spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
20.4 C
Sringeri
Tuesday, July 1, 2025
Home Blog Page 3298

Muslim man shaves his own beard, but blames fictional hooligans on train – Baghpat, UP

0

Mohammed Farooq, a resident of Mughalpura in Baghpat, UP, had gone to visit a friend in Delhi on Thursday. Enroute, due to the intense summer heat he got his beard shaved off at a hair salon. But later than night when he returned home to Baghpat, fearing a backlash from his family & community about the missing beard, he cooked up a story about some people assaulting him on the train and shaving off his beard. He had also torn off his clothes for added effect.

His family bought the story and the news spread like wildfire in the area. Farooq’s brother tweeted a complaint to UP Police and tagged the UP CM Yogi Adityanath, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and media (Rajdeep Sardesai, Barkha Dutt, Ravish Kumar, Aaj Tak, NDTV).

Police swung into action and SP Pratap Gopendra Yadav questioned Farooq to investigate the issue. Unable to provide any facts or narrate a coherent sequence of events, Farooq soon broke down and admitted that no one had assaulted him and that he had himself got his beard shaved off. He begged forgiveness at the police station for creating a fake story.

Why lie over a beard?

Muslim men keep long beards as an adherence to the Sunnah (path, way of life) of Islam’s prophet Muhammad. Islamic ulema (religious scholars) say that a Muslim can live a truly righteous and Islamic life only if he/she follows in Muhammad’s footsteps in each and every sphere of life.

There are hadith (collection of sayings & practises of Muhammad as reported by his close companions, which constitute the major source of guidance for Muslims apart from the Koran) such as hadith of Ibn ‘Umar as per which Muhammad said: “Be different from the mushrikeen (sinners/idolators): let your beards grow and trim your moustaches.” Other hadith too convey the same meaning, which is to leave the beard as it is and let it grow long, and to trim the moustache.

Hence, shaving the beard is haram (forbidden) for truly observant Muslim men as several hadith forbid resembling the kafir (non-believer like Hindu).

And this incident is no one-off. Several such cases have come to light in recent times where Muslims accused they were targeted because of their faith, but the truth later proved otherwise. One new twist to the victimhood template is claiming the alleged attackers forced the Muslim victim to chant ‘Jai Sri Ram’, but again the truth is that it is the Hindus chanting ‘Jai Sri Ram’ who usually end up being the victims of radical Muslim/’secular’ mobs like here & here.

Muslim societies all over the world, and particularly those living in non-Islamic countries like Bharat, suffer from a persecution complex. Their religious clergy, leaders, intelligentsia – all combine to bombard the Muslim mind 24×7 with a message that non-Muslims are their eternal enemies and are always conspiring against the pure, God-fearing Muslim qaum (community/nation). The Islamic clergy also sanctions deception directed at non-Muslims, known by the Arabic term of taqiyya.

Left-liberal intellectuals & mainstream media in Bharat exacerbates the issue. Driven by an intense hatred of all things Hindu this influential class of elites is ever ready to reinforce the myriad grievances nursed by Muslim society, just to browbeat & shame Hindus.

Hence it is no surprise that the narrative within & without Bharat right now is one of growing ‘Hindu majoritarianism/fascism’ whereas the ground reality is entirely different. It is the Hindu who is being cleansed out of mixed-population areas of Western UP, Delhi NCR, West Bengal, Kerala; who is still diffident when it comes to demanding equal rights in core areas like education, managing religious institutions etc.


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Modi Trumps Pakistan

0
G7-Summit-Modi-donald-trump-pakistan-kashmir-370

Narendra Modi gave us a handshake to remember during the G7 Summit that took place in Biarritz, France this weekend. Bharat’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a meeting with President Donald Trump during the summit to discuss bilateral trade and the US-Bharat relationship. PM Modi was invited to the G7 as a special guest of French president Emmanuel Macron and certainly made his presence felt. He took the opportunity to clear up the air about the recent Kashmir issue.

Kashmir has always been strictly a bilateral issue between Bharat and Pakistan. Any foreign diplomat worth their salt knows about the Shimla agreement of 1972, that clearly outlines any issue to do with Kashmir will be resolved between the two parties involved- Bharat and Pakistan. Any third party involvement will not be welcome or legitimate.

Earlier, Trump had offered to “mediate” between Bharat and Pakistan during his meeting with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan. Diplomats and political scientists around the world were triggered, as it is well known what the red lines are with any issue around Kashmir. Trump does not have legal jurisprudence to offer any third party mediation and any such mediation will not bear any fruit nor will it be deemed legitimate.

So Trump’s offer of mediation would have been ill placed. However, what Trump can do and should be doing is to pressurise Pakistan to stop its export of terrorism into Bharat and its strategy of using terror as a diplomatic tool. During the same meeting with Trump, the Pakistani PM conceded that there are currently 45,000 terrorists operating in Pakistan. What he did not reveal was that most of these terrorists are somehow nurtured or connected to his country’s notorious spy agency ISI.

The US gives billions in aid every year to Pakistan for development, which sadly gets diverted to both their terror factories as well as their nuclear proliferation program. For 72 years, it has instigated and lost four wars with Bharat and conducted many terror attacks including one on Bharat’s parliament, cementing its position as the largest state sponsor of terrorists in the world.

Prime Minister Modi has made it very clear that Kashmir will be resolved bilaterally between the two countries. In fact, Jammu & Kashmir is truly an “internal matter” of Bharat and the illegally occupied area called POJK- “Pakistan occupied Jammu & Kashmir” is really the only issue up for bilateral resolution. The state of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) legally and legitimately joined the union of Bharat during the partition in 1947 and has been an integral part of Bharat since then.

On August 5th, 2019 the Bharatiya government revoked Article 370- a law that gave “special status” to J&K to have its own flag, anthem and constitution. This Article introduced in 1949 was meant to be temporary and transient, to be removed at a suitable future time. It sadly disconnected J&K with the rest of Bharat, leading to the state’s isolation from the rest of the country for 70 years. The removal of Article 370 fully integrated J&K into Bharat.

This revokes the status of J&K as an apartheid state, where Muslim-majority Kashmir valley dominated the politics of the entire state & the non-Muslim residents of J&K were treated as second class citizens and refugees in their own home state. It also removed the discriminatory, sexist and racist citizenship, property and inheritance laws that existed in the state for 70 years, which denied fundamental rights to women, Valmiki community sanitation workers, Gorkha soldiers, Hindu refugees from Pakistan and of course non-J&K citizens from the rest of the country. 

The issue of illegal occupation of parts of J&K does not stop with Pakistan. China surreptitiously annexed a region called Aksai Chin in the 1950s right from under Nehru’s nose. And then in 1963, Pakistan gifted the Shaksgam valley to China. Bharat needs to deal separately with China to get these two regions of J&K back. 

The Minister for External Affairs in Bharat, Mr. Jaishankar recently noted, “Bharat’s relationship with China is one of the future. But Pakistan is an unusual neighbor and a peculiar problem. It is the only country in the world that uses terrorism as a diplomatic tool.”

Trump made a noticeable U-turn on his original offer of ‘mediation’, and has agreed that Kashmir is in good hands and will need to be resolved between Bharat & Pakistan.

