spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
22.6 C
Sringeri
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Home Blog Page 914

Britain set to become global hotspot of Islamic finance

0
For representative purpose only

There is an extremely disturbing sign of the UK becoming a global hotspot of Islamic finance. According to media reports, the Minister of State in the Department for Business and Trade, Lord Johnson “will lead a series of roundtables with the world’s leading Islamic banks to map out a path for the UK achieving its goal of becoming a global hotspot of Islamic finance”.

Managing risk in these powerful foreign partnerships will become an issue as the economically crumbling UK looks for any avenue to build back its economy. For example, the funneling of billions of dollars from Islamic banks to al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and other jihad groups are well established. In fact, Islamic finance owes much of its foundation to unsavory jihadis, most notably Sayyid Abul Ala Maudaudi, a Pakistani Muslim scholar and Islamic jurist who was founder of the Jamaat-e-Islami in Pakistan, and Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Every business partnership involves both sides seeking its own interests, while negotiating an acceptable outcome for both parties. Is the UK in any position to effectively negotiate its interests in partnership with the world’s leading Islamic banks, particularly given its habit of kowtowing and subservience to Islamic groups?

The benefits of Sharia finance to Britain are being touted for its risk-sharing characteristics during turbulent economic times, and therefore the claim is that these partnerships will stabilize Britain’s economy in the long term. But there’s more than meets the eye to these partnerships. Dr. Zamir Iqbal, Vice President, Finance (Chief Financial Officer) of the Islamic Development Bank in Saudi Arabia, affirms the “integration of finance with Islamic morals and ethics,” which is another way of expressing the integration of the Sharia in every aspect of an observant Muslim’s life. The Sharia is regarded as a law above all others, is expansionary and supremacist, and rules every aspect of the Muslim life, from faith to finances.

The UK is discarding its Judeo-Christian identity and defying its own rule of law in permitting illegal, mostly Muslim migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East to enter the country at will. Given the rapid growth of its Muslim population, it’s no surprise that the United Kingdom is now seeking to become an Islamic (sharia) finance “global hotspot”, even after running its own economy into the ground. At the same time, Britain is allowing its Muslim population – particularly those Muslim immigrants in spreading Islam and Sharia culture within societies while Muslim mosques and so-called community centers have become breeding grounds of jihadist indoctrination.

According to media reports, many Muslims living in the UK who should be protected under British laws are not. They are still subject to the Sharia in a democracy. This is not just happening within Britain’s 85 plus Sharia courts, which should not be in existence, but sharia rulings from abroad are also having an impact too; as seen in the case of a 14-year-old girl who lost her inheritance after being ‘identified’ as a Christian.

Over 85 human rights abusing Sharia courts were set up under Former UK leader Theresa May’s watch; she hailed the ‘benefits’ of Sharia.  Now, those courts are operating beyond the reach of British law and are oppressing and abusing Muslim women.

Another report said, Britain is gradually slipping into the grips of radical Muslims and jihadists with a large portion of London in particular being already under the control of Muslims where Sharia rules are being enforced, media reports said, now Muslim jihadists are enforcing strict Sharia rule inside British prisons.

Counterterrorism specialist Sir Jonathan Hall said self-styled emirs (mostly affiliated to the Islamic State or Daesh) have enforced Sharia rule in Belmarch and Whitemoor prisons. He made the comments in his review of how terrorism is being dealt with inside prisons in the United Kingdom as well prisons in other European Union nations.

Meanwhile, according to another news source, activities of jihadist trojan horse Tablighi Jamaat has deeply penetrated inside various prisons in England where non-Muslims are becoming targets of radicalized Muslim prisoners and in some cases are even forced to convert into Islam. Tablighi Jamaat is also offering a monthly stipend to the families of newly converted Muslim prisoners.

It said, Friday prayers are held in most of the UK prisons, where fatwas are issued openly calling upon Muslim prisoners to wage jihad against Jews, Christians and “enemies of Allah”. It also reminds the Muslim prisoners of their “divine responsibilities” of enforcing Sharia inside and outside of the prisons adding that “Muslims have responsibility of bringing lands of infidels, Jews, Christians and non-Muslims under the flag of Islam and enforce Caliphate for the sake of enjoying unending luxury and comfort in the heaven in the life after”.

