spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
23.4 C
Sringeri
Friday, May 3, 2024
Home Blog Page 400

Firecracker issue in courts, again – what it tells about the nature of the Indian state?

0
cracker

No sooner Deepawali is around the corner than crackers are made villains of rising pollution. According to available information, the Supreme Court (SC) has clarified that the ban on firecrackers containing barium is not limited to Delhi-NCR alone but is applicable to all states.

Apex court bans crackers

cracker

The Supreme Court, on Tuesday (7 November), reaffirmed its previous directives regarding the use of firecrackers during the festive season in Rajasthan and other states. The court emphasized that it is the responsibility of everyone to address the issue of pollution. A bench consisting of Justices AS Bopanna and MM Sundresh specifically instructed Rajasthan to take measures to reduce air pollution, particularly during festivals.

During the hearing of an application concerning firecrackers in Rajasthan, an advocate requested the court to enforce compliance with its previous orders. The advocate pointed out that the court’s earlier order was originally applicable to the Delhi National Capital Region and sought a nationwide ban on crackers.

The court clarified that there is a misconception that the court alone bears the responsibility for environmental issues. It stressed that pollution management is a collective duty, and every citizen should ensure that Diwali celebrations are environmentally friendly with fewer crackers.

Furthermore, the apex court made an observation that, these days, adults tend to use more crackers than schoolchildren. It also directed the state of Rajasthan to take immediate action to control pollution in Udaipur. Meanwhile, another lawyer informed the court about another application related to stubble burning.

The court has asked the Meteorology Department to submit its response within two weeks and noted that there seems to be a blame game surrounding the issue. Previously, on September 22, the Supreme Court had rejected a plea seeking permission to manufacture, sell, and use crackers containing barium chemicals.

Additionally, the court declined to intervene in the Delhi Government’s decision to impose a complete ban on crackers in the national capital. The court’s focus was primarily on the matter of firecrackers. One of the petitions was filed by BJP leader Manoj Tiwari in 2022, challenging the comprehensive ban on firecrackers during Diwali celebrations in Delhi. In 2021, the Supreme Court clarified that there is no general prohibition on the use of firecrackers, and only crackers containing barium salts are restricted.

Diwali crackers are villainized while the real cause of pollution is left untackled

Only recently, the Kerala High Court ruled that crackers were ‘not mandated’ by any holy book while ordering the seizure of ‘illegal’ crackers. On 3 November, the Kerala High Court issued a directive to the Deputy Collector of Cochin and various districts within the state to conduct inspections at all religious establishments and confiscate “illegal firecrackers.” The Court emphasized the need for cooperation with the Commissioner of Police in this endeavor.

It is an altogether different matter that bursting crackers during Deepawali is an ancient Hindu tradition. Also, it is not without reason that fireworks are used during festivals, particularly Deepawali. Advocate Sai Deepak beautifully explains the reason behind bursting crackers during Deepawali.

However, the important question to ask is – why Hindus should bear all the burden of ‘saving’ the environment. Diwali is one of the most important festivals for Hindus across the world. It must be highlighted that no blanket ban was imposed on crackers during Christmas and New Year, unlike Deepawali. Moreover, in Bharat, while political victories, celebrity weddings, or even the return from jail of a Bollywood entertainer’s son accused of drug abuse can be ‘celebrated’ by setting off crackers, Hindus celebrating their festivals are being treated like criminals.

In fact, scientific studies have proven that Deepawali crackers are not even among the top fifteen causes of pollution. Diwali firecrackers are not responsible for Delhi’s air pollution woes every winter. Studies by reputed scientific bodies such as TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute), IIT Kanpur,  SAFAR (System for Air Quality and Weather Forecasting and Research) GoI have all shown that firecrackers do not contribute to air pollution in any significant way.

Year after year, stubble burning has emerged as the top reason for the decline of the Air Quality Index (AQI), and yet there is a reluctance on the part of the government to clearly call out the farmers for choking Delhi. Even the apex court has pulled up the Centre and state for pollution in Delhi but refused to look at the real cause.

ANI quotes environmental activist Vimlendu Jha as saying, “If the government was actually making an effort, the air quality would not have turned this bad. Stubble burning is an important contributor to pollution. We need to find a sustainable solution to stubble burning”.

CJI Chandrachud refused to hold an urgent hearing last year on stubble-burning, saying a ban on stubble-burning would not solve the problem of pollution. The Chief Justice remarked, “Will the ban (against stubble burning) help?” He added that in some matters, courts could look into and some it cannot since they are not ‘judicially amenable’. The council suggested that banning stubble burning can be effective in curbing air pollution, which impacts Delhi-NCR. The bench then queried, “Should we enforce it against every farmer in Punjab and Uttar Pradesh?” It added that some genuine solution should be found, but ‘this is not the way’.

Every year farmers in Punjab and Haryana burn crop stubble before the next sowing season. The stubble that farmers burn is mostly paddy (rice) stubble which is burnt because of the short (10-15 days) gap between the rice-harvesting season and the wheat-sowing time. And why do farmers grow rice in Punjab despite almost negligible local consumption? Because rice is covered under MSP (Minimum Support Price), and government procures almost 100 % cent of the rice produced in Punjab and Haryana.

Also, government subsidies on water and power in these states make it easier to grow a water-intensive crop like rice, but this has resulted in overexploitation of groundwater. Experts recommend effective and diversified cropping patterns are the need of the hour in Punjab and Haryana.

So why are Hindu festivals being targeted? Diwali is being used as a convenient beating stick as it is probably difficult to address the actual cause. All kinds of arguments, such as stubble burning contributing only 4-10% of total pollution through the year, are being used to downplay its seasonal impact. But firecrackers, whose contribution is microscopic, are demonized. It is even more appalling that Delhi’s problems with air quality are used as a basis to ban crackers across the country!

From banning crackers during Deepawali to restricting the height of Dahi Handi during Janmashtami celebrations to interfering in Sabarimala traditions, a section of the judiciary has repeatedly bared its anti-Hindu fangs.

