This, I swear in the name of Bhagwan Shri Ram:
I’ve been intending to write about this since last 2 months. Hungrily awaiting the season’s latest crop of western propaganda.
Chiefly, it begins with USCIRF’s ‘Press-Release’ about “Religious Freedom” in the world for Bharat. In it, the usual anti-Hindu bigots wanted US State Department to put Bharat in a list of “Countries of Particular Concern.”
But fear not my friends! We find ourselves among excellent company of China, Pakistan, Saudi-Arabia, Syria, North-Korea, Iran, Vietnam etc. Another amusing fact of coincidence is that, it’s hard to see so many countries who’re at each other’s throats for a variety of reasons, finding themselves with common ground. Being part of the same list by high-flying morally righteous and religiously ‘neutral’ west.
I can almost see these people in the ‘list’ looking at each other in utter confusion and awkwardness in a moment of poignant pause.
I mean… I don’t know whether USCIRF is trying to embarrass us or themselves. Especially after being thoroughly exposed by DisinfoLab of Bharat for the Abrahnmo-Leftist stooges they were. It can’t just be a coincidence that a few days before this ‘joke’…erm, ahem, ‘report’ comes out, woke toilet-paper WaPo comes up with a hit-job at DisinfoLab itself, which – apart from being exposed earlier than was intended (that too, in just 1 or 2 sentences by Jack Posobiec!) — was an equally good (or bad) joke itself! It was so full of ‘anonymous sources’ it’d put The Perpetual Liar’s shoddy hit-job against Mr. Malviya and Meta to shame. Apart from the main-gist if the joke that WaPo couldn’t prove a single – yes, that’s right, not a single one – analysis of DisinfoLab as a lie or misinformation. It was basically a rant-meets-trust-me-vro! garbage that its editors forgot to throw in the dustbin where it belonged. No wonder its own ‘reporters’ (if they can be called that) were protesting against its top-management for wage-hikes.
It’s elementary.
You want quality journalism, you pay good money to real reporters.
Other-wise you get stuck with long, boring and unfunny jokes like the one WaPo did with DisinfoLab.
But anyway.
Don’t you love it when you can predict the future?
Especially at a moment of epic choices.
In fiction, its usually linked to a prophecy.
‘There will come a moment, when the noble hero/heroine would have to choose between the easy path, and the right one!’
All other characters might’ve an opinion about what’ll happen at that point.
Usually, interesting fiction makes for hero/heroine going weak at the knee, and making the evil choice – sometimes there’s not even an element of coercion. They willingly choose to tread that path of darkness.
Whatever be the case, it’s something the other, cynical, realist characters had long warned the hopeless idealists about.
Same is the case with USCIRF – and other assorted western ‘heroes/heroines.’ Of course even that’s a debatable thing for the forces of righteous west, because how dare a Hindutva fascist bigot like me assumed, quite casually, that it’s just about a ‘hero’ or ‘heroine’? What about 172 other gender/identities?
But yeah, that’s where we are.
Because it’s fiction. The whole USCIRF nautanki, and not even a good one either.
Thing is…
Abrahmo-Leftists – especially those of the west, they’re so, so full of themselves; the sense of entitlement, superiority complex, absolute monopolist claim of moral righteousness is so shamelessly high among this group that they see nothing inherently wrong, in judging others!
Especially so when it’s not 1 or 2 people they’re judging, but entire countries!
Doubly especially when they’d played a large part in thousands of years’ long oppression, slavery, exploitation, genocide and massacre in these same countries themselves.
Worse still, when its about stuff like judging all -things-religion and morality itself, in other countries: (remind me what did Jesus say about that? Something about ‘Let the man who has never sinned, cast the 1st stone.’ (which nobody had, everyone was guilty of sin)’ … or something like that.)
That one is one of the biggest questions, when it comes to morality. Of having even a rudimentary moral authority in judging others.
The concept goes beyond religious beliefs. It extends from personal character all the way up to all kinds of government regulatory frameworks.
Famously, in espionage (and especially right now, given the khalistani terrorists given refuge in western countries and all sorts of alleged covert assassination plots held against Bharat for which even USCIRF decided to offer its unwanted opinion), this one is called : “Who watches the watchers?”
Because if the judge itself is corrupt; if the highest levels of authority itself is rotten; if spies themselves are traitors, then what hope is there for others?
And so, if everyone is guilty, then morally right thing to do, is being fair to everyone’s guilt. Especially your own.
And no, the usual western bullcr*p about ‘both our democracies are not perfect, and that’s why we hold frank and free discussions with each other, because as democracies we can have robust engagement with our counterparts, to hold each other accountable and to make sure our commitment to our shared universal values remains strong, for Rules-Based-International-Order’… that nonsense simply won’t do. Because its proven nothing but a cover for shameless western bullying.
But ‘shameless’… ah, that’s the undeclared DNA of west-built ‘Rules-based-International-Order’, no?