Conversion to Islam in prisons refers to the modern phenomenon seen in the Western world of a statistically high incidence of incarcerated criminal non-Muslims converting to Islam while in the prison system. In the decade preceding 2014, the number of conversions to Islam among prisoners in Western countries outpaced all other religions, with the overall imprisoned Muslim population (jailhouse converts to Islam plus inmates who entered the prison system as Muslims) growing as a result.

Similar incidents are also happening in France. While Germans are fleeing to Paraguay fearing persecution by the Muslim migrants, Muslim inmates in French prisons are enforcing sharia rule. But Emmanuel Macron’s government thinks these radical Muslim inmates will come out of prison and become “loyal, productive members of French secular society”.

According to French journal Actu, inmates in Prison of Perpignan were beaten by Muslims for failing to observe Ramadan. Actu journalist Emilien Vicens in her report said:

Particularly turbulent weekend at Perpignan prison, where several scuffles broke out. The Ufap Unsa Justice union continues to denounce record prison overcrowding.

Among the most overcrowded prisons in France, the Perpignan remand center has been recording an upsurge in violence and miscellaneous events for several months. This weekend, the tension has gone up a notch again, as a result of prison overcrowding that has become unsustainable, assures Pierre Grousset, local secretary of the Ufap Unsa Justice union.

Commenting on the alarming rise of Islamism in Britain, eminent journalist Joshua Winston in an article wrote:

The only patriarchy the UK has to worry about is the Islamic one. It feels repetitive to continue talking about it, since most of the Muslim rapists are still walking the streets still grooming, raping, and terrorizing their old victims together with new ones, but the institutional rape of non-Muslim girls didn’t resonate with today’s feminists. We can speculate as to why that might be – these women tend to be educated and middle-class, and therefore they will never experience the life of a neglected 12-year-old from a broken home who is being drugged, beaten, raped and trafficked by Muslim men in the very towns these feminists also live in, and next to the hipster venues they frequent. They’ll never know either quite what it’s like to be a Muslim teenage girl on the verge of womanhood, living in the UK and excited about all of the prospects and freedoms that lie before her, only to be restrained by the confines of religious and cultural practices that are not compatible with the UK’s. These women can’t quite put themselves in those girls’ shoes, although these women ask us to put ourselves in their shoes as they demand not to be shamed for being sex-workers, or for aborting multiple babies and then making gleeful TikTok videos about the killings.

Feminists in the UK claim not to be able to walk the streets at night for fear of being raped. Even the actress Kiera Knightley has come out to say that every woman has experienced harassment in the streets, claiming that the harassment comes in the form of being flashed, groped, or in the form of threats to slit a woman’s throat. She’s a multi-millionaire and she doesn’t live in Rotherham. The streets of her wealthy suburb must surely be going to the dogs if this is her “lived experience”.

There are countless women, most of them Muslim, who are trapped in arranged marriages in the UK today, in fear of their lives, with no chance of escape, living under threats of violence. Forget about not being able to walk the streets at night, which these women can’t do, at least not without a male chaperone. These women live in fear as they walk the floorboards of their bedrooms, living rooms, and kitchens in their own homes. Again, feminists are silent on the issue. Think of these women in marriages where rape isn’t a notion, where the woman has no right to say no to a man’s demands for sex. Forced into first-cousin marriages with no say in the matter, and this means nothing to UK feminists. The offspring from these marriages in which, through successive generations, first cousins have been breeding with each other and producing children with gene disorders, doesn’t tug on the heartstrings of feminists, either. Some of these offspring will be female. Do the lives of these girls not matter to feminists?

Fifty-five percent of Pakistani-heritage women in the UK are in forced, first-cousin marriages and are made to produce offspring that are all too often disabled, stillborn, or who will die in early infancy. The mutations these babies are born with will only get worse with each successive first cousin coupling. The gene-pool tightens with every sharia blessing. This marriage slavery should be of concern to British feminists. Why are they not outside the mosques and sharia courts like their German counterparts?