Anti-Hindu Activism & secular Indian state

The contrast in the manner in which the court holds Hindus celebrating Deepawali guilty but gives farmers a free pass is both discriminatory and Hinduphobic. Parents also need to stop discouraging their children in the name of environmentalism. It cannot be emphasized enough that every time a Hindu festival is around, activists come to life.

We have seen the vilification of jallikattu by ‘animal rights activists’ and organizations like PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals), whereas their tongues go into deep freeze when it comes to opposing the slaughter of animals during Eid or Thanksgiving.

If we were to believe the cabal, milk that can feed the poor gets wasted on Maha Shivratri, toxic fumes are released on Diwali due to bursting firecrackers harming people and animals alike, animals are endlessly troubled and traumatized due to jallikattu (bull sport) during Pongal (Sankranti), and so on and so forth. The list is endless, and the cabal has made a business out of running social awareness campaigns exclusively during Hindu festivals.

The advent of social media (SM) has exposed their hypocrisy, but the cabal continues to invent newer campaigns targeting Hindus and Hindu festivals. Holi is usually a time for the cabal to ‘explain’ to Hindus the need for conserving water, but in 2021 the template was changed to something more sinister. Since then, ‘Holi hooliganism’ has become the theme of the Hinduphobic cabal.

Even the secular state imposes unreasonable restrictions on Hindu festivals. In 2021, the Odisha government placed severe restrictions on Hindu festivals, using the pandemic as an excuse. Similarly, the Uddhav Thackeray-led MVA government also restricted the celebration of Hindu festivals of Janmashtami and Ganpati Chaturthi. Even the Gujarat government came up with similar guidelines for celebrating the Krishna Janmashtami and Ganesh Chaturthi festivals. However, they fared marginally better in that certain relaxations were announced by the Gujarat government in the celebration of both these Hindu festivals.

It must be mentioned that at the same time, ‘minority’ festivals saw relaxation and mass crowds in almost every state. Despite a raging out-of-control COVID crisis in Kerala, the state decided to remove lockdowns for three days during Bakr-Eid.

There are some Hindu festivals that are targeted by activist gangs demanding the ban of festivals despite the fact that animals have no role at all in them. Kite flying on Makar Sankranti is one such example. The activist gang is running a campaign to ban it, alleging that kite flying results in birds getting injured/ killed. Can anything be more illogical than this? Offering milk to Naagdevta on  Naagpanchami also has been attacked in recent years.

Many temples in south Bharat own elephants, and they are part of annual celebrations. They lead the festive procession and are revered by millions of devotees. This, too, is under constant attack from activists alleging ill-treatment of elephants by temple authorities. And it’s not that only animal rights gangs are after Hindu festivals. Participation of children in Dahi Handi was banned by the courts on the petition filed by child rights activists despite no direct evidence of child rights violations in Dahi Handi celebrations.

Gone are the days when Hindu festivals used to be treated as an auspicious occasion, where the entire society used to celebrate together when festivals were considered as an opportunity to spread joy, love, and festivities. Unfortunately, the liberal-secular-Islamist cabal has attacked our festivals and transformed them into days when Hindus are restricted in the name of ‘security and maintaining communal harmony’.

The situation has turned so bad that anything and everything associated with the Hindu community has become intolerable to the Hinduphobes within so-called ‘minority’ communities and their liberal-secular counterparts. They try everything, constitutional or unconstitutional, to kill the festive vibes of the Hindu community in any part of the country.

It is for us Hindus to not just stop the attack but to reverse the damage by rooting our children in Dharma. Celebrating festivals is one of several important measures in teaching future generations to be proud Hindus. Hindu dharma is naturally inclined towards saving the environment because, for Hindus environment is a living entity, and nature is divine.

We don’t need activists sitting in AC cabins and using fuel-guzzling and polluting SUVs all through the year to give us gyaan on how to save the environment. Especially when these activists have their tongues in knots when environmentally harmful acts such as slaughtering animals during Eid, Christmas, and Thanksgiving, cutting down numerous trees during Christmas, bursting firecrackers during Christmas, Western New Year, political rallies, cricket tournaments, etc., are allowed to go on unabashedly.

Everything in our Republic gets distorted due to deracinated, disconnected elite & vote-bank politics. It is only the Hindu identity that is the easiest punching bag. For too long, Hindu Samaj has borne the burden of ‘secularism’, ‘tolerance’, and ‘democracy’, among other things. It is high time we reclaim our festive and cultural spaces from the social service campaigns they have been turned into.

Teach future generations to celebrate festivals with gusto. If we don’t teach our Dharma, then others will teach them theirs. If the roots are not strong, the tree can be easily hacked. Islamists and Evangelists are always on the prowl to convert Hindus. We only need to look at America, Europe, Africa, and Australia, which have lost their native religion to the Abrahamic ones, and our own neighboring Islamic nations, which were once part of Akhand Bharat, where Hindu Dharma and other Dharmic faiths flourished.

AP HC judge recuses from hearing YSRCP MP’s PIL against Jagan govt

0
(Image Source : ANI)
(Image Source : ANI)

A judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on Wednesday recused from hearing the petition of rebel MP of YSR Congress Party (YSRCP), K. Raghu Ramakrishna Raju, for an inquiry into alleged illegal decisions and corrupt activities of the state government.

When the petition came up before a division bench comprising Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice R. Raghunandan Rao, the latter recused from hearing the same saying not before me. The judge opted out of the hearing on the ground that some parties to the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) were his clients earlier.

The Chief Justice said he would constitute a new bench to take up the matter on a later date.

Raghu Ramakrishna Raju, sought direction for a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into certain decisions taken by the Jagan Mohan Reddy-led government. He alleged that these decisions were taken to benefit Chief Minister Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, his relatives and certain private companies.

Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy, MP V. Vijay Sai Reddy, Government Advisor Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy and Minister Peddireddy Ramachandra Reddy are the respondents in the PIL.

