

(Featured Image Credit: ARULMIGU KOODAL AZHAGAR PERUMAL TEMPLE, MADURAI – This temple hails from the earliest Age of Sangam period. There are references of this temple in Paripadal and Silappadikaram. The first 10 songs of naalaayira divyaprabhandam called thiruppallaandu is dedicated to the lord there. The presiding deity was praised and worshipped by the Sangam tamil Poets as the president and guardian deity of the Sangam and called him by the name “Thuvarikoman” (the King who ruled over from Dwaraka) and Koodal Alagar. http://www.alagarkoil.tnhrce.in/tour.html)

(This article was jointly written by @Dauhshanti & @paanchajanyaa)


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Is Hindu Cremation The Next Target For Environment NGOs and Secular Politics?

4
Hindu Cremation

Imran Hussain, the Delhi Environment Minister and AAP leader, has written a letter to the Centre asking for a standardised policy on green crematoria as “cremation alone accounts considerably to air pollution“.

In his letter, Hussain said that banning the use of wood in crematoria and switching to electric or CNG mode does not appear to be a tenable solution because of religious beliefs, and mentioned that his Government has tasked CSIR National Environment Engineering Research Institute with the work of creating engineering designs for creating non-polluting crematoria.

While steps for controlling environmental pollution are generally laudable, what is interesting is the Minister’s assertion that Hindu cremation using wood pyres contributes ‘considerably’ to air pollution. Most studies on Delhi’s air pollution problem conducted in recent years paint a different picture –

  • A 2011 study commissioned by Union Government found road dust (particulate matter from paved and unpaved roads) and industrial emissions as the prominent causes of air pollution in metros. CSE however countered the findings alleging that the study was underplaying the role of polluting diesel vehicles.
  • This independent site urbanemissions.info says that vehicle exhaust, industries, road dust, waste burning, biomass burning (open seasonal fires, cooking and heating) and diesel generators as main causes of pollution.

The same Imran Hussain was at forefront in asking Delhi residents to “celebrate a cracker-free Diwali” last year. Earlier, two CPM ministers in Kerala had raised their voice against Hindu practices – Public Works Minister G Sudhakaran said that it was inappropriate to do lamp lighting ceremony to inaugurate public or school functions, while Health minister KK Shailaja had objected to Sanskrit shlokas chanted during the International Yoga Day on 21 June.

Silent Assault of the Secular State on Hindus

It is evident that there are far bigger challenges to overcome on the pollution front – Hindu crematoriums are no where near a major factor. Then why is the Delhi Government and even a statutory body like NGT (National Green Tribunal) so obsessed with cremations? Last year, an NGT bench headed by justice UD Salvi said alternatives like electricity, compressed natural gas and petroleum natural gas to perform the final rites should be considered. NGT had also imposed a fine of Rs 5 crore on Art of Living for allegedly damaging Yamuna floodplains by hosting the World Culture Festival – NGT’s relative silence on much graver damage caused by dumping of toxic waste and land grabbing, exposing the campaign against AOL as nothing short of a witchhunt against a Hindu organization.

NGT is a parallel court that was created by Sonia Gandhi’s UPA regime in 2010 – it was another brainchild of the super-cabinet NAC headed by Sonia that ensured civil society pressure groups/NGO lobby had the final say on most policy decisions of the UPA 1 & 2 Governments. The inside story of how this shadowy NAC cabal dominated by Hinduphobic left-liberals like Harsh Mander, Aruna Roy, Farah Naqvi etc. actually worked is only now coming out.

This is the lasting legacy of Sonia Gandhi – introduction of sectarian anti-Hindu laws like RTE, creating an entitlement-based debilitating work culture through schemes like MNREGA, and setting up parallel courts like NGT, NCMEI etc modelled as tribunals with opaque rules and dominated by civil society activists connected to FCRA – NGOs.

This is not what the framers of our Constitution envisioned when they created the balance of power between the three arms of executive, legislature and judiciary. As this cogent criticism of this tribunalisation phenomenon explains –

“Away from the real or perceived friction between the executive and the judiciary, it is widespread tribunalisation which is slowly eating away core judicial functions, thereby denuding real courts and imperiling actual independence of the judiciary. Even the Prime Minister’s very valid and introspective question last year on the desirability of tribunalisation has failed to dent our complacent thought process. And it seems that many in the judiciary and government also are not keen to rock the boat for the concept provides comfortable post retirement sinecure.”