Modi’s handshake with and cheeky backslap to Trump is assertive, confident and indicative of the strong diplomatic ties between Bharat and the USA. It also reiterates the international community standing with Bharat in its internal matters over J&K, isolating Pakistan just like the UN did a week ago. In a sense, Modi is saying, “Back off, we got this”!


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Application of Two-Nation Theory to Kashmir by the British- How Gilgit-Baltistan was lost to Bharat

0
nehru-sardar-patel

The original Himalayan Blunder was with regard to the Gilgit Agency and the Wazarat, which many don’t even remember. Gilgit-Baltistan, as we know it today comprised Gilgit Agency and Gilgit Wazarat back in 1947.

A lot has been written about the Himalayan Blunder committed by Bharat in 1962. Even more has been written about the blunders committed in the prosecution of the Kashmir War of 1947, notably the reference to the United Nations by Jawaharlal Nehru at a time Bharat was gaining momentum in the war. Poonch had been secured. Enemy forces had been chased away from the outskirts of Leh and Kargil had been won back. The Poonch-Uri road had been secured. Bharat only needed a last push to capture Skardu back and take Muzaffarabad and Mirpur.

History would also tell you that Jammu and Kashmir was also the only princely state which was not under the charge of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. Kashmir was a separate Ministry under the Government of Bharat and was directly under the charge of Prime Minister Nehru.

I would not labour the oft repeated events that pre-dated the accession of Kashmir to Bharat. I begin at the point of accession.

There is a fine account by Late Field Marshal Manek Shaw who was then the Director of Military Operations in the Army HQ in the rank of a Colonel. General Sir Roy Bucher, the C-in-C of the Bharatiya Army sent him to accompany VP Menon who was flying to Srinagar to get the Instrument of Accession signed.

The Kabaili tribals were hardly 10–12 kms away from the Srinagar airfield. They came back on 25th Oct, and it is worth recalling in Manek Shaw’s own words what happened the next morning in a meeting of the Cabinet Defence Committee:

“At the morning meeting he handed over the (Accession) thing. Mountbatten turned around and said, ‘come on Manekji (He called me Manekji instead of Manekshaw), what is the military situation?’ I gave him the military situation, and told him that unless we flew in troops immediately, we would have lost Srinagar, because going by road would take days, and once the tribesmen got to the airport and Srinagar, we couldn’t fly troops in. Everything was ready at the airport.

As usual Nehru talked about the United Nations, Russia, Africa, God almighty, everybody, until Sardar Patel lost his temper. He said, ‘Jawaharlal, do you want Kashmir, or do you want to give it away’. He (Nehru) said,’ Of course, I want Kashmir (emphasis in original). Then he (Patel) said ‘Please give your orders’. And before he could say anything Sardar Patel turned to me and said, ‘You have got your orders’.

I walked out, and we started flying in troops at about 11 o’clock or 12 o’clock. I think it was the Sikh regiment under Ranjit Rai that was the first lot to be flown in. And then we continued flying troops in. That is all I know about what happened. Then all the fighting took place. I became a brigadier, and became director of military operations and also if you will see the first signal to be signed ordering the cease-fire on 1 January (1949) had been signed by Colonel Manekshaw on behalf of C-in-C India, General Sir Roy Bucher. That must be lying in the Military Operations Directorate.”

One more event of great momentous consequence had already taken place.

Maharaja’s forces broadly comprised 50 per cent Muslims and 50 per cent Hindus. Manek Shaw records that the Muslim elements of Maharaja’s forces had revolted.

This position was known both to the Army and the political leadership. However, they got so busy looking after Srinagar that they forgot completely about both the Gilgit Agency and the Wazarat.

A bit of background may be called for at this point.

The princely State of Kashmir and Jammu (as opposed to J&K of today), had five main regions — Jammu with Jammu as HQ, Kashmir with Srinagar as HQ, Ladakh with Leh as summer HQ, and Skardu as winter HQ, Gilgit Wazarat with Astore as HQ, and Gilgit Agency on a 60 year lease to the British from 1935.

Gilgit Agency comprised Chilas, Gilgit, Yasin, Ghizr, Iskoman, Hunza and Nagar valley. All areas east of Bunji were in the Wazarat which was directly administered. As the Great Game was unfolding in Central Asia, and Britain was getting more and more obsessed with the threat of Communist Soviet Union, they thought it fit to administer this part of Maharaja’s State directly and accordingly took it on lease in 1935.

As the Indian Independence Act was passed by the British Parliament on 13 July 1947 and the date of transfer of power to Bharat and Pakistan was set to 15 August, Mountbatten decided to let go of the Gilgit Agency lease.

On the 1st of August, administration of Gilgit passed back into the hands of Maharaja, a responsibility he was simply not up to discharging. He had a British Chief of Army Staff, Major General Scott. Scott had just two battalions around Gilgit. A battalion of Gilgit Scouts which was a British force and another battalion of 6, Kashmir infantry stationed around 50 kms away at Bunji on the eastern bank of Indus in the Wazarat area.

Gilgit Scouts was a 100 percent Muslim force. It had one HQ Company stationed in Gilgit and ten platoons contributed by the various Rajas. 6th Kashmir infantry at Bunji on the left bank of Indus had 2 Dogra and Sikh companies and one Muslim company. General Scott sought a British officer to command the Gilgit Scouts as the force was 100 per cent Muslim and a Hindu might find it difficult to command it, and for obvious reasons, a Muslim could not be trusted in the situation that prevailed.

So Scott marshaled his resources and got a British Captain who was then posted in Chitral, and also accepted his recommendation to have another British officer working under him at Chilas.

The biggest advantage that Pakistan had over Bharat in Kashmir was that there was not a single road or rail route that connected Bharat with J&K. Srinagar was accessed from Rawalpindi, through Murrie and Muzaffarabad (The road to Muzaffarabad bye-passes Murrie today).

Poonch road was through the town of Gujrat after crossing the Chenab at Wazirabad. Even the road to Jammu was Amritsar-Sialkot-Jammu. Jammu had a light railway too. It ran from Wazirabad Junction on the main Lahore-Rawalpindi broad gauge line through Sialkot to Jammu. Gilgit and Skardu were both accessed through Rawalpindi-Abbottabad road which crossed into Gilgit agency at the 4200 metre Babusar pass and joined the Indus at Chilas, the HQ of Daimer district today.

If the Babusar pass was closed due to snow, then there was the alternative route along the Indus valley which is the present alignment of the Karakoram Highway.

From Chilas, the road went through Bunji upto the place where Gilgit River joins the Indus, from where Indus upstream goes further north until it hits the Karakoram Range and turns south south-east near Sassi.

It went on to Skardu, from where another road along Indus, Shingo and Suru valleys joins up with Kargil. The other route took off from the Gilgit-Indus confluence and went up to Shandur pass in the West from where it crossed into Chitral, a Muslim princely State.

The river Hunza meets the Gilgit River at Gilgit. The road along Hunza valley led to the vassal States of Hunza and Nagar. The present Karakoram Highway is along this alignment going further into Chinese Turkestan over the Khunjerab pass.