Meanwhile, Raghu Ramakrishna Raju alleged that the government obtaining bank loans against TIDCO houses allotted to beneficiaries is another major scam. He said TDP MLA from Palakollu, Nimmala Ramanaidu has exposed this scam. The MLA staged a protest along with the beneficiaries, who received bank notices.

The MP said that in future the Jagan government may mortgage all the assets of people living in the state.

(This article has been published via a syndicated feed)

Accusations of Harassment and violation of privacy by Prof. Sameena Dalwai of OP Jindal University confirmed by the Haryana State Commission for Women Chairperson

0
(Image Source : Organiser)
(Image Source : Organiser)

The Hinduphobic Professor Sameena Dalwai who teaches Gender at OP Jindal University was accused of violating the privacy of students and harassing them by accessing the private dating accounts of students in class and using it for “personality dissection”. Professor Dalwai, a Hamas sympathizer has a proven track record of Hinduphobia and has problems with students chanting “Jai Shri Ram”. She also casually brands students who don’t agree with her point of view as “right-wing”.

Following the fresh round of accusations against Professor Dalwai in the Bumble dating app incident, Renu W Bhatia, Chairperson of the Haryana State Commission for Women took note of the incident and conducted an investigation.

Renu W. Bhatia carried out the investigation by visiting the campus of OP Jindal Global University this Tuesday and speaking with students. According to a post on Renu Bhatia’s X account, she spoke to the students who “confirmed the accusations of harassment and violation of privacy during classes by Prof. Sameena Dalwai”.

According to the post, she came across many other shocking facts during her conversations with the students. Renu W. Bhatia discovered that the students were subjected to harassment based on the ideology they adhered to and the female students in the class were subjected to atrocious stereotypes based on their looks. The students were also reportedly made to feel uncomfortable based on their religion.

The Haryana State Commission Chairperson clearly emphasized that this shocking behavior by a teacher was a clear violation of the fundamental rights of students, and it was time to take strict action against the concerned teacher and put an end to the harassment and anguish of students.

According to Renu W. Bhatia’s X post, the OP Jindal University’s Vice-Chancellor Pro. C. Rajkumar denied having any knowledge of the event but also mentioned that he “had received an apology from the concerned faculty”.

Hopefully, the Haryana State Commission for Women’s Chairperson’s incident will lead to some sort of action against Professor Sameena Dalwai. But going by the way leftist woke culture has spread its tentacles in Bharatiya universities, it seems unlikely that Professor Dalwai would be asked to resign. The fact that the Vice-Chancellor emphasized that the concerned faculty has apologized is in itself an attempt to brush off the incident under the carpet. She will probably act a bit low-key for a while and then continue with her hate- mongering.

One needs to emphasize here that the accusations against Professor Dalwai aren’t limited to accessing the dating accounts of female students and showing it in front of the whole class, but she has a consistent track record of Hinduphobic behavior and sympathy for extremist elements. Prof Sameena Dalwai is a known Hamas sympathizer and she has been known to defend a talk happening on the premises of OP Jindal Global University where a terrorist organization like Hamas was glorified and Bharatiya Army was labeled a terrorist organization in the context of the Pulwama incident. To add to that, as Renu W. Bhatia confirmed in her post on X, she also has a history of discriminating against students based on their ideology and religion. Such a string of accusations is no mean feat. It’s for the university administration to seriously ponder if the students should be exposed at all to a human being full of so much prejudice, hatred, and value judgments. Is it even safe for students to be taught by such a person?

The fact that it’s been a day since the Haryana State Commission Chairperson shared her observations on X after visiting the campus of OP Jindal Global University. But none of the mainstream newspapers have carried a story reporting these developments so far. Had this been the story of a Hindu Professor being accused of Islamophobia, the issue would have received grand coverage from not just national but all major international media. But since, in this case, the accused is not a Hindu and hapless Hindu students are at the receiving end of her hatred and prejudices, none of the mainstream media is interested in this story.

Bharatiya universities are becoming the fiefdom of poisonous leftist propaganda being implanted into the minds of students through the humanities and social sciences courses. Since many of the new- fangled disciplines in Humanities and Social Sciences are so open-ended, it’s easy to run an agenda and fit categories like Caste and Gender, the supposed terror of the Bharatiya state, etc, anywhere and everywhere. Now, even science-based educational institutions like IITs are also becoming victims of this woke phenomenon. Even an IIT would have a humanities department and some of the faculty of these departments try to play the woke activist by inviting anti-Bharat personalities to deliver lectures.

In a fresh incident at IIT Bombay, Professor Sharmistha Saha who teaches at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Bombay, invited radical leftist Sudhanv Deshpande for a talk in which he eulogized Palestinian militants Zakaria Zubeidi, and Ghasan Kanafani. The news of this incident is shared on the X handle “IIT B for Bharat” and a short video screenshot of the talk is also attached along with.

The account has many posts regarding this incident and according to these posts, Sudhanva Deshpande was invited by Professor Sharmistha Saha “under the pretext of course” Performance Theory & Praxis””.

Now with the rise of the awareness of Bharatiyas and the ease with which one can go viral (thanks to social media) such kind of anti-Bharat activities being undertaken by university faculty in the name of education cannot go unnoticed. These activities will be increasingly highlighted and condemned. The Bharatiya government cannot, of course, interfere in the internal functioning of private educational institutions. But when education itself has become so political and vulnerable to extreme left-wing propaganda, it’s perhaps high time that the Ministry of Education lays out a certain charter of dos and don’ts that has to be binding for Bharatiya educational institutions.

Lokpal has ordered CBI probe into Mahua Moitra’s corruption on my complaint: Nishikant Dube

0
Moitra

In what could spell more troubles for Mahua Moitra, who is facing charges in the alleged ‘cash for query’ case, BJP leader Nishikant Dubey claimed on Wednesday that anti-corruption body Lokpal has ordered a CBI inquiry against her on the basis of his complaint against the the Trinamool Congress MP.