Repealing unnecessary institutions like NGT, NCMEI etc which were introduced by distorting the original nature of the Constitution, should be high on the agenda of any nationalist Government. That should also be part of the “Minimum Government, Maximum Governance” goal.

Motivated Parties Conduct ‘Studies’ To Target Hindu Traditions

In 2013, the UK newspaper Telegraph had published an article based on ‘research’ by one Shamsh Pervez to claim ‘Indian funeral pyres and incense ‘melting glaciers’. No one in MSM questioned the validity of this ‘research’ – it was left unchallenged until social media picked it up and revealed the biases of the said ‘researcher’ Shamsh Pervez.

This is not to say that Hindu rituals cannot change with time – there are practising Hindus who have no problem with electric cremation indoors, just as there are many Hindus who prefer group firework displays on Diwali. But what is non-negotiable is that Hindu beliefs matter – if some Hindu prefer a traditional wood pyre funeral in the open like Shri Davender Ghai who fought a 4-year battle in UK to win exactly that right in 2010, then those sentiments must be respected…at least in Bharat. Hindus are open to debate, but denigration of our beliefs or applying Abrahamic standards to judge our traditions will be resisted fiercely.

As YugaParivartan says in this article –

The death of Hindu rituals will only mean death of the civilization as we all know. This is very well known by the leftists and hence they carry out such hit-jobs to kill the rituals to soften Hindus and de-racinate them thus making them easy targets for western propaganda and evangelists. If you analyse carefully it is the same underlying agenda which runs from Jallikattu ban to current controversy.”


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

 

Why No Pellet Gun Against Jallikattu Protesters, Demands Media

1
Pellet Gun

Our English language media icons never fail to raise their voice and ask questions of those in power, notwithstanding the way media is being muzzled under the fascist Modi Government as they claim. As peaceful Jallikattu protests have been hijacked and degenerated into mob violence in certain parts of Chennai, two doyens of English language media have raised an interesting question –

Media on Pellet Gun Use

The casual comparison of two entirely different scenarios seems puzzling, but since these are senior professionals with years of experience, maybe they know something we don’t. On the face of it, the following facts stand out –

1.)  The present volatile situation in Kashmir is the culmination of a decades old terrorist insurgency, which kicked off with the ethnic cleansing of the valley’s minority Kashmiri Pandit population in 1989/90. Terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir is directly aided and abetted by Pakistan and has led to deaths of 6274 security personnel and 14741 civilians as per South Asia Terrorism Portal. Before the 2016 disturbance in Kashmir valley over LeT terrorist Burhan Wani’s death, Kashmir had witnessed violent protests in 2008 and 2010 where 42 and 110 deaths had occurred respectively, besides injuries to thousands of security men.

It was after these deadly protests, where rubber bullets and tear gas were found ineffective, that the pellet gun was introduced by J&K police as a more “effective and focussed” crowd control measure. One can always debate better means of crowd control, but one would expect two senior media personalities to be aware of the entire context before making comparisons that make it sound like the Bharatiya state gets some perverse pleasure out of targeting Kashmiri Muslims alone.

2.) During the Jat agitation, curfew was clamped on the worst hit districts and ‘shoot at sight’ orders were issued to the Army – over 30 people were killed, many in police firing.

3.) Violent protests do break out in various parts of Bharat from time to time – and authorities do deal with it using deadly force as required. For eg, last year in Mathura, 24 people including 2 senior police officers were killed in a police operation to clear illegal armed squatters from a park. But one instance where police is extremely reluctant to use force, even when their own are being attacked, is when Muslim fundamentalists are on the rampage as witnessed in Mumbai in 2012, Vellore TN in 2015, or Dhulagarh last month. For some reason, Shekhar Gupta and Barkha Dutt have not raised the question of why pellet guns were not used against these rioters.

Their silence over Dhulagarh is especially puzzling since they did not lose the opportunity of asking this exact same question over the violence that erupted 4 months ago in Karnataka over Cauvery water dispute with TN.

4.) It seems likely that police across the country is not armed with pellet guns and trained in more specialized crowd control measures as in J&K, as no where else are we seeing the kind of separatist mass protests rooted in religious fundamentalism and glorifying terrorists that we are seeing in Kashmir. This tweets sums up the the feelings of us commoners quite well –

We appeal to Shri Shekhar Gupta and Barkha Dutt ji to educate us lesser mortals on what really constitutes ‘national interest’ or how to develop a ‘moral compass’ like theirs – surely we are missing something in our analysis, where simple logic and common sense is making us arrive at a completely different conclusion compared to their eminences.