‘Rules for thee, but not for me.’
USCIRF is the latest nail in that particular coffin – but we’ll not restrict ourselves to that.
Because when it comes to ensuring morally justifiable freedom, religious one is but a part of society.
In the USCIRF’s case… well nothing screams the biggest concern for religious freedom than what they call ‘world’s oldest hatred’ : anti-Semitism. Hatred against jews, rising its ugly head anywhere.
And that heinous Hamas terrorist attack on Jewish homeland on Oct 7 this year, that killed 1200 Israeli people (along with people from other nations) – a horrible act which included rapes of women, burning and/or beheadings of little babies, cold-blooded murder of elderly people and unrepentant display (even live-streaming!) of their genocidal, hate-filled Islamist intentions of murdering all Jews, what did that event inspire? In the bastion of religious-freedom called west?
Not the universal condemnation! No!
ADL – itself a hyper-woke organization – reports unprecedented, 337% increase in anti-Semitic incidents in the US! 2031, compared to ‘just’ 465 for the same period last year. (Oct 7 – Dec 7).
Their elite, taxpayer funded university campuses are so full of anti-Semitic rot that a host of 30+ student organizations signed a letter, blaming Israel – and not the disgusting, genocidal Hamas – for Jews’ own murder and slaughter! American congress hauled leaders of the 3 of them – Harvard, Upenn and MIT, to explain what the hell is going on in their campuses, and, when rep. Elise Stefanik asked them a simple, to-the-point, precise question: “Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard’s rules on bullying and harassment?” , they all gave dilly-dallying, shamelessly evasive answers, “depending on context.” Some of them even smirked!
Jewish students were locked inside a Cooper Union library and had to be evacuated by a backdoor with police assistance, while aggressive pro-Palestine ‘protester students’ shouted at them from outside a glass wall.
Across the pond, in UK, London police say anti-Semitic hate-crime number has risen to a staggering 1353%!
In Australia, this is only slightly sober at 738%. Heck, in front of Sydney opera house, heinous Islamists were heard shouting what would’ve been unthinkable in the ‘civilized west’ : “Gas the Jews!” A horrific reminder of holocaust when Hitler put jews in gas chambers en-masse and massacred them.
In Canada, while there’s no nationwide accurate percentage reports of rising anti Semitism that I could find, it is (among rise in other hate crimes), nevertheless, termed ‘staggering’ by Vancouver police. In Canada also, there were shootings at jews and synagogues firebombed.
The threats have been growing seriously in New Zealand too, where its termed being ‘rampant’ in schools. In a survey, its been reported that 50% parents of Jewish kids admitted their children being victim of anti-Semitism. Worse, even among them, only 40% thought anything worthwhile would come off if they reported it to authorities.
In France, the staunchest bastion of freedom of speech and secularism, the French president had to resort to uniquely ill-suited measures of banning pro-palestine marches and protests altogether, before a court declared it illegal. So, so much of anti-Semitic hatred was there!
In Germany, of all places, despite such stringent measures of their own against pro-Jihadist ‘marches’, their own anti-Semitism watchdog’s boss had to issue a warning to Jews to ‘not wear kippah (traditional Jewish skullcap) in public’. (Talk about ‘Jewish Religious Freedom’ in Germany.)
Worse still, Denmark and German security agencies actually uncovered a Hamas terrorists conspiracy intending to attack and murder Jews on EU soil, leading to at least 7 arrests – with Denmark announcing a widening of the investigation soon after.
By the way, there was a similar incident, in Harvard (where else? *eye-rolls*) of US, of all places: a so called free speech absolutist country. Here, Harvard Chabad House’s Rabbi was asked to take down their menorah each night after lighting it during their Hanukkah festival, ‘over fears of vandalism and how it wont look good for ivy-league school.’*slow-claps*
And all that, is apart from the regular hate-marches, comprising 10 of thousands, even lakhs, sometimes half a million people, heinous monsters really, being allowed on the streets of ‘civilized west’, displaying utterly bigoted placards and screaming genocidal slogans like ‘From river to the sea, Palestine will be free!’ which implies destruction of the Jewish state of Israel (that’s between Jordan river and Mediterranean sea) and all the Jews within. Where police have regularly made arrests too — But was largely found interpreting meaning of ‘Jihad’ for the benefit of… I guess, ‘kaffirs.’
And of course, how can we forget Ukraine, actually being championed by the west, for doing what they regularly and stridently condemn Bharat and Hindus for: a Ukrainian, extremist version of Christi-tva: Regular harrassment topped by their parliament considering an actual law ‘completely banning’ the religious faiths/sects whose holy-centers lie outside their national borders and in fact in enemy countries. (for more details on that giant, western hypocrisy, read my 2 part articles here and here).
But, for a cliffhanger end in this part 1 of the plot for the fiction called religious freedom, let’s move the needle in opposite direction.
(To be continued…)