In a post on X, Dubey, the BJP Lok Sabha MP from Jharkhand’s Godda, said, “On the basis of my complaint, the Lokpal today ordered a CBI inquiry into Mahua Moitra’s corruption that compromises national security.”

The remarks of Dubey, who had earlier complained to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla against the alleged corruption of Moitra, came a day before the meeting of the Parliament’s Ethics Committee to decide the draft charges against the Trinamool MP from West Bengal’s Krishnanagar.

On November 2, Moitra along with the opposition members of the Committee, had stormed out of the meeting accusing the panel’s chairperson Vinod Sonkar of asking her ‘personal’ and ‘unethical’ questions.

Taking a swipe at the Ethics Committee, Moitra had tweeted on Tuesday, “No draft report circulated as is norm but will be ‘adopted’ on November 9. Meeting postponed to clash with Congress MP’s nomination date so he can’t come. BJP calling allies to ensure attendance to adopt via majority. Chartered flight to fly in MP state president. How scared Adani and (Prime Minister Narendra) Modi are.”

She had also written to Om Birla on November 2 alleging that she was subjected to “proverbial vastraharan” by the chairperson of the Ethics Committee during the hearing on the cash for query allegations against her.

The Ethics Committee is probing Dubey’s allegations that Moitra accepted cash and favours for asking questions in the Lok Sabha against industrialist Gautam Adani at the behest of businessman Darshan Hiranandani.

On October 26, Dubey and advocate Anant Dehadrai had given “oral evidence” to the Committee against Moitra.

(This article has been published via a syndicated feed)

Relentless Turmoil in Bangladesh

0
human rights watch

The ground situation in Bangladesh remains disturbed as the opposition parties continue demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, but she had already rejected it outrightly. The political opponents have threatened to boycott the forthcoming national election due in January next year and pronounced nationwide protest demonstrations and blockades across the south Asian country.

The day long agitation in Dhaka by the prime opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party on 28 October and subsequent blockades by its political allies protesting the high handedness of the Bangladesh police as well as the ruling Awami League workers had merged with a series of violent incidents killing a number of people and thousands being detained.

Thus our neighbouring country  has slipped to the cycle of chaos and violence. Khaleda Zia led BNP, which boycotted the 2014 general elections but reluctantly participated in 2018 polls, vows to boycott the electoral exercise if PM Hasina does not resign paving the way for a neutral caretaker government in Dhaka.

The combined opposition parties including the largest Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami claim that Hasina and her party workers will rig the polls in her favour as she is seeking the mandate from nearly 120 million Bangladeshi voters for her consecutive fourth five-year term in office. The daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (who led the 1971 freedom movement against the Islamic Republic of Pakistan) Hasina has already stated that neither she will resign nor the Jatiya Sangsad be dissolved prior to the January election.

The determined Awami leader disclosed that an election-time government will function during the polls to run the regular affairs without any major policy decisions. The election commission made a public statement that it had no other option except to conduct the election on time as per guidelines of the Bangladesh Constitution. It revealed that the  constitution specifies that the polls for Jatiya Sangsad (with 300 elected members) must be organised within 90 days before the end of its full term. 

The three-months count for the current Parliament began on 1 November and the 12th national election must be conducted and completed by 29 January. By now political disturbances in the developing nation have attracted the attention of UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres, who called on all parties in Bangladesh to refrain from violence, any excessive use of force, and arbitrary detention of individuals.

The UN office of the high commissioner for human rights echoed similar concerns. Seven influential countries (namely the United States of America, United Kingdom, Republic of Korea, Canada, Australia, Japan and Norway) issued a joint statement through their diplomatic missions to condemn the ongoing political violence in Bangladesh following confrontations between the workers of BNP and Awami League from time to time. Even though Bangladesh is burning with political turmoil, India continues to engage the Hasina government for various bilateral initiatives including the enhancement of rail, bus & waterway services as well as cross-border energy trades.

Lately Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Bangladesh counterpart Hasina virtually inaugurated three major connectivity and energy projects including a cross-border rail link that connects Agartala with Akhaura. The international rail link will help better connectivity for tourists from both the countries and north-eastern traders to use Chittagong port of Bangladesh in need. Tripura chief minister Manik Saha, who was also present on the occasion, commented that the 12.24 kilometer railway line (5.46 km in India and 6.7 km in Bangladesh) will reduce the distance between Agartala and Kolkata from 1,600 km to 500 km only.

Political observers predict a probable electoral loss for Hasina if the polls are conducted in a free and fair manner. But the BNP (if they finally decide to participate in the election) may not emerge as a winner. In such a situation, the Muslim majority country may go to the hands of military dictators once again. Moreover, the Islamist elements may grab the opportunity to fulfil their long desire to make Bangladesh an Islamic nation with little hope for its return to a Parliamentary democracy. These all may jeopardise bilateral relationships with Dhaka making significant negative impacts on northeast India. A matter of concern for the north-eastern region indeed.

How newspapers are censoring mention of Punjab in the air pollution debate

0
(Image Source : Opindia)
(Image Source : Opindia)

Newspapers have turned Punjab into Lord Voldemort i.e.

“He Who Must Not Be Named.” Some newspapers in our country have chosen to engage in a game of “Let’s Avoid Any Reference to Punjab” when reporting on the SC hearing regarding air pollution in Delhi.

Let’s take a look.

TOI has gone to the extent of excluding Punjab from their infographic. It is tiptoeing around Punjab’s role in air pollution, going for generic stubble coverage & emphasizing issue of phasing out paddy in Punjab p.s. check the last news clip & their lopsided focus.

The Hindustan Times seems to be treading lightly as well, with a headline so generic that it could be summed up as “Air Pollution: A Widespread Issue.”

Look at the clever use of ‘all states’ & the mention of ‘Odd-Even strategy’ without giving due credit to the AAP government.

The Indian Express & The Hindu have also joined the “Punjab? What Punjab?” club.