(Feature Image Credit: pixr8.com)


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Bharatiya Thought Is Not Understood In America

1
My Yajna and Indology Kumbh Mela Harvard धर्मान्तरण प्राचीन पुरातात्विक NGO Racket गुरुओं जाति-व्यवस्था asymmetric dialog Bharatiya Exceptionalism

I was quite shocked when I discovered that Bharatiya philosophy is not being addressed properly in American universities. In fact, only two American universities offer a doctorate in Bharatiya philosophy. In general, Bharatiya thought is not considered philosophy but is being taught by the departments of religion, and badly at that, or by the departments of anthropology. This results in a complete misappreciation if not misunderstanding of Bharatiya thought and consequently, the values of Bharat.

One reason is that Western scholars have been shaped by Greco-Semitic concepts (concepts arising from the Grecian civilization and Semitic religions), and often cannot grasp the richer complexity of Bharatiya philosophical thought. Hindu Dharma, for instance, is usually perceived as being polytheistic; in reality it is both monotheistic and polytheistic — believing in one God taking different forms of manifestation.

It was another shock when I discovered that quite a number of Western scholars appropriate Bharatiya philosophical concepts without quoting the sources, as if they were the results of their own original thinking. And I learned that the situation at American high schools is no better: there is inadequate understanding of Bharat and Bharatiya thought, and the Hindu Dharma portrayed is dominated by negative stereotypes.

There is one exception to this, namely Buddhism. The Buddhists have good scholars, themselves practicing Buddhists, who teach the Buddhist religion. This also has to do with the fact that the Dalai Lama told his followers to go out and teach the traditions to keep it alive. So Tibetans went out and got their degrees in Western universities, and now they are teaching all over the world. But Hindu Dharma, Sikhism or Jainism are often being taught by Americans, who themselves believe in other religious systems!

This is even considered desirable in the name of ‘objectivity’, while the same arms-length rule does not apply to Christianity for instance, which is taught by Christians and even preachers.

Educational Council on Indic Traditions

To address these problems, the Educational Council on Indic Traditions was created. One of its first aims is to fund a survey by some nationally recognized opinion polling firms to find out what the prevalent American attitudes, opinions and beliefs are about Indic traditions. They will, for example, poll schoolteachers, college students, very committed churchgoers, etc., to find out what these different demographic segments of Americans think about Bharatiya traditions. Such a survey has never been held before and its importance is immense.

For, based on the information gathered by this survey, the Council will identify the most common stereotypes about Indic traditions, and then challenge them. There are various ways to do so. One is to fund the creation of a library of materials on Bharat and Indic thought. The slide show, The Genius of India, which was recently produced by Auroville Press, is an excellent example of the type of materials needed. Other such slide-shows or films are needed, in order, for example, to challenge certain in-baked assumptions that poverty in Bharat is a result of its Hindu Dharma.

I would also like to see a whole series of works on The History of Ideas. This would show that many of the ideas that have come out of Bharat (such as language, mathematics and logic) are not attributed as such. This process of non-attribution continues today, often quite accidentally. For instance, Carl Jung scrupulously documented his Indic sources; but his students tend to attribute the ideas about consciousness and the human psyche and so forth, to Jung himself.

Lastly, the results of the public survey will be used to show to the school boards and universities in America that there is an absolute need for them to change the way in which they portray Indic traditions. It is important to address these issues through the academia for the majority of Americans form their values and their beliefs in an academic setting.

Lack of Scholars in Bharat

The Council’s work will only begin once the survey is finished. For, there is a severe lack of good scholars, with proper academic credentials, to teach Indic thought. I found that even Bharatiya universities do not specialize in Bharatiya philosophy but concentrate instead on Western philosophy! So even when I succeed in convincing American universities to endow a chair or program in a particular branch of Bharatiya thought, there are no suitable candidates available to fill that post. That is a distressing state of affairs, and it needs to be addressed.

The Council will also have to put energy in to the Bharatiya academic institutions. It is necessary that Bharat produce scholars of international standing that can teach Indic thought in all its aspects. For example, Sri Aurobindo represents in its most modern form and concept, Bharatiya philosophical thought as it has developed over thousands of years. Yet I cannot find a single university in Bharat that can supply me with scholars having doctorate degrees in Sri Aurobindo’s thought.