The Gilgit-Indus confluence has the unique geographical feature of three of the greatest ranges — Himalayas, Karakoram and Hindukush meeting at one place.

The route from Jammu to Gilgit and Skardu via Srinagar was open only during summers as it was not possible to cross the Pir Panjal during winters. Also, going to Gilgit Wazarat’s capital Astore involved crossing the rivers Sind and Kishanganga, before going up to the Burzil Pass through Mini Margh.

Even the flights in small turbo prop planes had to first go to Peshawar from Srinagar before refueling and taking the route up along the Indus valley.

It is here that the big blunder took place.

Major William Alexander Brown, the commander of the Gilgit Scouts had one singular merit, not unlike many other Englishmen. He kept a diary. This was later published as his memoirs.

A look through the memoirs reveals his mindset. Right from day one of his taking over as Commander at Gilgit, he had a political agenda. When the lease of Gilgit Agency was prematurely terminated by Mountbatten and Maharaja formally resumed his territory, Major Brown was inducted as an officer of the Kashmir and Jammu Army.

Brigadier Ghansara Singh of the Maharaja’s Army was sent in as the Governor. Brown derides him as incompetent and lazy. Brown’s memoirs cannot be taken at their face value as he was always scheming against the Maharaja.

In early September, he had decided to support Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan. He has mentioned in his diary that he had his mind made up that in case Maharaja decided to accede to Bharat, he would be with his Muslim soldiers and would mount a mutiny.

Brigadier Ghansara Singh did not size up the situation well. The 6th Kashmir Infantry based at Bunji had 3 battalions, one of which was a Muslim battalion. Everyone knew how Muslim battalions had deserted the Kashmir forces in the various mutinies which occurred from Poonch to Muzaffarabad to Baramula. Gilgit Scouts had an unconventional formation of an HQ company and ten platoons. These were widely distributed at Gupis, Chilas and Gilgit.

After the accession had been achieved and Bharatiya troops had taken control, Gilgit should have been immediately secured through an air bridge as was Srinagar.

Had Gilgit been secured, every other garrison in Gilgit Baltistan would have become safe including Skardu and Ladakh Agency. This blunder was committed as much by the Kashmir Army, as by the Bharatiya Army and Bharat’s political leadership.

Gilgit had a small air strip which could have taken small aircrafts, but Skardu had a fairly long airstrip. An airlift of the size which occurred in Srinagar was militarily not possible, but induction of Bharatiya Army and its commanders was an urgent imperative.

As things transpired later on, Major Brown led the mutiny of Gilgit Scouts as he had intended to, right from November onwards. The Kashmiri Governor, Brigadier Ghansara Singh was arrested by Major Brown. The Muslim company of 6th Kashmir Infantry also mutinied, as they had already been compromised by Major Brown.

The remainder of the 6th Kashmir Infantry were chased away from Bunji, Pakistan flag was unfurled at Gilgit on 1st November, 1947 and for 3 weeks Gilgit was an independent entity till Pakistan sent its Governor there. Thus, the way was opened for the whole of Gilgit and a major part of Baltistan to be occupied by Pakistan.

Major Brown directed the entire operations into Gilgit-Baltistan until he was relieved in January 1948. After the fall of Gilgit, every man in Kashmir knew that Skardu would be the next target.

Gen. Thimayya is on record that he considered Skardu to be the last frontier in the battle to save Ladakh. Yet, no airlift occurred till the Kashmir Forces in Skardu under that great soldier Sher Jung Thapa had been besieged in February by Gilgit Scouts and Chitral Bodyguards.

This failure to resupply and relieve the garrisons at Gilgit and Skardu immediately after the airlift of Srinagar were great military blunders, besides political ones.

A sagacious Army commander, which General Sir Roy Bucher probably was, should have proceeded to defend Skardu and Gilgit through an air bridge. We are, however, not sure how much of his heart he had in this war.

Pakistanis similarly blame General Sir Douglas Gracey, the Pakistan Commander-in-Chief. It was a great error of judgment on part of Maharaja to entrust his forces to English officers, and to place trust in Muslim companies and battalions when they were deserting everywhere.

The saga of rape and murder of Bharatiyas in Bunji and Skardu need to be retold to all the Bharatiyas today so that they would know how Pakistan forces fight, and how misplaced their sense of fair play is when it comes to Pakistan, whether with their forces or their public.

Narendra Modi and Doval have sized up the situation correctly. I am sure that if it had been Modi and Doval in 1972, they would not have let the advantage of having 90,000 POWs melt away without wresting away some major part of Pakistan, or without breaking up Pakistan. A War Crime Tribunal would have broken up Pakistan at that time.

My two bits about the present situation is that this great Ummah feeling has completely disappeared from Gilgit-Baltistan today. Shias and Ismailis are persecuted, and Sunnis are being increasingly seen as a colonizing force.

We need not have any illusions about the population in these parts, but it is certain that the way to conquer Pakistan Occupied Kashmir is not through Muzaffarabad, but through Khapalu and Skardu. Bharat will have to militarily conquer PoK not through the Jhelum, but through the Shyok.

This is true not only in territorial terms, but also in terms of minds of people. The areas of Baltistan conquered by the Ladakh Scouts in 1971, under that redoubtable soldier, Colonel Chewang Rinchen, are today completely amalgamated in the Bharatiya Union. If the 1971 war had lasted another week, Ladakh Scouts would have liberated Skardu as well. The Nubra segment in the Parliamentary constituency of Ladakh overwhelmingly voted for a BJP candidate in the 2019 General Elections.

Let us hope for taking the Khapalu, Skardu, and Shigar area in the Bharatiya Union soon. After that, Shaksgam Valley, ceded to China by Pakistan in in 1963, would be thrown open.

-by Sanjay Dixit

(This article was first published on medium.com on August 29, 2019 and has been reproduced here in full with minor change – reference to ‘India’ has been replaced with ‘Bharat’.)


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Threads 2019: Celebrating the Hindu-American Saga

0

Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) is organizing “Threads 2019: Share, Appreciate and Engage to Shape a Collective Future” a unique conference to explore and chronicle the contributions of Hindus to America and pay tribute to America and its warm embrace of Hindus. The conference will be held from November 1-3, 2019, in Boston, MA.

Threads 2019 will bring together a community that is maturing and making its mark every day in America. Speakers who are leaders, scholars and leading lights in various aspects of life – philanthropy, science, arts, technology, media, business, medicine and academia – will narrate their story so each thread can be picked up and woven into a fabric that tells the larger tale of the impact of Hindus on American society.

Hindus immigrated to the United States of America from all corners of the world and are deeply interwoven in the fabric of America today. They have enriched the American tapestry with diverse and far ranging contributions.

Threads aims to chronicle the story of their assimilation and contributions. Their inspiring story is in fact a tribute to America, which has embraced them with open arms as they fulfill their aspirations of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness in this wonderful land of opportunities.

Threads brings together Hindu-American thinkers, artists, educators, writers, public policy makers, scientists, medical professionals, entrepreneurs and business leaders on one platform – for a singular purpose: to share their stories, to celebrate their accomplishments and engage with each other, and share ideas for a brighter and better America of tomorrow.