IE highlights the word “Punjab” only in the subtitle. The Hindu avoids using the word “Punjab” in the headline on the front page, using the term “other states” to make it more generic.

Now Amar Ujala does let Punjab sneak into the conversation but slyly mentions “other neighboring states” and in next clip pushes the responsibility onto the center to solve Punjab’s pesky little problem.

How considerate!

Quite amusing how these newspapers are playing hide-and-seek with the word ‘Punjab’. Live Hindustan and Navbharat Times collectively blaming multiple states, avoiding the ‘P-bomb’. Whereas Dainik Bhaskar and Jagran News keep readers guessing with generic headlines, no mention of Punjab.

10 on 10 marks on creativity to these newspapers for sidestepping the mention of Punjab. Ethical journalism would have, however, warranted them to not avoid/downplay such aspects of a story, as it hinders public’s understanding of the issue & will contribute to misinformation.

(This article has been compiled from the tweet thread posted by @WordsSlay on November 08, 2023, with minor edits to improve readability and conform to HinduPost style guide)

Qatar – the equal opportunity terrorism supporter

0
(Image Source : Organiser)
(Image Source : Organiser)

The duplicity of Qatar was first exposed in secret conversations recorded in the late 1990s that exposed Qatar’s cloak-and-dagger behaviour and intent to weaken Saudi Arabia in a strategy that sought to combine groundless revenge with far-fetched ambition. The conversations between Libya’s former leader Muammar Gaddafi, Qatar’s former Emir Shaikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani, and former Prime Minister Shaikh Hamad Bin Jasem Al Thani reveal plans to divide Saudi Arabia into three countries.

In this leaked conversation, Hamad Bin Jasem told Gaddafi that Qatar signed an agreement with Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defence at the time, in order to confront Saudi Arabia. “We agreed to the plan because Saudi Arabia conspired with Egypt and other countries against us and plotted a coup that almost succeeded but failed because we stood firm. The Americans assisted us and presented an official warning to Saudi Arabia to leave us alone. Afterwards, we did not feel at ease and felt that we needed a force that would deter them (Saudis).”

Rather than trying to strengthen international relations, Qatar’s political deficiency and inferiority complex move it towards confrontation with the GCC by challenging Saudi Arabia for the title of the leader of the Arab Nations.

Two overarching goals have driven Qatari policy. One has been to maximize Qatar’s influence on the regional and international stage. This originally reflected the personal ambition of the former ruler and current emir’s father, Shaykh Hamad bin Khalifa al Thani, and his foreign minister and eventual prime minister, Shaykh Hamad bin Jassim al Thani. The two men directed foreign policy until the father abdicated in favour of his son, Emir Tamim bin Hamad al Thani, in July 2013.

The second objective has been to preserve the security of the ruling family and state. Hosting a major US military in its military base near Doha since 2001 has provided existential security for Qatar. Supporting Islamists, from the Muslim Brotherhood to Salafi groups, has served as a power amplifier for the country, especially vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia.

Politics in Qatar are reserved for an elite circle of ruling family members and their appointees. An elected municipal council advises on local services, but the establishment of a semi-elected assembly, called for in the new 2004 constitution, has been delayed multiple times. Political parties and associations are forbidden. The most remote forms of political expression by Qataris with regard to their own government are not tolerated and punished cruelly.

In Qatar, Islamist activism does not exist. The Islamist politics that Doha has championed in the Gulf and neighbouring regions are illegal in Qatar. This wealthy state still allows private fundraising for Al Qaeda, ISIS, and other radical organisations. In some cases, the Al-Thani family’s Emirate encourages the private financing of extremist groups by inviting their prominent supporters to speak in Qatar. By outsourcing its foreign policy to middlemen who fundraise for and finance the Syrian opposition, Qatar removes the liability of directly meddling in Syrian affairs. Allowing local fundraising for groups operating in Syria and Iraq also helps to direct Qatari citizens’ political inclinations outside the country and bolster the government’s so-called Islamist credentials both at home and abroad.

There has been constant support among the Al–Thani royal family for radical Islamist groups, including ISIS’s predecessor network and Al Qaeda. One royal family member, Abdul Karim al Thani, operated a safe house for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who eventually established and led AQI (al-Qaeda in Iraq), when he was travelling between Iraq and Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Abdul Karim also provided Qatari passports and more than one million dollars to finance Zarqawi’s network. On October 28, 2002; Laurence Foley, an American diplomat, was killed in Amman, Jordan on the orders of Zarqawi. The subsequent U.S. investigation uncovered the role of the Al-Thani royals in supporting terrorists.

Another royal family member, Shaykh Abdullah bin Khalid al-Thani, who held top ministerial posts over a period of two decades through mid-2013, sheltered on his farm other al-Qaeda members, including Khalid Shaykh Mohammad, and welcomed Osama bin Laden there twice, according to a U.S. Congressional Research Service report. Khalid Shaykh Mohammad eventually became the mastermind behind September 11, 2001 attack on USA.

Regardless of its economic and military incentives, Qatar has long challenged international security interests, sustaining Hamas and other terrorist groups. It is time that Qatar is designated as a State sponsor of terror, as has been done for other nations that have repeatedly provided support to terrorist’ organisations.

Foremost are Qatar’s ties to Hamas, an internationally designated terrorist group that avows Israel’s destruction. As one of Hamas’s largest funders, Qatar has provided the terrorist organization more than $1.1 billion since 2012. While Qatar often justifies its funding as humanitarian, the course of its funding, as well as the current emir’s statements, suggest different true motives.

Qatar’s emir has refused to regard Hamas as a terrorist organisation and has supported Hamas on the record. During a media interview, Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani proclaimed, “Qatar supports ‘all Palestinian people. We believe Hamas is a very important part of the Palestinian people.” Considering its support for Hamas, Qatar has often digressed from its supposed humanitarian cause, having explicitly funded the Hamas hierarchy. In reality, Qatar has been funding Hamas as recently as 2021, and has a long track record of sponsoring Hamas employees and the cash flow necessary to sustain Hamas’s bureaucracy and foundation.