Is it fear that lies behind the silence? UK feminists are terrified of Muslim men. They are terrified of Islam.

According to Ken McCallum, the then Director-General of British spy agency MI5, Islamist jihadists remains as the biggest terror threat to the United Kingdom, while the mainstream media has chosen to hype his remarks on the comparatively minor threat from the far-right instead.

According to an Arab News report, The British Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Kemi Badenoch, and Minister of State in the Department for Business and Trade Lord Johnson  announced on Monday the launch of a new working group on Islamic Finance at a “Great British Iftar” at Lancaster House in London. The working group will help realize the Secretary of State’s priority of making the UK an undisputed investment destination by ensuring the UK is a global hub for Islamic finance, a statement said. 

Celebrity chef and founder of Spice Village, Suleman Raza, and award-winning music producer DJ Naughty Boy (Shahid Khan) curated a special “British Iftar Menu” for the evening, which served up a fusion of cuisines inspired by Morocco, Turkey, Lebanon, Pakistan and Malaysia.

This is how the UK is entering in a bigger way into the hole of Islamist trap. And most certainly this wave of Islamic finance or Sharia finance shall get further expanded into other Western nations, including the United States and Europe.

Delhi court directs authorities to “ensure Aftab Poonawala’s safety”

0

Counsel of Aaftab Amin Poonawala, who is accused of strangling his live-in partner Shraddha Walkar to death, chopping her body into several pieces, storing them in a fridge before disposing of them in a forest over three months, on Friday complained in court that his client was “manhandled” during his production in court.

As Additional Sessions Judge Manisha Khurana Kakkar heard the arguments on charges against the accused, she also directed the authorities concerned to ensure the safety of Poonawala.

“Lock-up in charge, Saket Court, as well as jail superintendent, are directed to ensure that the accused is produced safely during court productions,” she said.

The Delhi Police had earlier told the court that incriminating circumstances are clearly revealed through reliable and clinching evidence and they form a chain of events.

Poonawala has been booked for the offences under the Indian Penal Code Sections 302 and 201 for murder and causing disappearance of evidence of offence, respectively.

The accused’s counsel, on Friday, contended that Section 201 can be invoked only against the person who screens the offender and not against the person accused of the main offence.

Appearing for Police, Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad argued that he would place on record judgements against the argument.

During the hearing, victim’s father Vikas Walkar had prayed the court for supply of audio-video evidence attached with the charge sheet.

The SPP had opposed the request, saying that dissemination of such material to media would cause prejudice to the accused.

If it is supplied, then the condition of no dissemination to anyone should be imposed, he said.

The court has listed the matter for further proceedings on April 3.

SPP Prasad had earlier submitted that the accused is a trained chef from Taj Hotel and is aware of preserving flesh.

Poonawala had also ordered dry ice, agarbatti etc. after killing Shraddha Walker, the police had said.

It was added by the police that after committing the crime, he got into a new relationship and gave a ring to his new girlfriend.

On February 21, a city court had sent the case to the sessions court for initiation of trial proceedings.

Metropolitan magistrate Aviral Shukla had said: “Scrutiny of documents is complete… Section 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Code is exclusively triable by sessions court.”

The court had on February 7 taken cognisance of the charge sheet filed by the Delhi Police against Poonawala which ran over 6,000 pages.

(The story has been published via a syndicated feed with a modified headline.)

CBI officer probing post-poll violence in Bengal changed again, fourth in two years

0
Pic Source - IANS

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has once again replaced the investigating officer probing the post-poll violence case in West Bengal in connection with the murder of a BJP worker, Abhijit Sarkar, in Kolkata soon after the results of the 2021 Assembly polls were announced.

Sources said that the new investigation officer appointed in this case is Mithun Biswas, who has already taken charge of the probe and started interacting with the family members of the victim.

This is the fourth time that the central probe agency has changed its investigation officer in this particular case since it launched its probe in 2021. Initially, Ajay Kumar was the investigating officer, who after some time was replaced by S. Gyani. On March 1, Gyani was replaced by Bivek Ranjan Roy. Before the latter could complete a month since taking charge, Roy has been replaced now.

