spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
17.5 C
Sringeri
Saturday, February 15, 2025

“Ganapathi is an imaginary god, Buddha was a Dravidian shakti”, says retd ACP, BK Shivaram at “Dravidian Movement & Present Situation” memorial event for author Jayakumar

On July 17, 2024, a memorial event for the late senior Kannada journalist and social activist R. Jayakumar was held at Gandhi Bhavan Hall in Bangalore. Based on the reports from Sanje Vaani, the event, which included the unveiling of Jayakumar’s portrait, featured speeches from various dignitaries and thinkers aligned with Dravidian ideology, often criticized for its anti-Sanatana Dharma stance.

Prof. Tamil Selvan, who spoke about the objectives and achievements of the Dravidian movement, and senior journalist Dinesh Aminmattu, who addressed its current relevance in Karnataka, both reinforced the movement’s critical views of Hindu traditions. B.K. Shivaram, a retired police officer, made remarks that challenged core Hindu beliefs, aligning with his well-known anti-Hindu perspectives. Shivanand Tagaduru, President of the Karnataka Working Journalists’ Association, and S.R. Aradhya, another senior journalist, also contributed to the discussions, which were largely focused on promoting Dravidian ideology and critiquing Sanatana Dharma. The event was seen as a platform for advancing Dravidian perspectives while undermining and criticizing traditional Hindu values.

The programme, titled “Dravidian Movement & Present Situation,” featured a group of speakers who expressed strong viewpoints against traditional Hindu practices and Sanatana Dharma. Key themes of the speeches included:

  • The Dravidian movement’s foundational philosophy of “everything for everyone.”
  • The recognition of Tamil Nadu as a pioneering state in guiding Dravidian ideology.
  • The importance of reading the writings of Periyar and Anna to understand the movement’s principles.

Among the notable speakers was retired Assistant Commissioner of Police B.K. Shivaram, who made controversial remarks challenging traditional Hindu beliefs. He emphasized the Dravidian movement’s commitment to equality and criticized the deities in Hindu Dharma and how Hindus carried out their duties towards their deities.

Meanwhile, retired Assistant Commissioner of Police B.K. Shivaram made several controversial statements that have sparked considerable debate.

Shivaram asserted, “Kanakadasa, Ramanuja Acharya, and Kabir Das were all born here, but we live with a Dasa-like mental state, which will eventually bury us under the soil. In between being Dasa and an Acharya, we are the ones who respect gods and demi-gods. Everything stems from the Dashavatara concept, and now scientific reasons are being shown because we started questioning it, yet we still believe it has truth.”

He also recalled a statement by Sanhehalli Swami, who said, “Ganapathi is an imaginary god.” Shivaram added, “Even I believe that God Ganesha is not real; it is just imaginary. In our country, Buddha represents Dravidian Shakti. They know they can’t create a Buddha like they have done for other reincarnations.” These statements from Shivaram clearly reflect a lack of understanding or disregard for the deep-rooted beliefs and legacy of Sanatana Dharma. His assertions were seen as a direct hit against the core principles and knowledge of Hindu Dharma.

Shivaram pointed out that out of the ten incarnations, Dravidian activists fight for equality, with Buddha representing the Dravidian ideology. “Buddha stands for Dalits, sweepers, and daily wage workers. In this Kaliyuga, Buddha is represented by Babasaheb Ambedkar, embodying socialistic ideology and equality,” he stated. Through this statement, Shivaram tried to reframe ancient Hindu narratives by making contentious arguments, which some view as unnecessary and aimed at distorting historical truths to align with a particular ideological agenda.

He further claimed that some people have attempted to erase Buddha and replace him with Balarama, Krishna’s brother. Shivaram emphasized this point during his speech, highlighting the ongoing struggle for Dravidian representation and equality in society.

Satish Jarkiholi, the Minister of Public Works for Karnataka, expressed strong criticisms of traditional Hindu practices. He emphasized the need to move beyond superstitions and rituals. Jarkiholi criticized the continued veneration of religious figures, highlighting the example of a former police officer from Uttar Pradesh who has become a swami. He pointed out that, despite advancements in science and technology, large numbers of people still engage in practices such as touching the swami’s feet and applying the dust from his feet to their heads. This was described as a manifestation of outdated beliefs, even among educated individuals.

Jarkiholi further condemned the ritualistic practices prevalent in both North India and Karnataka, suggesting that they unfairly elevate certain individuals to positions of power and influence. He argued that such practices hinder genuine social progress and that leadership should be based on merit rather than ritualistic reverence. Such statements from Karnataka Minister Satish Jarkiholi, representing the Congress government, are indeed controversial and unappreciated. The Congress party’s divide-and-rule policies and some of its members’ ideologies often reflect a stance against Hindu Dharma. This approach is seen as an attempt to manipulate and undermine Hindu sentiments, creating divisions within the population.

The Dravidian ideology

The Dravidian ideology, which emerged as a social and political movement in South India, has often been accused of employing a divide-and-rule strategy by targeting Brahmins and Hindu Dharma. Advocates of this ideology argue for social equality and the upliftment of marginalized communities. However, critics contend that in their pursuit of these goals, Dravidian leaders have frequently vilified Brahmins, portraying them as oppressors and scapegoating them for social inequalities. This has led to a divisive narrative that pits different social groups against each other, fostering animosity and undermining the unity of Hindu society. By focusing on caste-based distinctions and promoting anti-Brahmin rhetoric, Dravidian ideology has been seen as fragmenting the Hindu community, rather than fostering true social harmony and inclusive progress. This hate speech not only undermines the unity and cohesion of Hindu society but also attempts to reshape its identity to fit a particular ideological framework through manipulative tactics.

Recently, anti-Sanatana Dravidian elements opposed the celebration of chess prodigy Praggnanandhaa, despite his recent loss in the final of the FIDE World Chess Championship. While Praggnanandhaa, an 18-year-old, was honored in Bharat for his achievements and for proudly displaying his culture and religion, some critics could not tolerate seeing a young Hindu wearing vibhuti achieve such success. This reaction from certain anti Hindu extremist groups reflects their ongoing resistance to acknowledging the accomplishments of individuals who openly embrace and represent Hindu traditions.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram &  YouTube. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Sign up to receive HinduPost content in your inbox
Select list(s):

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Thanks for Visiting Hindupost

Dear valued reader,
HinduPost.in has been your reliable source for news and perspectives vital to the Hindu community. We strive to amplify diverse voices and broaden understanding, but we can't do it alone. Keeping our platform free and high-quality requires resources. As a non-profit, we rely on reader contributions. Please consider donating to HinduPost.in. Any amount you give can make a real difference. It's simple - click on this button:
By supporting us, you invest in a platform dedicated to truth, understanding, and the voices of the Hindu community. Thank you for standing with us.