This is the only western outfit which managed to not only mention but actually reported on “Sandeshkhali” incident, of so many Hindu women suffering sexual assault and molestation at the hands of TMC goons.
‘Good job!’ I’d say.
Except…
Yeah, okay, on the primary metric of our issue they did deign it important enough to mention it, reported on it once, but…
Given colonial anti-Hindu BBC’s history of repeatedly butting in Bharat with it’s rape/sexual assault statistics and incidents… and given the ‘so much concern’ they have for us, that Bharatiya government had to once ban its so-called ‘documentary’ of Nirbhaya rape case, (which happened under UPA rule by the way, when both Delhi and the nation was under congress control) and which meant BBC happily gave a platform to actual rapists of that monstrous incident, which meant the ban move was supported by even hardcore leftists, too… given all that, I find it perfectly reasonable to analyze BBC’s approach from a different lens.
Actually 2 different lenses.
1st is below:
Notice, by BBC’s own admission, since how long this was going on:
“Since January”.
Those are the first 2 words out of colonial BBC’s mouth when they do deign it important enough to report on it.
And then notice, by BBC’s own timestamp, when the report was published:
29 February 2024.
Seriously, they waited till even the “leap-year’s” last February date!
Because perhaps either they wished desperately for it to go away – like so many other things they ignore where poor helpless Hindus are victims of Abrahmo-Leftists – or if it didn’t, and they had to report but readers saw “March” on it, it’d have reflected too badly on them.
And specifically, why I’m focusing so much on this aspect?
The “timeline” (which started as early as 5th January 2024) between incident and reporting?
Because of this:
It was another January.
Another rape.
That was politicized to hell by anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat forces – even internationally – because it had happened around a temple. And more importantly, in the erst-while state of Jammu & Kashmir. A territorial issue that was internationalized by Islamist Pakistan on every occasion and blundered on by secular Nehru – both of them being a favorite of British and in general, the west.
I am, of course, talking about the Kathua child rape, for which entire urduwood stood up with placards saying, “I’m ashamed to be a Hindu!” – the same urduwood that’s ‘secular pro-max-ultra’ and loves Pakistan to death (perhaps literally), and which denied and invisibilized The Kashmir Files, a movie which barely scratched the surface (that too, after decades) of Kashmiri Hindu’s ethnic cleansing (it was another bloody January, BTW), which naturally included mass rapes of Hindu women by Jihadis backed by Pakistan. Where thinly-veiled (no pun intended) calls to rape them were blared from mosques’ loudspeakers.
Anyway, that (meaning Kathua rape) happened on 17th January 2018.
Look at BBC’s colonial, anti-Hindu disgust about ‘India.’
The entire story – and I do mean entire story – is about “delayed response” of “Indian public”, “Indian republic” and “Indian media” about something as heinous as “rape of a girl child.”
The subheading found in search-results, says this:
Because only British have a monopoly on moral imagination, I guess. Because it certainly takes a lot of imagination – morally, too – for them to ignore and suppress nearly 1,400 underage white girls’ mass rape at the hands of monstrous anti-white Pakistani Muslim men’s grooming gangs that went on for decades. The same pakistanis who export mass anti-Hindu hatred and terrorism in Kashmir.
And the reason for UK police and law-enforcement’s monstrous apathy and disdain for these thousands of underage, little, white girls?
Fear of being called racist and Islamophobic!
So, trust me, I really give credit to white British – then ruled by a woman Queen, no less! – for this really incredible capacity for “Moral Imagination,” to completely ignore rapes, sexual assault and child molestation of thousands of little, white, English girls at the hands of pakistani muslim men.
But anyway, coming back to Kathua case and BBC’s “reporting” on it in this particular manner.
And then… there’s (intended?) “effects” reporting, a few months later, like this:
That’s the continues, relentless ‘reporting’ of BBC over 2-day intervals I gathered (although there was also one from perhaps 13 April 2018).
And then… there’s (intended?) “effects” reporting, a few months later, like this:
And then an year later, a “follow up” too… like a good colonial, anti-Hindu western Abrahmo-Leftist taxpayer-funded propaganda outlet, checking-up on brown “hindoo savages” who were given a homework called ‘democracy’, which the “civilized white Brits” left behind; and BBC was checking whether the “brown Hindoo savages” are capable of it’s maintenance without their white-master being around:
Whoa…! All of a sudden, the victim became a “Muslim girl”, in the subheading itself! Or at least it became a damned necessary to mention that for colonial BBC, right there!
And so…you’ll find the same thing, the same pattern, if you searched in BBC for:
etc.
Pick any liberal’s favorite ‘category’ of women and their suffering, and you’d have BBC’s filthy hands all over it.
In fact, even generally speaking, about rape in Bharat, colonial anti-Hindu BBC is all over it!
So, the point?
- If we’re talking about numbers,
- And if we’re talking about urgency in reporting those numbers in the media.
- And if we’re also talking about, well, ‘keeping the talk going,’ across multiple reports, both near-term and far….
Then…
it’s utterly baffling to see BBC”s behavior in the case of “Sandeshkahli”.
- “Sandeshkhali” has hundreds and thousands of Hindu lower-caste women (if that identity is needed, according to liberals), on the streets! Not just anonymously on internet either. Protesting against TMC goons – led by a Muslim strongman (if that identity is unneeded, according to liberals) – against their molestation and rapes on an industrial scale, backed by the might of ‘Indian State’ under control of TMC, at least in that region.
- It – the BBC report I mean – comes 55 days after the 1st incident.