The Qatari government has empowered and endorsed Hamas’s agenda by publishing full-blown Hamas conferences and speeches on its state-owned, state-funded network: Al-Jazeera. All one to do to verify this, is to search Al-Jazeera Mubasher (Al-Jazeera Live), a YouTube channel through which Al-Jazeera has streamed coverage of Hamas conferences and speeches.

Qatar has also provided safe-haven and funding for other organisations classified as terrorist organisations, either in UN or internationally. The Muslim Brotherhood, designated as a terrorist organisation by Bahrain, Egypt, Russia, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE has received more than $1 billion from the Qatari government.

Qatar has also given safe haven to high-ranking members of the Afghani Taliban and sponsored Ahrar al-Sham, a Syrian, Salafist militia that has previously fought alongside the terrorist group Jabhat al-Nusrah. Qatar’s major international charity, the Qatar Charitable Society (now known as the Qatar Charity) has acted as a financier and agency for terrorist outfits in several countries. It has funded al-Qaeda in Chechnya, Mali and elsewhere, was a key player in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and funded Syria’s Ahfad al-Rasul Brigade. Qatar has also financed terrorists in northern Mali operations, including Ansar Dine, alleged to be linked to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb [North Africa]; and it retains contacts with (and no doubt still funds) al-Qaeda.

Qatar’s ties to terrorism are long-established. By harbouring and bankrolling some of the world’s most notorious terrorist groups, Qatar has become, by any reasonable definition, a state-sponsor of terrorism.

Given Qatar’s economic and political clout, created by its sovereign wealth fund, its oil, and its ownership of the world’s third largest natural gas reserves, Qatar plays a role on the world stage and does much to enhance its public image. Qatar boasts the world’s second-largest gross domestic product per capita. The wealthy oil emirate operates Qatar Airways, one of the world’s largest airline. It hosts one of the world’s most influential state-sponsored news sources, Al Jazeera, and maintains significant influence in higher American education, donating more than $1.5 billion to some of America’s most well-known universities: University of Michigan, the University of North Carolina, Northwestern, Texas A&M, and Cornell.

In other spheres, Qatar is the single largest donor to the Brookings Institution, a major U.S. think tank that drives American foreign policy. Payments included $14.8 million after the former U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Martin Indyk, blamed Israel for the failure of the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks; and it has given money to many universities in the U.S. and Europe. Qatar also hosts eight international university campuses near Doha (Virginia Commonwealth, Weill Cornell, Texas A&M, Carnegie Mellon, Georgetown, Northwestern, HEC Paris, University College London, Calgary), and finances the RAND Policy Trust, another think-tank that influences U.S foreign policy. It owns expensive properties in London, the Barcelona Football Club, and dabbles in other areas worldwide.

While all this increases Qatar’s influence, most of it seems to be for show, in order to present a friendly face to the world. Qatar is not all gleaming towers, bars for non-Muslims, and a modern approach to social interactions. It remains the only other Wahhabi country in the world after Saudi Arabia. The problem here is the ‘Qatar paradox’. Although outwardly more liberal than the Saudis, the Qataris have surpassed them as financiers of extremism and terrorism. Just like the Saudis, it is traditional, devoted to a highly conservative form of Islam, and a full commitment to Islamic values.

Four branches of the Qatari government handle relations with the terrorist. These are the Foreign and Defence Ministries, the Intelligence Agency, and the personal office [al-Diwan al-Amiri], of the Emir of Qatar, who, as we have seen, flatly denies financing terrorism. Of course, Qatar does nothing directly. It prefers to use middlemen and to permit private individuals to do its dirty work.

Interestingly, leaders of Western nations threatened by these jihadist groups are happy to sit down with the largest financiers of terrorism in the world, offer them help, take as much money as they can, and smile for the cameras. They then sell to their public the crumbs from oil-rich monarchs who watch, wreathed in smiles, as the West shamelessly indulges itself in greed and has a total lack of concern for any human rights issues that this sheikhdom abuses in almost everything it does. The Qataris have money, they have power and influence, and they have an abiding love for fundamentalist Islam. They know what they are doing and they use their money to build political influence and strategic networks with the people in power in the West. Money talks, and in supine Western countries just coming out of a major recession, it talks very loudly.

Qatar is an equal opportunity terrorism supporter, which means that they support both Sunni and Shi’a terrorists. No other country is this prolific in its support to violent movements around the world. “Qatar’s security strategy has been to provide support to a wide range of regional and international groups in order to bolster its position at home and abroad.”

In addition to this is its motivation to be powerful and influential in countries that give it protection. Case in point is the U.S. Central Command’s Al-Udeid Air Base; which is the largest US military base outside continental USA, and home to 10,000 American soldiers and 120 different types of war planes. Since 2001, the U.S. Military has invested over $ 1 billion in modernizing the base facilities. Apart from the U.S, this air base also hosts the UK’s Royal Airforce squadrons. Basically, Qatar offers the Western militaries their permanent forward operating bases in return for international political protection. Another reason that both USA and UK are unwilling to censure Qatar is because it has provided funding to a variety of key politicians in the United States, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who received $1 million via the Clinton Foundation.

The UK has also benefited financially from Qatar’s huge investments in that country. Qatar buys London property while working against British interests across the world and funding the jihadists. Qatar partly owns 1 Hyde Park, London’s most expensive apartment block, and the Shard, the city’s tallest building. Qatari investors own more property in London UK, than the Mayor of London’s office and three times more than the Queen of England.