The CBI had earlier replaced its counsel in the case. Although questions are being raised after so many frequent replacements, CBI officials have remained tight-lipped in the matter.

The family members of the victims of post-poll violence have time and again complained about the slow pace of investigation by the CBI in the matter.

(The story has been published via a syndicated feed.)

After Sasaram, violence in Nalanda as well over Ram Navami Yatra

0

After Sasaram, massive violence erupted in Bihar’s Nalanda district on Friday in wake of the Ram Navami Shobha Yatra, leading to loss of both public and private property.

A minor child also sustained gunshot injuries. Four other persons also sustained injuries. They were admitted in Sadar hospital and they are said to be out of danger.

The violence was triggered during the Ram Navami Shobha Yatra started from Labour Welfare Centre on Friday evening. When it reached Kanta area, some persons pelted stones from the rooftops of the buildings, and this led to stampede-like situation and then, clashes.

Stones were pelted from both sides and led to protesters going on a rampage and vandalising or setting afire many vehicles, including a police jeep, as well as some shops, while police at the spot were unable to stop them due to inadequate numbers. Some police personnel also bore the brunt of the violence, which swept the Gagandiwan, Bhawarpur, Murarpur and Kanta localities of Nalanda city.

Keeping in view the massive violence, the district administration has deployed a large police contingent in the affected area. District administration has also imposed Section 144 in the entire Nalanda city to restore normalcy, as well as cutting the electricity and internet services as well.

The district police, however, claimed that the situation is now under control.

Earlier in Sasaram, violent clashes arose between two groups as well over the same reason.

The violence came ahead of Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s proposed rallies in Bihar – one in Sasaram and another in Nawada which is adjoining Nalanda district.

(The story has been published via a syndicated feed.)

Ilhan Omar spreads propaganda about “genocide of 200 million Muslims in India”

0
Ilhan Omar

Democratic Party’s congresswoman Ilhan Omar is known for her notoriously anti-Bharat mindset. On June 22, 2022 she introduced an anti-Bharat bill at the US Congress to condemn human rights violations and violations of international religious freedom in Bharat, including those targeting Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Dalits, Adivasis, and other religious and cultural minorities.

The resolution called on the Secretary of State to designate Bharat as a Country of Particular Concern under the International Religious Freedom Act, which has been recommended by the independent, bipartisan US Commission on International Religious Freedom for the past three years.

Radical Islamic groups felt delighted at such initiatives of their darling Ilhan Omar. Propaganda websites began circulating this with the agenda of spreading anti-Bharat sentiment throughout the world. Section of Bharatiya Muslims also took this advantage and attempted to portray Bharat as a Muslim persecuting nation. Arab media went further by making false claims stating Bharat was becoming another Rwanda.

It said, “there are now genuine concerns that India is following a similar trajectory to Rwanda in the early 1990s, when a singular event – the shooting down of an airplane carrying Hutu President Juvenal Habyarimana – sparked a genocide against ethnic Tutsis. The minority community had been subjected to years of racist propaganda, specifically tropes that characterized them as anti-national foreign invaders”.

In February this year, Ilhan Omar was booted from the Foreign Affairs Panel of the US Congress, a move that was quickly condemned by Joe Biden’s White House.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters, “The way that we see this, it’s a political stunt, much like House Republicans’ unjust removal of other leading Democrats from key committees in recent weeks. It is a disservice to the American people.

“What we believe is Congresswoman Omar is a highly respected member of the Congress. She has apologized for her comments she made in the past. I think she – most recently – did an extensive interview about this on Sunday, I believe on CNN, and has been vocal about condemning antisemitism as well as affirming our strong alliance and important partnership with Israel”.

Karine Jean-Pierre was grossly wrong or she was lying. Ilhan Omar never apologized for her false comments she had made against Bharat and for her suspicious visit to Pakistan and outrageous comments about Jammu & Kashmir.

Commenting about the ouster of Ilhan Omar from the committee, House Speaker Kevin McCathy said: “We just do not believe when it comes to foreign affairs, especially the responsibility of that position around the world with the comments that you make. She (Illhan Omar) shouldn’t serve there.

“Moving forward, every single member of the Congress has a responsibility to know how they carry themselves”.

