This mohammadan part of oath “There is no god but Allah, and none is worthy of worship except Him”, actually is meant to be “There is no god but Mohammadi Allah, and none is worthy of worship except Him”. Allah was worshipped in Arabia earlier too before Mohammad crafted his own version of Allah. This oath is an extremely arrogant, intolerant, malicious, and narcissistic in nature. And that is the fundamental reason why saying it in temple must be considered criminal. This is in contrast to saying Jay Shri Krishna or Jay Shri Ram or Namokar Mantra in mosque, which would signify goodwill, non-voilence, victory over evil, empathy and compassion. But in today’s criminal, terror ridden national and international ecosystem, lots of people will consider the later as intolerant, while at the same time they tend to classify the actual Mohammadan oath of intolerance as freedom of expression and they would say that the Mohammadan oath utterer was simply expressing his faith and Hindus are suppressing poor minority (Mohammadans).

Do you deny this? When a Mohammadan gangster steals or snatches a cattle belonging to a Hindu milkman (gwala), it basically causes financial and livelihood ruin of the poor Hindu gwala – the victim, but entire national and international media, politicians and other influencers start screeching about intolerant Hindus or Hindutva, none even mentions anything about the real victims.