The following is a list of groups that Qatar supports with money, weapons, and other material support:

  • ISIS (in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Turkey, Egypt, and elsewhere in the world)
  • Numerous terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq who hold the same ideology as ISIS but are smaller in size
  • Al-Qa’ida
  • Houthis in Yemen (Shi’a militants)
  • Hamas
  • The Taliban (in Afghanistan–Also the Taliban was permitted to set up an official office in Doha)
  • The Muslim Brotherhood (worldwide)
  • Iranian militias (Shi’a)

Al Jazeera: A Propaganda Machine Masquerading as a News Network

Al Jazeera (“AJ”), the Doha based news network, is no stranger to controversy. They have been banned by multiple countries, and have received sanctions and/or faced legal challenges in others. From the Middle East to South Asia, the allegations range from indirectly spreading the supremacist ideology of Muslim Brotherhood (“Muslim Brotherhood controls Al Jazeera, says former Qatari PM in new leaked recording”, Al Arabiya, 23 June 2020) on the one hand, to outright acting as spokespersons for terrorist organizations on the other (“Al Jazeera continues to provide a platform to bigoted and violent extremists”, Arab News 26 May 2020).

Since the onset of the months-long diplomatic crisis between Qatar and a Saudi-led coalition of Gulf Arab states in 2017, the pan-Arab broadcaster has been on the defensive, deflecting accusations by Qatar’s detractors in the Gulf that the Doha-based news network is guilty of inciting violence.

Jordan and Saudi Arabia have already shuttered local Al Jazeera offices, and both the channel and its affiliated websites have been blocked in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Bahrain. They are also accused of duplicity, using pro-human rights language in their English outlets while using their Arabic language outlets for spreading radical ideologies and anti-Semitic propaganda.

Al-Jazeera is one of the most dangerous organisations in the world today. This organisation is committed to weakening democracies across the world, and they are doing it under the cloak of ordinary journalism. As a mouthpiece for Qatari Islamist ideals, Al Jazeera’s strength lies it in the adaptability of its sensationalism; each branch displays a unique approach to distorting news, disseminating propaganda, and boosting anti-Semitic and anti-American feeling on a daily basis. While Al Jazeera Arabic appeals to the Islamist hard Right in the Muslim world, Al Jazeera English encourages reasonable Centre-Left viewers in the West to adopt anti-Semitic and anti-American ideas, pitching anti-Semitism and hatred for America across the political gamut. They have now found a new target in India,a country that they can neither buy in bulk, nor influence politically.

Twenty-two years after its establishment, Al Jazeera has penetrated media and online information markets around the globe. With bureaus across the globe, broadcasts in several languages, multiple well-maintained, widely-followed and polished social media accounts and websites, investigative documentary film series, and even podcasts, Al Jazeera—and through it, the Qatari regime—has become a propaganda force with which to be reckoned.

Defeating Qatar’s actions against India will require a three-pronged effort. The 1st will be to declare Qatar as a terrorism sponsor nation. The 2nd will be to cut-off all ties; diplomatic, economic and trade with Qatar; and the 3rd will be to ensure that world is constantly reminded of Qatar’s duplicity in every international forum that India participates in. What the Al-Thani family desires glory, fame and influence. Deny these, and it will be reminded of its reality; that they are nothing more than cunning, lazy, illiterates whose forefathers use to wander the desert on camels and graze sheep, a life that they will have to return to when the world’s dependency on oil and LNG is comes to an end.

(The article was published on Organiser.org on November 07, 2023 and has been reproduced here)

Dragon diplomacy: Has China undermined the Bharat-Bhutan relationship?

0
(Image Source : First Post)
(Image Source : First Post)

When the King of Bhutan state visits India for eight long days, family and official entourage in tow, you can surmise something is amiss in the traditionally warm relationship. The status quo has been threatened by 25 rounds of border talks between China and Bhutan with two agreements signed, one a ‘three-step’ agreement in 2021, and another just a fortnight ago. Bhutan is about to establish diplomatic relations with China according to its Foreign Minister Tandi Dorji who led the talks in Beijing.

Ostensibly however, the King’s visit is to sell a brand new project expected to generate thousands of Bhutanese jobs even as its youth are restive about lack of opportunities in the land-locked kingdom.

Bhutan’s Prime Minister Lotay Tshering said Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the first King Wangchuck contacted on the ‘Gateway City’ project at Gelephu on its border with Assam. It is to become Bhutan’s first Smart City. After King Wangchuck met with Prime Minister Modi in New Delhi on 5 November, the Bhutanese prime minister announced India would give the project its full support.

Beijing has been leaning hard on Thimpu to settle the issue of the Doklam Plateau which contains the strategic tri-junction between China-Bhutan and India. It overlooks a narrow strip of land called ‘The Siliguri Corridor’ that connects India with its northeastern states.

Ever since the military stand-off with India in 2017 that lasted over 93 days, the Chinese have been building roads, bridges and townships on Bhutanese land on the plateau that it claims as its own. It has been seven years. India has done nothing about it unilaterally to avoid a flash point and Bhutan has been in no position to resist.

Also, there is a section of the Bhutanese people, particularly when China was doing better economically, who questioned the lack of diplomatic relations with China, a UNSC P5 country and what they saw as over-dependence on India.

Things are a little different again in 2023, when China is in an economic crisis and two countries, Italy and the Philippines, have recently pulled out of its BRI projects, even as a number of others are in disarray.

Pakistan, China’s so-called all-weather ally, is also facing its own difficulties on the brink of utter bankruptcy and the China-Pakistan CPEC is in deep trouble. It is also under attack by terrorists, both in Balochistan which contains the expensive China-built port of Gwadar and in central areas of Pakistan including Karachi. Many Chinese have been killed in Pakistan and the parts of the CPEC road that are ready are subject to frequent attack.

Bhutan would, no doubt, like to wriggle out of the dragon’s increasingly uncomfortable embrace under present circumstances. After all, it has the makings of a stranglehold that has been building ever since Chairman Mao claimed not only Tibet, which China occupied in 1950, but Bhutan, as Chinese territory too. Even now China claims large tracts of Bhutan along its borders and that is what these border talks have been unavoidably about.