It seems, even being booted out from the Foreign Affairs Panel of the US Congress, Ilhan Omar did not correct herself or learn any lesson. Instead, she has once again made an outrageous statement against Bharat stating 200 million Muslims in Bharat are facing risk of possible genocide, despite the fact that there has been a genocide in Bharat that claimed as many as 80 million lives, but the victims were Hindus and the perpetrators Muslims.

A large number of anti-militancy newspapers in the world are regularly publishing reports about Muslim violence against Hindus in Bharat, and threat of more. Ilhan Omar of course, knows exactly what she is doing; she is trying to stir up hysteria against Hindus so as to stymie the Bharatiya Prime Minister Narendra Modi government’s anti-jihad efforts, such as they are, and to lead to international pressure upon Bharat to grant special accommodations to Muslims on the basis of their victimhood status. It’s the same strategy the world over.

Gehlot govt proved weak in punishing Jaipur blasts accused: CP Joshi

0
Image source - IANS
Image source - IANS

Rajasthan BJP President C.P. Joshi claimed on Thursday that weak lobbying was done by the state government in the Jaipur serial bomb blasts case.

Joshi’s remark came after the Rajasthan High Court on Wednesday acquitted all the four men who were sentenced to death in 2019 for the 2008 serial bomb blasts in Jaipur that killed 71 people and injured 185 others.

The court also upheld the acquittal of a fifth accused besides accepting the plea of one of the accused stating that he was a minor.

“The entire case puts the government under suspicion for gross negligence. The acquittals show the insensitivity of the government in this whole matter. Seventy-one innocent lives were lost in the bomb blasts while hundreds of people were left. The government should punish the accused by strong lobbying in the Supreme Court and justice should be done to the victims.

“Going by the activities of the state government in the last four years, it is clear that it is doing appeasement politics on religious grounds, be it the case of Kanhaiya Lal’s murder in Udaipur or the Karauli riots.

“Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot also holds the home portfolio, yet the common man of Rajasthan is yearning for justice. If the state government does not show seriousness even in punishing the accused in heinous crimes like the Jaipur blasts, what will happen to the rest of the cases?”

(This article has been published via a syndicated feed)

The legacy of colonialism: Deconstructing the modernist narrative

0
Britannia carrying a large white flag labeled “Civilization” with British soldiers and colonists behind her, advancing on a horde of natives, one carrying a flag labeled “Barbarism”.

Having revied the same for my university assignments, in this article I analyze two characteristics of postcolonial scholarship, namely a critique of the modernist narrative and the production of the ‘other’, based on my reading of Ratna Kapur’s New Cosmologies: Mapping the Postcolonial Feminist Legal Project’, and the film Amistad.

To discuss the characteristics of postcolonialism, I must first define it in simple terms as a critical study of colonialism and its impressions still left behind. It describes how the devices and procedures utilised by previous empires still affect our current climate.

Critique of the modernist narrative

The modernist narrative of history per the author is a narrative through which the Eurocentric account of history is actualized and validated. Per the modernists, the new world was a creation of humans collectively moving from their dark past and towards their common goal of the new world post their enlightenment. This new world was often thought of as a liberal democracy with the established rule of law, a nation-state and individual sovereignty to mark their enlightened move from their ‘uncivilized’ personalities to their modern and ‘civilized’ selves.

However, wouldn’t we be in a utopia if after suffering through the atrocities of colonialism we had borne the fruit of colonial ‘enlightenment’? The lies fed to the colonies masked under the sweet-scented flowers of the new world were the biased structure of law, the nation-state eternally compelled by the post-colonial influences and a promise of individual sovereignty with no mechanisms to enforce it. The law that was meant to be an impartial decider of truth and boost humankind towards the future ended up being the structure reinforcing and excusing the same colonial atrocities it was built to protect against.

As was also argued by Dipesh Chakrabarty, the western study of history is entirely ‘modernist’ in the sense that it excuses its colonialism as acts committed to propelling humankind towards enlightenment and a greater future. with justice and modernity meaning being European. This modernist view that served only the imperialists is also reflected in the movie Amistad where in a court of law, in the post-colonial United States of America, there were proceedings to decide the fate of free men abducted by colonial forces, not as men but as chattel.