If we could create a ‘Chair of Sri Aurobindo Studies’ in the philosophy or psychology departments of the main Bharatiya universities, those who get a degree there would be able to fill academic positions elsewhere, e.g. in the US, and Indic thought would get recognition. The Council intends to fund such chairs, as well as the research and dissemination of Indic thought, so that a body of scholars in different Indic traditions with strong academic credentials will be created.

Another way is to bring academic people from America to Bharat and let them see for themselves. I have two high school teachers with me on this trip. And this is an area in which Auroville could play a most important role. Auroville is unique: you have people here, steeped in Bharatiya thought and of great sincerity and commitment, which can bridge the cultural gap. We need to make maximum use of the resources you have built. We could also collaborate on the production of educational materials.

More generally, I think Auroville needs to have a global outreach program. I don’t know if you are ready yet — maybe it’s too early. You are unknown to most of the world. But Auroville should be part of the movement in US variously called Consciousness Studies, Human Potential, post-Christian spirituality, etc. You should attend important conferences and have a presence there — as Auroville. You should present your story.


You can get connected with Rajiv in any one of the following ways:

Join Rajiv Malhotra for his FB LIVE Broadcasts. Follow Rajiv on facebook.com/RajivMalhotra.Official

Twitter: https://twitter.com/RajivMessage

You Tube Video of Rajiv Malhotra: https://www.youtube.com/user/BreakingIndia

Rajiv’s discussion egroup: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RajivMalhotraDiscussion/

Email address : [email protected]

(Disclaimer: This article represents the opinions of the Author, and the Author is responsible for ensuring the factual veracity of the content. HinduPost will not be responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information, contained herein.)


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Ram Is Equally Worshipped And Venerated Among Tamils

0
Ram

 

“Ram Leela in the North, now Ravan Leela to be celebrated in the South” screamed media headlines on 10th and 11th October last year.

To those newspaper readers who never proceed beyond the big, bold letters (the headlines), the message sought to be conveyed was that just like Lord Ram was worshipped in the North, so also a similar kind of veneration existed in the South towards Ravana. It was also announced that just like an effigy of Ravana was burnt during the Ram Leela, an effigy of Lord Ram would also be burnt during this so-called Ravan Leela.

However, these media personnel didn’t show the same enthusiasm in reporting that one of the two organizers of this sham event that took place on 13th October, 2016, Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam [TPDK] could muster a strength of JUST 40 people, that too in their stronghold of Chennai. The other organization, a perpetual hater of anything Hindu, Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam (PDK) did a little better – 55 people. In short, less than 100 people took part in an event which had been marketed as something which would rival the Ram Leela (in which hundreds of millions of people participate every year) but the fact that it was an absolute dud relegated the story to somewhere deep inside the papers where it couldn’t be found.

But the impression it made on gullible readers cannot be underestimated. It is a pity that many people residing in other parts of the country still lack knowledge, or even interest, in what happens south of the Vindhyas, especially in Tamil Nadu. Their understanding of this state is that it has rejected Hindi, it insists on maintaining its distinctiveness and also worships as heroes those, who people in other regions in the country regard as villains, and nothing for them exemplifies this better than the supposed worship of Ravana.

The problem lies solely with our leftist “intellectuals” (some of whom double as “Dravidian” ideologues) along with their NGO collaborators (many heavily financed by the West), which of course couldn’t move ahead without the support of their chamchas in the media news channels (and even entertainment industry). Their agenda is to create a different identity for Tamilians, for Dalits and for Tribals – to try to portray them as being different from Hindus.

So one day a claim is made that beef has always been eaten by Dalits (no proof is offered). It then progresses to an astounding “discovery’ that Mahishasur is worshipped by THE tribals in the country – which is then singled out to just Jharkhand; there also, it gets further reduced to just some tribes in Jharkhand regarding Mahishasur as their ancestor, but show a lack of evidence that he is actually worshipped by them, while ignoring the fact that millions and millions of people even in Jharkhand itself worship Durga.

But of course, the oldest “dirtiest trick up their sleeve” has been the claim that Ravana is worshipped in Tamil Nadu instead of Ram.