The conference will feature inspiring personalities from an array of fields as keynote speakers, panelists and poster presenters, and will cover a broad range of topics.

Threads 2019 registration is Now Open – click here to register


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

3 Cattle Smugglers – Arif, Israr, Kalua – gangrape a 10-year-old girl in Etah, UP

0
Kidnapped Raped 4-year-old raped & sodomized Sexual Assault

Three cattle smugglers abducted a 10-year-old girl from her home and then brutally gang-raped her at an isolated spot, reports Hindi language daily Patrika.

This ghastly crime occurred in Avagarh area of Etha district, UP. According to police, the 3 accused – Arif, Israr, Kalua – are professional cattle smugglers who have dozens of cases lodged against them. They have been arrested and jailed several times before in cases related to cattle smuggling in Etah, Agra, Kasganj and other districts.

The accused, who were out to steal cattle from people’s homes, spotted the 10-year-old victim alone at home. They abducted and took the child to a tubewell in a nearby field and proceeded to rape her one by one, before fleeing from the spot.

They were later arrested by police and are being prosecuted under IPC 376 (gangrape) and POCSO Act.

Well-armed cattle smuggling gangs are a terror in several parts of North Bharat. This inter-state mafia, which has operated with impunity for decades due to overt/covert protection from ‘secular’ politicians and a negligent law enforcement machinery, routinely kills villagers & police and has now even started sexually assaulting women & children.

It is time that the country’s Home Minister turns his attention to tackling this serious issue, which has forced ordinary villagers to turn into vigilantes. Police modernization coupled with a crack-down on the beef mafia will go a long way in not just improving the law & order situation, but also eliminate the social friction this illegal trade generates.

It will also shut up shop of the vested interests in Lutyens’ Delhi who often portray these dangerous smugglers as ‘dairy farmers’ or ‘cattle transporters’ to peddle their propaganda that Hindus are killing Muslims for eating beef in Modi’s India.


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Bharat, a land of great Acharyas – thinkers, scientists & teachers

0
bharat

Bharat is an ancient civilization that enriched the world in a number of different ways and fields with its inventions and discoveries. Although Bharat is known as a land of spirituality, our ancestors were far advanced in numerous fields. Our Rishis were experts in fields as diverse as mathematics to astronomy and language to medicine. They harnessed these powers and made many scientific discoveries. These were used to make the lives of ordinary citizens easy. 

Here we will learn about some of Bharat’s great Rishis who were also scientists, mathematicians, astronomers and medical experts who enriched the world with their discoveries and inventions.

01) Bhaskaracharya (600-680 CE)

Bhaskaracharya, also known as Bhaskara I, was a mathematician and astronomer who lived in the 7th century. He wrote Aryabhatiyabhasya in 629 CE which is the oldest known Sanskrit prose work on mathematics and astronomy. His other works are Mahabhaskariya and Laghubhaskariya. Interestingly, it was Bhaskara who first used 0 as a symbol for Zero. Bharat’s space organization Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) honoured the Acharya by launching a satellite Bhaskara I in his name in the year 1979.

02) Charaka (300 BCE)

Acharya Charaka wrote the Charaka Samhita, an Ayurvedic medical treatise divided into 8 books and consisting of 120 chapters. Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita are considered the basic texts of Ayurveda. Charaka is rightly known as the father of Bharatiya medicine. The Samhita provided cures for diseases related to almost all body parts and contains descriptions of around 1,00,000 herbal plants along with their medicinal values and functions. 

03) Aryabhatta (476-550 CE)

Aryabhatta was born in Patna during the Gupta Era which is considered to be the golden age of ancient Bharat. He was a mathematician and astronomer who wrote Aryabhatiya and Arya-Siddhanta. Some of his notable concepts are the explanation of lunar and solar eclipses, the rotation of the earth on its axis and the reflection of the sun’s light by the moon and the calculation of the value of pi accurately up to 4 decimal places, the diameter of the earth and correct calculation of the length of the sidereal year. Bharat’s very first satellite launched in 1975 was called Aryabhatta as a tribute to this great Acharya. 

04) Sushruta (600 BCE)

An ancient Bharatiya physician who is known as the father of surgery, Sushruta is said to be the son of Rishi Vishvamitra (as mentioned in Mahabharata). He authored Sushruta Samhita which contains chapters on surgical training, instruments and procedures in addition to descriptions of medicinal plants and their uses, types of diseases and their cures and various types of fractures. Readers would be surprised to know that plastic surgery is not a modern concept but one which finds mention in this ancient text.

05) Kanad (somewhere between the 6th and 4th century BCE)

What if I were to tell you that atomic theory was known to our ancient Rishis and was put forth 2,500 years before English physicist John Dalton came up with the concept? Unbelievable, right? The truth is that Acharya Kanad, founder of the Vaisheshika School of Philosophy and author of Vaisheshik Darshan, came up with the atomic theory and explained the properties of anu and parmanu.

06) Panini (4th Century BCE)

Panini is an ancient grammarian who authored Ashtadhyayi which is a treatise on Sanskrit grammar divided into 8 chapters with 3959 verses explaining the rules of linguistics, syntax and semantics. He formalized language which made Sanskrit the main language of learning and literature for about 2000 years. Several modern linguistic theories of Bharatiya languages are based on Panini’s analysis of noun compounds.

07) Kapila (3000 BCE)

Rishi Kapila founded the Sankhya School of Hindu philosophy. He is called the father of Cosmology. He explained the nature and principles of Purusha and Prakriti and how the combination of the two is the basis of cosmic creation as well as all energies. 

08) Varahamihira (505-587 CE)

He lived during the Gupta Era and was known for authoring works such as Brihat-Samhita, Brihat-Jataka and Pancha-Siddhantika. Brihat-Samhita is a very exhaustive work which covers topics such as architecture, eclipses, agriculture, astrology, mathematics, timekeeping and planetary motions among others. The most important text authored by Varahamihira is Pancha-Siddhantika a treatise on mathematical astronomy which compiles five important previous astronomical treatises. These five are Surya Siddhanta, Romaka Siddhanta, Paulisa Siddhanta, Vashishta Siddhanta and Paitamaha Siddhanta.

09) Brahmagupt (598-668 CE)

He was a mathematician and astronomer born in Ujjain located in modern-day Madhya Pradesh. He wrote Brahmasphutasiddhanta and Khandakhadyaka. He was the first to put forward rules for computing with zero. He is also credited for the modern number system and many other mathematical formulae. 

10) Patanjali

Yoga is a universal practice today. However, it was Maharishi Patanjali who wrote the Yog Sutras which is a text on the theory and practice of Yog. The Yog Sutras of Patanjali consist of 196 sutras and were translated into as many as 40 Bharatiya and 2 foreign (Old Javanese and Arabic) languages.

11) Pingala (3rd or 2nd century BCE)

Acharya Pingala was a mathematician and Sanskrit grammarian. He authored Chandasastra (Pingala Sutras) which is a treatise on Sanskrit prosody (study of poetic metres and verses). His other notable concepts include his works on binary numeral systems and arithmetical triangles.