Even when found to be free, it was the systemic subjugation by the president of the USA that surpassed the legal system by dismissing the jury system and changing the judge amidst the hearings in fear of the court’s ruling in favour of the ‘others’, in our case east African Mendese. This hypocrisy of law is also rationalized by the author who reasons that the use of law to exclude the oppressed others is a result of the manipulation of law and a result of the post-colonial reverberations.

As was in the example of Mendese, the law was used as a structure of sustaining the unequal power structures and the mere emergence of the rule of law in the post-colonial society of the US did not mean justice or individual sovereignty for the ‘othered’, as is also foreseen by postcolonial scholarship.

The hangover of such colonial pasts is seen in nearly all postcolonial societies, for as Albert Memmi identified, it takes a long-time post ‘freedom’ before a free man truly emerges, as can also be seen in Bharat with wannabe wokes copying every move of the political left in the west, for their behaviours to these Bharatiyas is the epitome of civility, culture and truly in every meaning of the word enlightened. In their quest of exposing everyone’s biases, they are yet to wake up from their colonial hangover.

Production of the ‘other’’

The other important characteristic of post-colonial scholarship is the production of the ‘other’, such that it was comprehensible to the west. The imposition of such labels not merely through the use of armies, but through textual knowledge, such that the colonial power was able to give material effect to the imperial enterprise. Such was also the presenting of ‘documents’ in the movie Amistad with the Spanish ‘names’ of the slaves and the purchase deed from a plantation in Havana as some form of proof of rightful ownership of the humans deemed to be chattel, documents created willy nilly and merely because it is in writing it is legitimate? So much so as to strip one of their liberties?

Post-colonial theories discuss the exclusion of the ‘others’ from the principles of liberalism and how these were rationalized. Despite the belief that concepts such as liberty, equality and freedom were universally applicable, they were challenged when confronted with people who were different.

These diverse individuals were categorized as ‘others’ and were subjected to disparate treatment because they were assimilated into knowledge and representation systems that justified their distinctiveness, such as by John Locke and James Mill. Through the articulation of Locke’s liberal ideas traced back to the 17th Century, the normative claims of liberalism arose from the argument that everyone is equal, free, and rational.

However, this would be used in the 19th Century to relate the ‘other’ to children who couldn’t reason and therefore cannot consent to commonalities as the basis of his exclusionary policies, Mill went the opposite route by basing his exclusionary policies on the difference of cultures being too drastic for liberalism to work for the others.

The marginalization of the Mendese in every scene of the movie by the Westerners, be it the Portuguese illegally engaging in the slave trade, keeping them in conditions worse than those endured by cattle; be it the Spanish queen who as a child cares not for what slavery and the bold claims she makes about the people she governs even entail; or the justice system of the new world in the USA, wherein despite being free men, being recognized as such by the courts too, the systemic colonization of the minds of people in power such as the president hoping for his re-election, and senators from the south are willing to subjugate their liberties for nothing else but their ambitions and capitalistic gains. Mehta’s analysis shows how the universalist claims of liberalism and the notion of a rational subject were used to justify political exclusions and set the terms for them.

Conclusion

Under colonial rule, the subject was viewed as different, primitive, and an Other, and therefore denied the benefits of liberalism until they were “trained” into civilization. This view was consistent with the principles of liberalism and continues to operate today, justifying exclusions of various groups based on race, culture, and civilization.

In Bharat’s context, religion, and caste too, take for example the scheduled castes and tribes, who during the colonial period were thrust further into the rigid bands of occupations that they were permitted to engage in, with little access to formal education which was furthered post-independence with restrictions to entry to educational institutions such as the means to attend such privileged areas, be it money, transportation, clothing, etc.

While this rigidity has been loosened by the way of reservation in educational institutions, job opportunities, subsidies, and welfare schemes, those in the remotest of villages have little knowledge of how to access them and those in the urban settings often end up exploiting them. While this is a conversation for another article, it can be settled that both exclusion and inclusion are based on assumptions of such self-identified criteria, and the terms of inclusion demand the erasure of difference.