Some years back, the lukewarm response to Mani Ratnam’s “RAAVANAN”, even in Tamil Nadu, created a lot of debate in the internet. Many “Dravidian” sympathizers couldn’t stomach the fact that people didn’t show much interest in a film glorifying Ravan at the expense of Lord Ram (it was a total flop outside Tamil Nadu). Actually, had it not been for the lead star cast, spectacular special effects and Mani Ratnam’s direction, the movie would have been a disaster even in Mani Ratnam’s home state.

However, these “camp followers” continued with their baseless assertion that Ram had never been worshiped in Tamil Nadu.

One of their supporters, Sitaram Yechury, (currently, General Secretary of the CPI(M) )  had in a debate conducted by India Today in 1991, declared that people in the South were devoted to “Raavayanam” in which Ravana is depicted as a hero and Ram as a villain!!! (wonder why his parents named him Sitaram, and even more shocking why he chose to retain it after he turned Marxist).

How much of this is all true? To the claim that Lord Ram is not worshipped in Tamil Nadu, the plain answer to this is that it is absolute nonsense! “Spin a lie a 100 times, and it becomes the truth”, is what our “Dravidian” / Communist friends believe in.

They have to only look at the Ramavataram or the Kamban Ramayana, written by the poet, Kamban in the 12th century (some historians say it was written around the 9th – 10th century), which is venerated by all Tamil Hindus. In fact, this historic work is considered by Tamil scholars as the greatest literary work in Tamil literature. Kamban openly acknowledges his indebtedness to the original Valmiki Ramayana, which had been written in Sanskrit.

It is true that at the hands of Kamban, Ravana does emerge in a better light –  he is praised for his scholarly qualities, a connoisseur of music, a brave and great king, etc… but even Kamban doesn’t defend Ravana for his lusty desires towards Seeta.

In Valmiki’s Ramayana, Lord Ram’s divinity is only mentioned in passing, since Valmiki emphasizes Ram as the ideal human being, the perfect person – Maryada Purushottam – whereas Kamban never allows the reader to forget that Lord Ram is GOD. Again and again, Kamban extols the virtues of Lord Ram. It is a devotional text where Kamban speaks about surrendering himself to the Lord.

So, while it is true that compared to the original Ramayana of Valmiki, or for that matter most other versions of the Ramayana, Ravana doesn’t emerge as an evil person in the Ramavataram, yet given a comparison between Ram and Ravana, there is no question that people in Tamil Nadu would choose Ravana, as Lord Ram is venerated and worshipped as GOD.

In my various travels across Tamil Nadu, and being acquainted with so many Tamils living outside the state, I have yet to come across any person whose name was Ravana, whereas Ram is one of the most common Tamil names – even the chief “Dravidian” protagonist was Ramasamy Naicker (many other “Dravidian” leaders, despite their openly anti-Hindu stances, still retain pure Sanskrit names, many named after the various forms of GOD).

Similarly, if Ravana is worshipped by Tamils as it is made out to be, how come we don’t find any temples dedicated to Ravana? New temples constructed in the past 100 years or so, due to “Dravidian” influence is another thing, but where are the historical temples dedicated to Ravana? Small shrines dedicated to Ravana at some Saivite temples don’t mean anything, as those were installed on the strength of his being a follower of Lord Shiva, but we do not have any historical independent temples for Ravana in Tamil Nadu or elsewhere in South India, whereas there are innumerable for Lord Ram, or Lord Vishnu / Lord Krishna for that matter.

The only place that Ravana is venerated by the people is in Sri Lanka, where some Sinhalese scholars regard Ravana as an ancestor of the community, though even in Sri Lanka, Lord Ram is considered a great personality, if not a divine one.

A Tamil political party, the Panthers Party of India, had absurdly claimed that in Tamil Nadu, people only worshipped local deities, probably implying that Tamil Nadu had no tradition of worshipping mainstream Hindu deities, but any 1st time visitor to Tamil Nadu would find out that the reality was completely different. In fact, Tamil Nadu has the maximum number of Hindu temples in the country, which are dedicated to Lord Shiva, Lord Vishnu and HIS incarnations, to Parvati / Durga and HER incarnations, to Ganesha and to Kartikeya / Murugan. Even Murugan, who is considered by some “Dravidians” as a  non “Aryan” God, is accepted by all devotees and others, as being the son of Lord Shiva. The worship of Kartikeya / Murugan has been proven to be a very ancient one, even in other parts of the country (HE was also known as Skanda in our scriptures).