12) Bhaskara II (1114-1185 CE)

Bhaskara was a 12th-century astronomer and mathematician born in modern-day Karnataka. He made notable contributions to the field of mathematics and astronomy. His main work is Siddhanta Shiromani which is divided into four sections dealing with arithmetic, algebra, and maths of planets and spheres. His work on the law of gravity & calculus predated that of Newton and Leibniz by more than 500 years. ISRO honoured the astronomer and mathematician by launching the satellite Bhaskara II in 1981.

13) Baudhayana (around 800 BCE)

He is the author of Sulbasutras which provided rules for the construction of altars necessary for sacrifices. His work basically provides rules for religious rites. Besides being a Vedic priest, Baudhayana was a skilled craftsman who put mathematics to practical use by constructing sacrificial altars of the best quality. Sulbasutras along with five other texts form Baudhayana Sutras which are a group of Vedic Sanskrit texts covering dharma, daily ritual, mathematics etc. Srautasutra, Karmantasutra, Dvaidhasutra, Grihyasutra, Dharmasutra and Sulbasutra together form Baudhayana Sutras. 

14) Kautilya (371-283 BCE)

We all know Acharya Kautilya or Vishnugupta as Chanakya; who is best known as the Guru of Chandragupta Maurya. Besides being a philosopher and jurist, Chanakya was an economist par excellence. He wrote Arthashastra and Chanakya Niti. Arthashastra deals with foreign policies, war strategies, international relations and monetary and fiscal policies. Chanakya Niti is a text that contains Acharya Chanakya’s maxims on life.

We are so fascinated by the West, in addition to not having learnt Sanskrit, that we don’t even know that our ancestors put forth scientific, astronomical, mathematical and other theories centuries before scientists and thinkers from the West. Many of the concepts were carried from Bharat to the West either by Greek travellers or Arab traders to foreign shores, contributing in no small measure to the European Renaissance from the 15th century onwards. Sanskrit, being the language of communication and writing in the past, is important for us to learn if we are to understand the thoughts of our ancestors which hold true even today. 

This list is, of course, by no means exhaustive but I hope it would provide us with a glimpse of the genius minds that made Bharat a land of knowledge.

The Ramanujan Summation: 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + ∞ = -1/12?

2

“What on earth are you talking about? There’s no way that’s true!” — My mom

This is what my mom said to me when I told her about this little mathematical anomaly. And it is just that, an anomaly. After all, it defies basic logic. How could adding positive numbers equal not only a negative, but a negative fraction? What the frac?

Before I begin: It has been pointed out to me that when I talk about sum’s in this article, it is not in the traditional sense of the word. This is because all the series I deal with naturally do not tend to a specific number, so we talk about a different type of sums, namely Cesàro Summations.

For anyone interested in the mathematics, Cesàro summations assign values to some infinite sums that do not converge in the usual sense. “The Cesàro sum is defined as the limit, as n tends to infinity, of the sequence of arithmetic means of the first n partial sums of the series” — Wikipedia.

I also want to say that throughout this article I deal with the concept of countable infinity, a different type of infinity that deals with a infinite set of numbers, but one where if given enough time you could count to any number in the set. It allows me to use some of the regular properties of mathematics like commutativity in my equations (which is an axiom I use throughout the article).

Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920) was a Bharatiya mathematician

For those of you who are unfamiliar with this series, which has come to be known as the Ramanujan Summation after a famous Bharatiya mathematician named Srinivasa Ramanujan, it states that if you add all the natural numbers, that is 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on, all the way to infinity, you will find that it is equal to -1/12. Yup, -0.08333333333.

Don’t believe me? Keep reading to find out how I prove this, by proving two equally crazy claims:

  1. 1–1+1–1+1–1 ⋯ = 1/2
  2. 1–2+3–4+5–6⋯ = 1/4

First off, the bread and butter. This is where the real magic happens, in fact the other two proofs aren’t possible without this.

I start with a series, A, which is equal to 1–1+1–1+1–1 repeated an infinite number of times. I’ll write it as such:

A = 1–1+1–1+1–1⋯

Then I do a neat little trick. I take away A from 1

1-A=1-(1–1+1–1+1–1⋯)

So far so good? Now here is where the wizardry happens. If I simplify the right side of the equation, I get something very peculiar:

1-A=1–1+1–1+1–1+1⋯

Look familiar? In case you missed it, thats A. Yes, there on that right side of the equation, is the series we started off with. So I can substitute A for that right side, do a bit of high school algebra and boom!

1-A =A

1-A+A=A+A

1 = 2A

1/2 = A

This little beauty is Grandi’s series, called such after the Italian mathematician, philosopher, and priest Guido Grandi. That’s really everything this series has, and while it is my personal favourite, there isn’t a cool history or discovery story behind this. However, it does open the door to proving a lot of interesting things, including a very important equation for quantum mechanics and even string theory. But more on that later. For now, we move onto proving #2: 1–2+3–4+5–6⋯ = 1/4.

We start the same way as above, letting the series B =1–2+3–4+5–6⋯. Then we can start to play around with it. This time, instead of subtracting B from 1, we are going to subtract it from A. Mathematically, we get this:

A-B = (1–1+1–1+1–1⋯) — (1–2+3–4+5–6⋯)

A-B = (1–1+1–1+1–1⋯) — 1+2–3+4–5+6⋯

Then we shuffle the terms around a little bit, and we see another interesting pattern emerge.

A-B = (1–1) + (–1+2) +(1–3) + (–1+4) + (1–5) + (–1+6)⋯

A-B = 0+1–2+3–4+5⋯

Once again, we get the series we started off with, and from before, we know that A = 1/2, so we use some more basic algebra and prove our second mind blowing fact of today.

A-B = B

A = 2B

1/2 = 2B

1/4 = B

And voila! This equation does not have a fancy name, since it has proven by many mathematicians over the years while simultaneously being labeled a paradoxical equation. Nevertheless, it sparked a debate amongst academics at the time, and even helped extend Euler’s research in the Basel Problem and lead towards important mathematical functions like the Reimann Zeta function.

Now for the icing on the cake, the one you’ve been waiting for, the big cheese. Once again we start by letting the series C = 1+2+3+4+5+6⋯, and you may have been able to guess it, we are going to subtract C from B.

B-C = (1–2+3–4+5–6⋯)-(1+2+3+4+5+6⋯)

Because Math is still awesome, we are going to rearrange the order of some of the numbers in here so we get something that looks familiar, but probably won’t be what you are suspecting.

B-C = (1-2+3-4+5-6⋯)-1-2-3-4-5-6⋯

B-C = (1-1) + (-2-2) + (3-3) + (-4-4) + (5-5) + (-6-6) ⋯

B-C = 0-4+0-8+0-12⋯

B-C = -4-8-12⋯

Not what you were expecting right? Well hold on to your socks, because I have one last trick up my sleeve that is going to make it all worth it. If you notice, all the terms on the right side are multiples of -4, so we can pull out that constant factor, and lo n’ behold, we get what we started with.