Another renowned Hindu doctor, ophthalmologist Dr. Birbal Genani gunned down: Karachi, Pakistan

1
Dr Birble
Ex KMC senior director health Dr Birbal Genani. (Twitter)

Pakistani Hindu Dr. Birbal Genani, a former senior director of health at the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and an eye specialist, was shot and killed by unknown assailants while returning home from his clinic near Layari in Karachi, Sindh.

Dr. Genani and his female assistant Dr. Quratul Ain were traveling to Gulshan-e-Iqbal when their car was targeted near the garden interchange on the Lyari Expressway.

Dr. Birbal Genani died on the spot, while his assistant sustained bullet injuries. The police have launched an investigation into the murder, which the SSP City Arif Aziz has called a “target killing.” The assailants managed to easily flee from the scene after carrying out of the attack.

The reason behind the murder is currently unknown, and authorities are recording the assistant’s statement.

(News report video archived here)

Sindh Governor Kamran Khan Tessori and Provincial Minority Affairs Minister Gian Chand Esrani have ‘taken note’ of the incident and requested a report regarding it from the additional inspector general of Karachi police.

Dr. Birbal and his daughter Dr. Sapna Kumari also did their MBA together two year ago.

On the same day, thousands of Pakistani Hindus held a massive protest demonstration outside Sindh’s provincial assembly against forced conversion, abductions of minor Hindu girls & other forms of persecution of Hindus and other minorities.

There is a long history of Hindu doctors and other accomplished professionals being targeted in Pakistan, a Muslim-majority nation which demonizes minorities in an institutionalized manner starting from school textbooks.

A few weeks back, Hindu dermatologist Dr. Dharamdev Rathee was murdered in Sindh by his Muslim driver on the eve of the Holi festival. Prior to that, one Dr. Daulat Ram was brutally assaulted in Thatta district of Sindh. In January, Dr. Harchand and his brother were attacked in Mirpur Khas. In June last year, Dr. Chetan Kumar was attacked and his clinic vandalized. In 2020, Dr. Lal Chand Bagari of Tando Allahyar, Sindh was murdered by slitting his throat. In 2019, veterinarian doctor Ramesh Kumar was targeted by Islamists in Mirpur Khas over a trumped up blasphemy charge. In 2016, Dr. Pritam Das Lakhwani was murdered while seeing patients in his clinic named ‘BISMILLAH CLINIC’ located in Karachi, Sindh. In 2011, 3 Pakistani Hindu doctors – Ashok Kumar, Naresh Kumar and Ajeet Kumar – were gunned down in Chak town, Sindh province on Eid-ul-Adha because one of them had demanded a fee for treating an influential local Muslim.

Recently, Hindu shopkeepers were also assaulted in Sindh for “allegedly violating the Ramzan ordinance,” – in one case, a dhaba owner was humiliated and his religion mocked by a police officer.

In news just in, Sikh businessman Dayal Singh was shot dead on Friday at 3 pm by armed men on a motorcycle in Peshawar’s Dir Colony area. About 15,000 Sikhs are said to still live in Peshawar, mostly in the Jogan Shah neighbourhood, although thousands have fled fearing for their lives. In September last year, a well-known Sikh ‘hakeem’ (Unani medicine practitioner) was shot dead by unidentified gunmen inside his clinic in Peshawar. In 2018, Charanjit Singh, a prominent Sikh community member, was killed by unknown men in Peshawar. Similarly, news channel anchor Ravinder Singh was killed in 2020 in the city. In 2016, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf National Assembly member Soren Singh was also killed in Peshawar.

Yet, despite this brutal persecution of Sikhs in Pakistan, the vocal Khalistani supporters among the Sikh diaspora overseas never utter one word against the Pakistani state, because their entire movement is conceptualized and promoted by the Pakistan Army-ISI.

The protocol for defecation and ablution: ‘Understanding the Hadith’ by Ram Swarup

0
Image used for representational purpose only. Image source - IANS
Image used for representational purpose only. Image source - IANS

“Now Muhammad takes us to the toilet. He forbids his followers “to face the qibla [i.e., toward the mosque at Mecca] at the time of excretion or urination, or cleansing with right hand or with less than three pebbles” (504).