To wriggle out of the dragon’s clutches then maybe a desire, but how is the question. Would an ambitious economic project, the first of its kind for Bhutan, be a method to balance its situation between China and India?

India is principally concerned with its own national interests, even as Bhutan has been conducting many rounds of border talks with China, inclusive of Bhutanese visits to China to hold them. So, to an extent, Bhutan seeks to leverage its geographical position and the new-found quasi-relationship with China.

However, the matter is delicate, because India has already calculated the consequences of China capturing the tri-junction area and how to deter it in the event it has designs on cutting off Indian access to its North East. The Doklam Plateau and the tri-junction area are in India’s advanced military sights, along with the narrow strip of Indian territory under 30-kilometre wide it overlooks. In addition, India has been building roads, airports, train lines, tunnels and bridges, for faster and better connectivity with its North East. It also enjoys a good relationship with Bangladesh. The neighbouring country is already providing river, sea and train connectivity to India in multiple places to promote trade and commerce between the two countries. All this combined with satellite and aerial surveillance, collectively and jointly blunts the Chinese threat at the tri-junction.

The King, Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, looked slightly sheepish of visage on arrival. His government’s border talks with China resulting in an agreement signed barely a fortnight ago, have not been objected to by India.

The King stopped first in bordering Assam on 3 November, where he was received by the expansive Himanta Biswa Sarma, the dynamic Chief Minister of Assam and a major influence in the states of the North East. King Wangchuck discussed infrastructure with Sarma, including a 57-kilometre rail line connecting Korajhar in Assam with Gelephu in Bhutan where an international airport is to be also built. The King will also visit Mumbai after New Delhi, where he will talk to prospective investors in in the Gelephu project, called the Sarpang Special Economic Zone.

He was received at the Delhi airport by a slightly stiff S Jaishankar, the storied Indian External Affairs Minister. Pictures have been released of Prime Minister Narendra Modi walking and talking unctuously with the King in the corridors of his 7 Lok Kalyan Marg residence. The Governments of India and Bhutan have been largely tightlipped about the actual bilateral and strategic talks between the two sides. This is understandable with China waiting to pick up clues.

However, a lot has changed. If China threatens India at the Doklam tri-junction, not only can it expect stiff resistance there, but it could find India acting in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir where China’s interests in Tibet and the Siachen could be compromised, along with the mouth of the CPEC from Xinjiang through Gilgit-Baltistan.

Geopolitically, it is India that is the darling of the West now, led by the US. It is not only a member of QUAD, with strong relationships with Japan and Australia in the neighbourhood, but a strategic and military collaborator/partner of the US and France in particular.

India maintains strong relationships with the Western bloc, which opposes China and its allies, including North Korea and Pakistan. Additionally, this bloc shares concerns about Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea and its stance on Taiwan. Its relationship with Iran and Russia now brooks alternatives. It has stood firmly with Israel against the terrorists from Hamas, without damaging its friendships with Egypt, the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

It is steadily drawing away parts of the supply chain from China, as in the production of Apple phones, and has halved imports across the board from China. It is also banning more and more Chinese apps, Chinese companies and has practically stopped Chinese investment in India. India is growing at almost 7 per cent in GDP year-on-year, the best performance amongst major economies in the world while China is struggling below 4 per cent.

The point of Bhutan’s situation is that India may have quietly bypassed its strategic concerns with the Himalayan kingdom. It is up to Bhutan to maintain the traditionally close relationship with India for its own sake. King Wangchuk realises this. Hopefully, he will return to Thimpu satisfied with India’s continuing and abiding interest in his picturesque country.

(The article was published on FirstPost.com on November 08, 2023 and has been reproduced here)

In this Rajasthan constituency, Congress candidate, a Muslim preacher’s son, is set to face off against a Hindu seer – the BJP candidate: How Pokaran voted in past

0
(Image Source : Opindia)
(Image Source : Opindia)

“In this Rajasthan constituency, Congress candidate, a Muslim preacher’s son, is set to face off against a Hindu seer – the BJP candidate: How Pokaran voted in past”, Opindia, November 8, 2023:

“The voting for Rajasthan Assembly Elections 2023 is scheduled for 25th November. The results will be announced on 3rd December with four other states, Mizoram, Chhattisgarh, Telangana and Madhya Pradesh. For Rajasthan, the assembly constituency Pokaran is expected to be a closely contested battle.

In the 2018 Assembly Elections, incumbent Congress MLA Saleh Mohammad won the seat with a thin margin of 872 seats. Mohammed, who is a Muslim preacher’s son, will face Swami Pratap Puri, a Hindu seer and Bharatiya Janata Party candidate. As both candidates have strong religious affiliations, experts believe it will be a close battle in Pokaran.

Mohammad serves as Minority Affairs Minister in the Congress-led Gehlot government in Rajasthan. He claimed that the development work done by the state government would move the voters away from religious considerations. He further claimed that the achievements of the current government in the region are substantial and urged the voters to choose development over religion…..”

Read the full article at Opindia.com

Hamas’ use of Children as human shields: Rocket launchers next to swimming pool and playground

0
hamas
(Image Source : Reuters)

“Hamas’ use of Children as human shields: Rocket Launchers next to swimming pool and playground”, Jihad Watch, November 7, 2023:

“Hamas uses civilians as human shields everywhere it can. It places its command-and-control centers, its rocket launchers, and its operatives, inside or near schools, hospitals, mosques, apartment houses, and playgrounds, where civilians become human shields.

The terror group knows how hard Israel tries to minimize civilian casualties, including warning people away from targets that the IDF is a about to hit, even if that allows enemy forces to escape, while Hamas does everything it can to maximize casualties, well aware of the propaganda value of dead Palestinian civilians.

Now the IDF has found inside Gaza rocket launchers situated very close to a child’s playground and a swimming pool. More on this story can be found here: “IDF says troops found Hamas rocket launchers near playground, swimming pool in Gaza,” by Emanuel Fabian, Times of Israel, November 5, 2023…..”

Read the full article at Jihadwatch.org