B-C = -4(1+2+3)⋯

B-C = -4C

B = -3C

And since we have a value for B=1/4, we simply put that value in and we get our magical result:

1/4 = -3C

1/-12 = C or C = -1/12

Now, why this is important. Well for starters, it is used in string theory. Not the Stephen Hawking version unfortunately, but actually in the original version of string theory (called Bosonic String Theory). Now unfortunately Bosonic string theory has been somewhat outmoded by the current area of interest, called supersymmetric string theory, but the original theory still has its uses in understanding superstrings, which are integral parts of the aforementioned updated string theory.

The Ramanujan Summation also has had a big impact in the area of general physics, specifically in the solution to the phenomenon known as the Casimir Effect. Hendrik Casimir predicted that given two uncharged conductive plates placed in a vacuum, there exists an attractive force between these plates due to the presence of virtual particles bread by quantum fluctuations. In Casimir’s solution, he uses the very sum we just proved to model the amount of energy between the plates. And there is the reason why this value is so important.

So there you have it, the Ramanujan summation, that was discovered in the early 1900’s, which is still making an impact almost 100 years on in many different branches of physics, and can still win a bet against people who are none the wiser.

P.S. If you are still interested and want to read more, here is a conversation with two physicists trying to explain this crazy equation and their views on it’s usefulness and validity. It’s nice and short, and very interesting.

-by Mark Dodds

(This article was first published on medium.com on September 3, 2018 and has been reproduced here with minor change- references to ‘India’ has been changed to ‘Bharat’) 


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

Reasons behind anti-Hindi protests in Tamil Nadu

0
tamil-nadu-politics

Anti-Hindi protests in Tamil Nadu are simply unwarranted. After all, implementation of 3 language formula as advocated by NEP, is just a draft proposal that has been put in public domain for wider consultations and discussions. It is not for the first time that such an issue has cropped up; the nation has vivid memories of the turmoil and violence that occurred during the anti-Hindi demonstrations in Tamil Nadu in the fifties and the sixties.

As a matter of fact, the very organization of states in Bharat on linguistic basis has engendered regionalism and ‘sons of the soil’ attitude bordering on sub-nationalism at times. It would have been much better had the states been reorganized on the basis of geography and financial sustainability as this would have facilitated more development. But though the union government can alter and change the boundaries of states and rename them by a simple majority of votes in Parliament as per constitution, the clock can’t be reversed due to adverse socio-political ramifications.

Surprisingly, other southern states like Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Kerala do not have so much disdain towards Hindi as the Tamilians and slowly but steadily, they have started accepting Hindi as a link language with the rest of the country. Why is the case of Tamil Nadu so different?

The fault lies in the nature of Dravidian polity. The edifice of the Dravidian movement has been built on hatred against the North Bharatiya culture, disdain towards the Brahmins and protest against the alleged imposition of Hindi. Right after independence, the leader of the Dravidian movement Periyar harboured dreams of establishing an independent Dravida land comprising of all the south Bharatiya states.

He was more supportive of the imperial power than the national freedom movement which, for him, was simply a movement to impose the hegemony of Brahmins over the Bharatiya landscape once the Britishers left Bharat. However, the Dravidian movement failed to transcend the boundaries of Tamil Nadu but to its credit, Dravidian parties like DMK and later on AIADMK wiped out the national parties electorally from the state.

Post 1967, both the main Dravidian parties have ruled the state continuously without ceding any ground to either Congress or BJP though at the national level, these parties have no aversion to entering into alliances with pan Bharat parties to be part of coalition governments. Inward looking Dravidian parties have always resisted the national mainstream and taken pride in the exclusivity of their cultural identity.

Though the goal of the Dravidian movement has been social revolution, facts prove otherwise as Tamil Nadu has become the den of caste politics. Intermediate and OBC castes like Grounders, Vanniyars, Thevars etc have wielded political power while Dalits have been marginalized to the periphery. Not only this, Dalits have suffered atrocities at the hands of powerful intermediate & OBC castes like Vanniyars from time to time which have scoffed at Dalit assertion.

Dalit parties like VCK or Panthers are still on the fringe. Construction of a caste wall in Uthapuram to segregate the Dalit population attracted national headlines while violence against dalits at places like Dharmapuri are not isolated incidents.

Isn’t it pathetic that despite the passage of more than 70 years since the onset of the Dravidian revolution, the state has seen no Dalit CM? The anti-Dalit feudal character of the Dravidian parties is hidden just because from time to time, these parties launch radical welfare programs like Mid-Day Meal and distribute free TV sets and free Washing machines to the Dalits in the glare of cameras.

If Dravidian movement was about egalitarianism and social transformation, why have the structural measures like land reforms in favour of the Dalits not undertaken? The harsh reality is that Dravidian movement was designed with the sole purpose of ending the monopoly of Brahmins in social, political and cultural matters. The Dravidians have proved far worse than the much-reviled Brahmins when comes to subjugation of Dalit rights.

The Dravidian parties targeted Brahmins because as the custodians of the Hindu culture and religion, the Brahmins maintained the organic linkage of the Tamils with the rest of the country and by virtue of a head start in education, they dominated the Tamil society intellectually and politically.

Parties like DMK and AIADMK have tried to carve out a distinct autonomous Dravida identity to perpetuate their domination and keep the state secluded socially and culturally from Bharat’s landmass. The protest against Hindi should be seen in this context. DMK and AIADMK do not want BJP to gain a footprint in the state. Nationalism and Hindutva are anathema for them.

Dravidian politics has murdered the soul of Tamil Nadu by contemplating to disconnect the state from the past. The Sangam literature composed in ancient times talked about worship of Vishnu, Shiva and Indra and mentions Ganges as the sacred river besides referring to Hindu rituals, festivals, Vedic sacrifices and even funerals. Even the word Sangam comes from a Sanskrit word Sangha that means gathering or congregation of people.

For all those advocates of Dravidian politics who tend to separate Sanskrit from Tamil as distinct language groups, it is pertinent to point out that both Sanskrit and Tamil had the same mother i.e. Brahmi language. Murugan is the most worshiped god in Tamil Nadu and he is regarded as the son of Shiva and nephew of Vishnu. Some of the most marvellous Hindu temples are in Tamil Nadu and all of them have been erected by the great Hindu rulers of the Chola, Chera, Pandya, Rashtrakutta and other dynasties.

Unfortunately, for the Dravidian parties, these temples have become money spinning machines. From time immemorial, the Bharatvarsha has been conceived of a geographical entity extending from the oceans to the Himalayas irrespective of enormous diversity and has witnessed the acceptance of common deities, common belief systems, common modes of worship and common gods and goddesses.

Hindu Dharma has been the socio-cultural fusion between different ethnicities across Bharat. The Alvars and the Nayanars who were Tamils played a key role in the perpetuation of the Bhakti tradition in the country.

However hard you try, you can’t kill the connection between the Sanatan Dharma and the land of Adi Shankara, Thiruvalluvar and the revolutionary poet Subramaniam Bharti. Dravida itself is a Sanskrit word that means a place where the great ocean waters meet. Dravida has never been about race and hence, it’s high time the Dravidian parties stop preaching the race theories that they have borrowed from the west.