Cleansing after excretion must be done an “odd number of times” (460), and one must not use “dung or bone” (505) for this purpose. There is a story explaining why the use of bones and dung is forbidden.

Muhammad once spent a night with jinns (genii) reciting the Quran to them. When they asked him about their provision of food, he told them: “Every bone on which the name of Allah is recited is your provision.

The time it will fall in your hand it would be covered with flesh, and the dung of the camels is fodder for your animals.” He therefore told his followers: “Don’t perform istinja with these things for these are the food of your brothers” (903).

He also tells his followers: “When anyone amongst you enters the privy, he must not touch the penis with his right hand” (512). ’Aisha tells us that the “Messenger of Allah loved to start from the right hand side in his every act, i.e., in wearing shoes, in combing, and in performing ablution”.

Ref: Understanding the Hadith. Pg 34

(This article has been compiled from the tweet thread posted by @RamSwarup_Voi on March 30, 2023)

Curriculum guidelines to be released under NEP, Centre will roll out new textbooks in 22 Bharatiya languages

0
curriculum

The National Curriculum Framework (NCF), a set of curricular guidelines that form an important part of National Education Policy (NEP), for all levels would be released in the coming months. The Education Ministry also announced that updated textbooks would be introduced for the academic year 2024-2025.

At present, NCF for the foundational level covering preschool to Class 2 has been released by the Education Ministry. The updated textbooks will be printed in twenty-two languages. The CBSE has already adopted the updated curriculum guidelines for the 2023-2024 academic year and will release textbooks for classes 1 and 2 at the end of the month.

Former ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation) chief K Kasturirangan is the head of the expert committee involved in the development of NCF. It must be pointed out that Kasturirangan also helped in the shaping of the NEP.

The process is being overseen by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) with inputs from 25 national focus groups. After the new textbooks are released the government will align the syllabus with its assessment platform PARAKH (Performance Assessment, Review and Analysis of Knowledge for Holistic Development).

NCERT books will be made available in twenty-two Bharatiya languages included in the Constitutions VIII schedule as asked by the Education Minister. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan chaired a high-level meeting on the new National Curriculum Framework and new textbooks based on NEP 2020 in New Delhi. Senior officials from NCERT, the Secretary of School Education, and members of the National Steering Committee on National Curriculum Framework attended the meeting.

“Pradhan also announced that the NCERT’s learning-teaching material, Jaadui Pitara, will be distributed as open educational resources to every school. He highlighted the need to transform this initiative into a mass movement, encouraging creative and innovative youth to develop various learning-teaching materials”, SwarajyaMag reported.

The Union HRD Ministry decided to revise the school curriculum and initiated a new National Curriculum Framework (NCF) for school education in June 2020. It is pertinent to mention that this revision of the curriculum is taking place after a decade and a half. This is the fifth revision of the NCF with previous revisions having been done in 1975, 1988, 2000 and 2005. NCERT has been directed to ensure that the cognitive load of textbooks be reduced, and additional areas like creative thinking, life skills, Bharatiya ethos, and art be integrated with the core content.

Several experts evaluated the transformation brought in by this revolutionary document (NEP) and the road ahead. “One of the major reforms of the policy is increased international collaboration between institutes. This gives students the flexibility to plan their education in a way that gives them global exposure and more options than ever. NEP focuses on enhancing students’ overall learning experiences and making education more skill-based and international, which would eventually lead to an upskilled workforce”, said Kunal Vasudeva, Co-founder and COO of the Indian School of Hospitality.

“National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, is a progressive education policy that has the potential to impact a large population in a country like India”, said Shishir Jaipuria, Chairman of FICCI Arise & Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions.

“The transformational education policy NEP 2020 has kept the educator and the learner right at the centre. The policy lays emphasis on teachers providing quality education to learners by diverting their attention from non-teaching tasks”, said Amit Kapoor, Co-Founder of Eupheus Learning.

NCERT and other school textbooks, especially those on history and social science, used by central and state education boards have long been criticised for presenting a distorted and colonised view of Bharatiya civilisation to meet certain political objectives. The revamped curriculum and textbooks are expected to rectify the errors.