In the meantime, in Yechury’s native Andhra Pradesh, Lord Ram directly, either in HIS magnificent temple at Bhadrachalam, or in the other Vaishnavite forms – Lord Balaji at Tirupati (the most-visited temple in the whole country and the richest shrine in the country), and Lord Narasimha, are the most worshiped deities. Ram Navami, celebrating the day that Lord Ram appeared, is one of the biggest festivals in Andhra Pradesh. Here, it can be added that the maximum number of devotees visiting Tirupati hail from Tamil Nadu.

No such scripture as Ravayanama, glorifying Ravana and demonizing Ram exists, either in Andhra Pradesh or elsewhere, as Yechury had falsely claimed. But of course, it isn’t his fault. Comrades are known to be liars of international repute.

It is only the “Dravidian” leaders of the 1900s, who started claiming that Ram was an “Aryan invader” from North India, who fought and defeated a “Dravidian” king, namely Ravana………such a statement had been totally absent in any of the Hindu scriptures, either the very ancient ones, or right up to the medieval times…….thus, we can see how a British mischief / creation of “Aryan-Dravidian” divide fueled the “Dravidian” movement, and spearheaded the campaign to degrade Lord Ram.

One of their leaders, Kulanthai Pulavar wrote a book, ‘Iravanan Kapiyam” where Ravana was the hero of the epic, and one other camp-follower, R.S.Manohar, a theater person made a stage play titled “Lankeswaran” where Ravana was the hero of the drama.

But these are absolutely recent developments, though no doubt people like Mani Ratnam  may have been inspired by them.

But, most of the people in Tamil Nadu do not pay heed to such people, as irrespective of the success or the failure of a film like “Raavan” worship of Lord Ram is firmly entrenched in Tamil culture.

Sri Raman / Sitha Raman / Ramachandran / Janaki Manaalan / Ayodhya Raman / Dasaratha Kumaran / Pattabhi Raman – are some among the many names by which Rama is adoringly called by his Tamil devotees.

The Ramayana is entwined in their daily lives in many ways, including to being alluded in several popular proverbs. Even now, in villages whenever a rendition of Kamban Ramayana is narrated, and people hear about Lord Ram and Seeta, they are moved to moods of ecstasy and exhibit tears.

During the mid 80s, when Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayana TV serial was telecast every Sunday, the response from Tamil Nadu, like the rest of the country, was absolute. Despite the serial being in Hindi, most people in Tamil Nadu stopped all activities between 09:30 – 10:30 AM, the time that the serial was telecast. In fact, it was said that if sometimes some marriages had to take place during that time, it was a compulsion to arrange for a television for the guests, so that they would not be deprived of watching their favorite program during the wedding.

The “Dravidian” movement is not even 150 years old, but the worship of Lord Ram has been going on uninterrupted for thousands of years, if not more, by Hindus all over the world, including in Tamil Nadu.


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Jallikattu and the threat to Bharatiya identity

3
Jallikattu Conspiracy Bharatiya Identity

The underlying divisions of opinion in Bharat on Jallikattu are more complex than public discussions seem able to acknowledge. They highlight something more profound and importantly not readily apparent. The anti Hindu and anti Bharatiya Dravidian political culture, crassly self serving now, is rooted, like the Khalistani movement, in the British colonial policy of divide-and-rule. But it innocently retained attachment to some pagan Hindu practices that evangelists and their local assets consider unpropitious to the mission of erasing the Hindu faith altogether.

As Alexander Duff, a prominent nineteenth century missionary, wrote in the aftermath of the Bharatiya revolt of 1857, the project was to transform “idolatrous, superstition-ridden India; in which “the whole of Hinduism . . . is a huge congeries of falsities and lies,”.

What the somewhat petty controversy over Jallikattu indirectly confirms is that the conquest of Bharat by eradicating its indigenous meme, initiated in eighth century, did not end in 1947. The struggle for control over Bharat and its immense human and natural resources has continued unabated. Jallikattu in fact underlines, as do other analogous issues, two fundamental realities likely to determine the outcome of the struggle for its control. The first is the derisory understanding of the outside world of Bharatiya society and most of its elites. The second and related shortcoming is the inability to respond collectively as a united society against challenges to Bharat’s integrity and autonomy.

Jallikattu is representative of the Bharatiya past, many historic aspects of which are increasingly being questioned, in succession, by forces deeply hostile to Indic culture and its Hindu foundations. The diabolical foreign evangelical forces and their NGO surrogates challenging Jallikattu are not really bothered about anyone’s welfare, animals least of all. But they perceive in the sport of Jallikattu a Bharatiya societal fissure that can be exploited to advance their own nefarious goals.