Thiruvalluvar’s Thirukurral is traditionally praised as Universal Veda and touches issues that are at the core of Sanatan philosophy, culture and civilization. It is widely believed that Tolkkapiyam (Tamil grammar) was composed by the disciples of sage Agastya who crossed Vindhyas to enter south.

The popularity of Ramayana in that part of Bharat shows the emotional bonding between north and south. Bhagwan Rama fought with Ravana and for this, he had to traverse through south and places like Rameswaram still bear testimony to our cultural unity. Kamba Ramayan is a masterpiece.

Other Dharmic religions that originated in the north like Bauddha Dharma and Jain Dharma are mentioned with great veneration in Tamil literature.

Now, let us turn to kings and rulers of the south. Though military expeditions from north to south or vice versa were difficult due to inhospitable terrain, they occurred from time to time. Rajendra Chola defeated the Pallas of the Ganga region and brought the holy Ganga water to purify his capital Gangai Konda Cholapuram.

Cheran Senguttuvam of Sangam age defeated the Yavanas and is said to have expanded his kingdom even up to the Himalayas as mentioned in Purananooru. The famous Gupta ruler Samudragupta reached as far as Kanchipuram in his southern military expedition. The footprint of the Bharatiya cultural matrix is seen in places as far as Myanmar, Indonesia and Sri Lanka and only southern Bharat’s kings could have done that due to their superior navy.

So, Tamil Nadu and the northern part of the Bharatiya peninsula were no strangers to each other and were bound by a common unifying thread of Hindu Dharma.

I think Dravidian politicians are never going to succeed in their nefarious design of trying to alienate Tamil Nadu from the national mainstream. Tamil Nadu is as Hindu as the rest of the country and rather than allowing the existence of racial theory inspired insincere Dravidian political whims and fancies, the union Govt needs to intervene with the 3-language formula. The Hindi language needs to be promoted and not imposed.

Why do the Tamil politicians want to prevent Tamilians from learning Hindi which is the most popular and major link language of the nation? All the states should adopt 3-language formula on a level footing. The Hindi states like UP, Bihar and MP must ensure that apart from Hindi and English, the school children learn a regional language, preferably from the south like Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam etc.

The third language must not be made mandatory for school exams but be just of optional or qualifying nature. No one expects people from south becoming experts in Hindi and people from north having a profound knowledge in Tamil but at least, the working knowledge or the school level elementary knowledge in third language must there among people.

To know a language is to know its culture. Multilingual people are expected to know about and interact with more cultures making them more accommodative. Multi linguality can help check against regional/linguistic chauvinism. The 3-language formula is going to foster nationalism, promote brotherhood and integration and pave the way for individuals to go slow on their regional identity in favour of becoming national citizens.

The central government needs to act tough and not bow down to the pressure created by regional political parties of Tamil Nadu. The divisive Dravidian ideology needs to be defeated and the lost cultural civilizational glory of Tamil Nadu needs to be reclaimed. But before implementing the study of Hindi as the third language in Tamil Nadu, the state governments of the northern Hindi states must reciprocate and adopt Tamil or any other Dravidian language wholeheartedly in their curriculum.

Before talking about Hindi, let us not forget that there is more than half of the national population that is non-Hindi in tongue; in its love for Hindi the nation can’t afford to ride roughshod over other regional languages.

-by Shri Jai Prakash Ojha (The author works with IGNOU as Assistant Registrar.)

(Featured image source)


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

An Army veteran & research scholar replies to Imran Khan’s lies & warmongering in New York Times

0

Pakistan’s PM Imran Khan recently wrote an article in the New York Times: “The World Can’t Ignore Kashmir. We Are All in Danger.” The article is a mix of lies, distortions and a crude attempt at warmongering & blackmailing the entire world through the spectre of nuclear war.

Below, we provide a point by point rebuttal of the article, by Col. (Dr.) DPK Pillay, an Indian Army veteran and research scholar. (Extracts from the article are in italics, followed by Col.Pillay’s response)

After I was elected prime minister of Pakistan last August, one of my foremost priorities was to work for lasting and just peace in South Asia. India and Pakistan, despite our difficult history, confront similar challenges of poverty, unemployment and climate change, especially the threat of melting glaciers and scarcity of water for hundreds of millions of our citizens.

If this were so, Pakistan would not have been progressively reducing allocations for the water sector in its budgets, even under Imran Khan.

I wanted to normalize relations with India through trade and by settling the Kashmir dispute, the foremost impediment to the normalization of relations between us.

Pakistan even under Imran Khan did not move to give Bharat MFN status mandated under the WTO and neither did it allow land transit to Afghanistan. So much for wanting to normalize relations through trade.

On July 26, 2018, in my first televised address to Pakistan after winning the elections, I stated we wanted peace with India and if it took one step forward, we would take two steps. After that, a meeting between our two foreign ministers was arranged on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly session in September 2018, but India canceled the meeting. That September I also wrote my first of three letters to Prime Minister Narendra Modi calling for dialogue and peace.

Bharat has maintained a consistent position that terror and talks cannot go together. With Pakistan persisting with fomenting terrorism in Bharat, a dialogue is just not possible.

Unfortunately, all my efforts to start a dialogue for peace were rebuffed by India. Initially, we assumed that Mr. Modi’s increasingly hard-line positions and his rhetoric against Pakistan were aimed to whip up a nationalist frenzy among the Indian voters with an eye on the Indian elections in May.

Same as above.

On Feb. 14, a few months before those elections, a young Kashmiri man carried out a suicide attack against Indian troops in Indian occupied Kashmir. The Indian government promptly blamed Pakistan. We asked for evidence, but Mr. Modi sent Indian Air Force fighter planes across the border to Pakistan. Our Air Force brought down an Indian plane and captured the pilot. We struck back to signal we could defend ourselves but chose not to strike a target that would cause loss of life. I made a conscious decision to show that Pakistan had no intent of aggravating the conflict between two nuclear-armed states. We returned the captured Indian pilot, with no preconditions. 

Quite conveniently, Imran Khan has not mentioned that the suicide bomber belonged to the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) that is based in Pakistan, and the organization immediately claimed that it had carried out the attack.  As far as returning the captured pilot, Pakistan has not done any favour.  It has merely fulfilled its obligation under the Geneva Convention.

On May 23, after Mr. Modi’s re-election, I congratulated him and hoped we could work for “peace, progress and prosperity in South Asia.” In June, I sent another letter to Mr. Modi offering dialogue to work toward peace. Again, India chose not to respond. And we found out that while I was making peace overtures, India had been lobbying to get Pakistan placed on the “blacklist” at the intergovernmental Financial Action Task Force, which could lead to severe economic sanctions and push us toward bankruptcy. 

Bharat did not need to lobby to get Pakistan placed on the ‘blacklist’ of the FATF. It was placed on the ‘grey-list’ in 2018 due to serious deficiencies in its anti-money laundering and terrorism financing regimes. The recent visit of the Asia Pacific Group (APG) has identified a series of continuing shortcomings in Pakistan. Clearly Pakistan is not serious about complying with internationally accepted norms in these areas.

Evidently Mr. Modi had mistaken our desire for peace in a nuclear neighborhood as appeasement. We were not simply up against a hostile government. We were up against a “New India,” which is governed by leaders and a party that are the products of the Hindu supremacist mother ship, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, or the R.S.S.