- And it is the only report in entire 55 days.
So yeah, anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat, BBC passed the test of at least mentioning the word “Sandeshkhali” – the lowest possible bar we set for foreign ‘liberal’ media, but it failed the task defined by its own standards.
…Unless it didn’t.
Unless that precisely was the standard.
And the task.
Namely…
Anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat propaganda.
According to which:
“Hindu lives DON’T matter.”
“Hindu women’s lives and dignity, matter even less.”
Perhaps that’s why we don’t see “Hindu” or “Muslim” in BBC’s report about “Sandeshkhali,” when against woke propaganda marauders, we deploy our super-weapon called Ctrl F and search for it.
Like it was in Kathua case’s subheading itself.
When a Bharatiya court’s trial began.
When BBC was pushing its foreign pressure propaganda, none too subtly either, cynically insinuating and threatening what a Bhartiya court must keep in mind, when it renders judgement. And more importantly, and much more opportunistically, pushing its hateful agenda for all other fanatical anti-Hindu, Abrahmo-Leftist world, a perfect radicalization material for Jihadis of all sorts, irregardless of judgement of a bharatiya court:
Pause and ponder what a Kashmiri Jihadi – or any other kind, doesn’t really matter – would think. The countless numbers who live in countless Islamist theocracies – under a religious doctrine where polytheists, idol-worshipers and pagans are considered the worst enemy for violent Jihad.
In a land which they already dream up of conquering and pillaging, according to a hateful Jihadi philosophy called Gazwa-E-Hind.
A land that’s already been partitioned once (overseen by the British) because of these Jihadi monsters – snatching away and occupying ancient Hindu territory where the very river from which the word ‘Hindu’ is taken from, once flowed and cackled: the river Sindhu and Saraswati on whose shores our civilization was shaped and reached a pinnacle of prosperity and glory, it lies brutally obliterated and extinct under an alien oppressive culture, devoid of all humanity, its ‘people’ deformed into a grotesque husk of blood-thirsty wraiths and golems ever hungry for Hindu blood.
A partition, which was the result of ‘Direct-Action’ against Hindus. Unrestrained Jihadi violence to occupy lands in the name of a religious entity that had no claim to those lands, ever. Under a pseudo-random – and more importantly: completely undemocratic excuse called “Muslim fear in Hindu majority Bharat.” (We’ll soon come to this particular nasty bit, just wait a few.)
Apart from which they also lay a completely illegal claim to the crown of our Bharat Mata: the Kashmir. And have been occupying half those lands as well, since 1947.
A region that is drenched in hateful, violent, anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat jihadi terrorism since decades – with the dubious honor of the only ethnic cleansing of a people in Bharat – that of Kashmiri Hindus – in independent ‘India’ under its belt. A dubious honor in extreme, I must say, no matter how you slice it.
And all of it over-seen by the crafty, anti-Hindu British.
And so…
Take all that context in, and then read what British Broadcasting Corporation focuses on – and equally importantly when and where, when they do this:
“Muslims fear for their future under Modi.”
The date was 16 May 2019, right when 2019 lok-sabha election was in full-swing.
But, more importantly…
Just 3 months after that utterly hateful anti-Hindu Pulwama suicide bombing on 14th February – which the enlightened west obsessed with “politics of love” celebrates as the “Festival of love!” – whose cowardly Islamist Kashmiri terrorist perpetrator had justified it using rabid anti-Hindu “Gau-Mutra jibes”. Killing 40 brave Bharatiya soldiers who were not even engaged in combat with Jihadi terrorists that day.
Just travelling in a bus.
Pulwama was an extremely dangerous situation that led to historical Balakot surgical strikes in PoK on 26 February 2019 and a dog-fight over Kashmiri skies on 27th February, which made a living legend of a Bharatiya MiG-21 fighter pilot downing an American F-16, with whom I share a name, too! (No relation with ace-pilot, though, promise!)
A situation which, if Trump Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is to be believed, could’ve led to a Nuclear War. (I don’t believe any foreigner blindly at this point, but it’s also true that there has NEVER been a situation where 2 nuclear-armed countries had their fighter/bombers crossing the borders; bombing each other’s territory; and having a dog-fight over a bitterly contested region where the occupier happened to be also, a Jihadi hate factory. So there’s that.)
And so, what do we get, when crafty, anti-Hindu British Broadcasting Corporation – owned by the British State that was entirely responsible for colluding with Seculars and Jihadis, in leading to this bloody continuing mess called partition, Jihad, and occupied ancient Hindu lands from where monstrous Jihadis keep crowing for more occupation – involves itself in the matter. What does BBC decide to write, in this highly volatile a situation, an article, right in the middle of Bharatiya elections, titled:
“Muslims fear for their future under Modi.”
All of the Muslims, their entire future, all across Bharat.
What do you get in it?
I’ll tell you.
A whole host of stuff dedicated singularly to Kathua rape. From Jammu and Kashmir.
I’ll repeat:
When that particular talk is about so-called “Muslim” fear in entire Bharat under Modi, BBC – funded by those who’re responsible for colonialism of our nation and eventual partition and snatching away of ancient Hindu lands by Muslim Jihadi terrorists-separatists – that BBC chose to focus, in that extremely volatile time, in that extremely volatile region called Kashmir, on Kathua rape – and they did it, massively, using quint-essential Hindu-Muslim hateful separatist rhetoric of partition.
And I’ll back it up, my claims about colonial BBC’s anti-Hindu, partitionist propaganda articles, with actual numbers, just stay tuned.
(To be continued…)