The internal divisions over Jallikattu appear to offer them further opportunities to undermine Bharat’s Hindu identity and autonomy. The sport supposedly troubles these foreign interventionists more than the horrendous hourly brutal killing of millions of animals to uphold bleak religious injunctions. Nor are these fraudulent human and animal rights activists exercised over the genocidal slaughter of people in various parts of the world undertaken by the nations from which they originate.

The truth of the matter is that Bharat is a target for foreign control. All debates about human rights, democracy and tolerance are ideological instruments to achieve this purpose. Bharatiya domestic counterparts of these arrant conspiracies in politics, media and academia are mere echoes of a phenomenon that has found what can aptly be described as a comprador class within Bharatiya society. The subjugation of Bharat is being attempted because it is judged feasible and its society is divided and vulnerable.

Many of its politicians are in the pay of foreign countries, including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, China and the US and its NATO allies. The Bharatiya bureaucracy is self serving and much of it beholden to countries to which a huge swathe of the children of bureaucrats has migrated. Their professional aspirations are financed by subversive funding agencies, closely connected to the government. The Bharatiya media is pretty much an ancillary of sedition and treason and its film industry a cultural front of imperialist Islam. Bharatiya celluloid entertainment is largely a secondary aspect of the project to undermine the self confidence of Bharat’s Hindu people and their faith by portraying it as prone to criminality as well as instinctively lascivious.

Hindu Bharat has not had a genuine and autonomous state for over a thousand years that could establish an indigenous political culture of statecraft and traditions of confident self governance. China’s history of continuous sovereignty, despite defeats and setback after the nineteenth century and earlier Mongol incursions, though mostly absorbed into the pre-existing political culture of China, is a contrast to Bharatiya foreign subjugation. Bharat’s foreign rulers, both Muslim and British, were brutal overseers, thoroughly alienated from its indigenous Hindus, whom they regarded as contemptible pagans. The condition of Hindus was of neo slavery, physically threatened constantly and psychologically neutered. Indeed even Persia has been independent for most of its history and remains deeply aware of its traditions and glorious imperial primacy in the region, despite religious conversion. Independent regional Bharatiya kingdoms were short-lived and rarely lasted more than two generations after the passing of their founder. 

All that happened after Bharatiya independence was installation of inept and effete political elites and administrators socialised to serve British imperial rule. They quickly adopted an imported economic model that prevented Bharat from creating an abundant and deeply-rooted entrepreneurial class and that continues to haunt it. Economic success that eluded Bharat could have created wealth and prosperity to provide the means for self assertion and mitigated domestic protest by groups that still seek today to destroy the Bharatiya Union.

The self confident Nehru, neither Gandhian nor Machiavellian, rapidly bartered away Bharat internationally, losing much of Kashmir and with it direct access to Afghanistan, a veritable calamity still not fully grasped by Bharatiyas. The ‘great man’ refused to listen to sound advice from Sardar Vallabhai Patel and the astute head of the MEA China desk, preferring instead the treasonous courtier, K. M. Panikkar, he had sent as ambassador to China. In the process he jeopardised Bharatiya security and has left the entire eastern half of the country vulnerable to desolation because China now controls the Brahmaputra River. Nehru’s pathetic letters to John F. Kennedy, the US President, appealing for help, while Chinese forces advanced untroubled, are a testament to his foolhardy pride and shocking incompetence.

Jallikattu is only one of Bharat’s many domestic divisions that foreign interventionists and NGOs, especially those engaged in purveying poverty porn and religion, regard as opportune fissures in Bharatiya society to exploit. They seek to reduce the Hindu imprint in the culture and practices of Bharatiya society. Secularism and human rights have become their weapons of choice to undermine Hindu self awareness and promote Islam and Christianity. Bharat’s socio-political elites are essentially enslaved to foreign perspectives on their own predicament. They buy pretty much anything thrown at them because they have long been socialised in self hate.

The fact that Bharat’s educated and chattering classes are clueless and happy to collaborate with anyone from abroad and take their cue from the execrable BBC and New York Times to judge their own society says it all. This phenomenon is a variant on how Mexico’s Aztec emperor Montezuma lost his kingdom, exposing his people to slavery and eventual destruction, having foolishly imagined the invaders were gods and failing to kill them all when it was entirely feasible.


Did you like this report? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.