The Indian prime minister and several ministers of his government continue to be members of the R.S.S., whose founding fathers expressed their admiration for Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. Mr. Modi has written with great love and reverence about M.S. Golwalkar, the second supreme leader of the R.S.S., and has referred to Mr. Golwakar as “Pujiniya Shri Guruji (Guru Worthy of Worship).”

Mr. Modi’s guru wrote admiringly about the Final Solution in “We, Our Nationhood Defined,” his 1939 book: “To keep up the purity of the race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic Races — the Jews. National pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well-nigh impossible it is for races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindustan for us to learn and profit by.”

For someone who is known by the moniker of ‘Taliban Khan’, it does seem strange to be pointing fingers at others.

I had hoped that being elected prime minister might lead Mr. Modi to cast aside his old ways as the chief minister of the Indian state of Gujarat, when he gained global notoriety for the 2002 pogrom against local Muslims on his watch and was denied a visa to travel to the United States under its International Religious Freedom Act — a list of visa denials that included associates of Slobodan Milosevic.

There have been several court-supervised enquiries into the events and none of them have found any responsibility of Shri Modi. Such lies and insinuations do not behoove the Prime Minister of a country.

Mr. Modi’s first term as prime minister had been marked by lynching of Muslims, Christians and Dalits by extremist Hindu mobs. In Indian-occupied Kashmir, we have witnessed increased state violence against defiant Kashmiris. Pellet-firing shotguns were introduced and aimed at the eyes of young Kashmiri protesters, blinding hundreds.

Imran Khan would be better off looking at the egregious violations of the human rights of the Baloch, the Pashtuns and the minorities in his own country. There are thousands of missing Baloch and the almost daily forced conversions of minority Hindu, Christian and Sikh girls.

On Aug. 5, in its most brazen and egregious move, Mr. Modi’s government altered the status of Indian-occupied Kashmir through the revocation of Article 370 and 35A of the Indian Constitution. The move is illegal under the Constitution of India, but more important, it is a violation of the United Nations Security Council resolutions on Kashmir and the Shimla Agreement between India and Pakistan. And Mr. Modi’s “New India” chose to do this by imposing a military curfew in Kashmir, imprisoning its population in their homes and cutting off their phone, internet and television connections, rendering them without news of the world or their loved ones. The siege was followed by a purge: Thousands of Kashmiris have been arrested and thrown into prisons across India. A blood bath is feared in Kashmir when the curfew is lifted. 

Already, Kashmiris coming out in defiance of the curfew are being shot and killed.

Whatever has been done on 05 August is as per the Bharatiya constitution. It has been ratified by both Houses of Bharat’s parliament. We hardly need lessons from the ‘selected’ prime minister of Pakistan on democracy or constitutional practices.

If the world does nothing to stop the Indian assault on Kashmir and its people, there will be consequences for the whole world as two nuclear-armed states get ever closer to a direct military confrontation. India’s defense minister has issued a not-so-veiled nuclear threat to Pakistan by saying that the future of India’s “no first use” policy on nuclear weapons will “depend on circumstances.” Similar statements have been made by Indian leaders periodically. Pakistan has long viewed India’s “no first use” claims with skepticism. 

The fact that Imran Khan considers internal matters of Bharat as a cause for direct military confrontation shows just who is war-mongering. Khan’s harangue about Bharat’s ‘no first use’ is really laughable, since Pakistan has refused to specifically say that it has a ‘no first use’ policy.

With the nuclear shadow hovering over South Asia, we realize that Pakistan and India have to move out of a zero-sum mind-set to begin dialogue on Kashmir, various strategic matters and trade. On Kashmir, the dialogue must include all stakeholders, especially the Kashmiris. We have already prepared multiple options that can be worked on while honoring the right to self-determination the Kashmiris were promised by the Security Council resolutions and India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru.

Through dialogue and negotiations, the stakeholders can arrive at a viable solution to end the decades of suffering of the Kashmiri people and move toward a stable and just peace in the region. But dialogue can start only when India reverses its illegal annexation of Kashmir, ends the curfew and lockdown, and withdraws its troops to the barracks.

What Bharat has done is irreversible. The earlier Pakistan gets used to it, the better it would be for itself and for the region.

It is imperative that the international community think beyond trade and business advantages. World War II happened because of appeasement at Munich. A similar threat looms over the world again, but this time under the nuclear shadow.

There is no threat of war from Bharat’s side. Perhaps the international community needs to advise Pakistan on the issue.

Hindupost Note

It seems to us that The New York Times has decided to be part of the propaganda machinery of Pakistan and ‘Taliban’ Khan. The article is so full of mischievous spin to events, that giving space to it is a clear indication that the publication has decided to throw journalistic professionalism out of the window.

Secondly, every accusation that ‘Taliban’ Khan has made against the Bharatiya government and the Bharatiya Prime Minister, has come straight out of the playbook of the Khan Market Gang, which has since 2014 made demonising Bharat’s Prime Minister its sole mission.


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

14th Annual Hindu Mandir Executives’ Conference in USA – Sustaining Temples and Institutions

0

The 14th annual Hindu Mandir Executives’ Conference (HMEC) is being led by the VHPA NJ chapter and it will be held from September 20 to 22, 2019 in East Hanover, New Jersey, USA. This year’s theme, “Sustaining Temples and Institutions: Building Security and Strength through Processes, Outreach and Seva,” will delve into the challenges facing Hindu temples and institutions as technology and social changes affect traditional beliefs and practices.

Around the globe we are seeing an increase in the number of disruptive and ignorant acts targeting religious institutions that threaten our safety within our places of worship. To protect ourselves and our Dharma, we must educate ourselves and the community while building awareness by connecting Hindus and non-Hindus alike through outreach and seva.

The 14th annual HMEC conference will give Hindu leaders the opportunity to understand how current events impact the safety of temples and institutions, and develop ways to strengthen temple management, religious programs, youth engagement, serving seniors and society.

HMEC was conceptualized by VHPA as a platform for Hindu temples and organizations to network, with the joint mission of strengthening and sustaining temples and building effective leadership, and facilitate new generation of Hindu leadership in North America.

To learn more about HMEC and to register for HMEC 2019, please visit http://www.hmec.info/Home/CurrentHMEC

Bhagvad Gita Scholarship for Middle and High School Students

Coalition of Hindu Youth (CHY) / Hindu Mandir Executives’ Conference (HMEC) announces ‘The Bhagvad Gita Sanatan Dharma Scholarship’ which aims to promote independent research, focusing on the rational foundation and the teachings of the Bhagvad Gita.

The Bhagvad Gita is a well-known Hindu spiritual text that is universally accepted not just for its sanctity, but also as a guide for day-to-day life i.e. “a handbook of life.” Messages from Bhagvad Gita such as: “Inaction in action and action in inaction,” are within the reach of common seeker of all ages.

Eligibility for the scholarship is extended to any student who is currently enrolled in the United States education system at the middle school and high school levels.

To get detailed information about the scholarship, click here or visit hinduscholarship.org


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.