This is another thing I noticed last month that slipped our nationalist, pro-Hindu media’s attention. And its especially important given it concerns our national integration.
Before going further, I’d like the readers to search following terms in google, (exactly as I say, including double quotes) :
“self-determination” kashmir New York Times
“self-determination” kashmir Washington Post
“self-determination” kashmir BBC
“self-determination” kashmir The Guardian
“self-determination” kashmir DW
“self-determination” kashmir Al Jazeera
“self-determination” kashmir Sydney Morning Herald
“self-determination” kashmir CBS
“self-determination” kashmir Freedom House
“self-determination” kashmir The Economist
“self-determination” kashmir France24
“self-determination” kashmir Haaretz
“self-determination” kashmir Los Angeles Times
Plus any other Abrahmic-Leftist outlet you can think of latching themselves to so called debate on “self-determination” Kashmir.
And then look at the the kind of repulsive anti-Hindu, anti-India filthy lies and propaganda these supposedly neutral, freedom-loving, pro-democratic alleged news services (and ‘not extended arms of western Deep State’ as they’ll be quick to protest), produce within 1st two pages of such a google search.
Hardly anyone would be mentioning Kashmiri Hindu genocide and ethnic cleansing in this so-called “quest for Islamist separatist terrorists’ right to self-determination.”
But this is what they all are after: Self-determination. Plebiscite. Referendum. Under “honest” UN watchers and observers.
Now, here’s a thing I noticed on 27th august. (but which apparently was in circulation much before that)
And so, I want you to do one more search in Google.
Ukraine referendum sarkozy
Or how about just shortening it a bit? How about a last search with the following:
Sarkozy Ukraine
A couple of snapshots I’m attaching as a statutory warning here, so you don’t feel ambushed by me or end up walking blind into a storm of outrage.
But, do check out the articles that these results throw up and drink the poisonous anti-hindu anti-India hypocrisy of the western-backed-abrahmics – whether secular or religious doesn’t matter.
Because did you see the immediate, fierce, nasty, vicious and hateful vitriol against former French Presiden Nicolas Sarkozy by western left-liberal Deep State for saying exactly what they say about Kashmir?
“Sarko The Russian”, NYT called him in 1st paragraph.
“Shameful” was the Guardian’s 1st word in the headline, quoting Saqkozy’s former Intelligence Adviser.
“Russian Influencer” said France 24, quoting a Green Party MP who thought the interview itself was “Lunatic”, justifying its “slammed” headline.
“Russian Influencer” was also The Times’s choice of words for describing the accusation in headline.
“Disgraced’ and “Clown” was how Daily Mail went with it.
“Criticized”, went the LeMonde with “stirred outrage in Paris and Kyiv” in the 1st line of the actual article.
“Slammed” was the infamous Mediapart’s choice who chose to put ‘compromise’ in the bespoke quotes.
Responsible Statecraft has, well, at least a responsible take on it…so far as western Deep State and their pet attack-dog’s nearly violent reaction to sarkozy’s suggestion is concerned.
No-one bothered to focus on what Sarkozy himself said… nearly everyone from the “neutral, fair, truth-to-power, pro-democratic, mainstream” establishment media focused instead on the reactions to sarkozy.
So what did Sarkozy say, then?
“Without compromise, nothing will be possible and we run the risk that the situation will degenerate at any moment. This powder keg could have frightful consequences…
The Ukrainians… will want to reconquer what has been unjustly taken from them. But if they can’t manage it completely, the choice will be between a frozen conflict… or taking the high road out with referenda [in territories occupied by Russia since 2014] strictly overseen by the international community… any return to the way things were before [ie Ukrainian rule over Crimea] is an illusion. An incontestable referendum… will be needed to solidify the current state of affairs.
On NATO membership:
“Russia has to renounce all military action against its neighbors … Ukraine must pledge to remain neutral … NATO could at the same time affirm its willingness to respect and take into account Russia’s historic fear of being encircled by unfriendly neighbors.”
He also described as unrealistic and hypocritical suggestions that Ukraine can join the European Union in the foreseeable future, comparing this to Turkey’s hopeless decades-long efforts: “We are selling fallacious promises that will not be kept to.”
Question is simple:
Why is Sarkozy being blasted for saying what has only proven true 18 months into the conflict? After making starry eyes promises and then lakhs of people dead and entire cities decimated, where’s NATO and EU membership for Ukraine?
More importantly, if “self-determination” is ultimate post WW-II consensus by the liberal west which formulated Bretton Woods institutions to control the rest, why is it fiercely opposed in Ukraine?
Hell, there’s so much brouhaha and chest beating and shrill wailing from die hard islamo-leftists about Freedom of Speech and Press in Bharat, whenever we take action against anti-national and seditious/separatist statements. It is cited as proof of dying, nay, already dead and well-buried democracy in Bharat. Well, look at what happened here: Ukranian ambassador to France, Vadym Omelchenko, openly threatened – openly, let me repeat – a former president of France for his comments, saying: “I would not be surprised if the Prosecutor General of Ukraine is interested in the comments made to see if there are elements of a crime,” he said, adding Mr Sarkozy’s role as president of France during the Russia-Georgia conflict of 2008 had “resulted in Georgia losing 30 per cent of its territory”.
I see no-one even quietly sobbing for ‘Death of Democracy’ in Ukraine now, forget the melodramatic meltdown and long obituaries we see in case of heathen Hindus. Where’s the demand for sanctions on Ukraine, amigo?
And more importantly, should our NIA become interested in the comments by NYT, WaPo, DW, BBC, The Guardian, Haaretz, Freedom House, Financial Times, Daily Mail, Wall Street Journal etc. To see if there are elements of crime in them?
But lets come to the meat of the matter.
Everyone knows that following the west and George Soros sponsored violent and Euromaidan coup in Ukraine in 2014, there had been definite and proven presence of actual, card-carrying Neo-Nazis going on genocidal spree of eastern Ukrainians. Ukraine also imposed a linguistic apartheid against Russian speaking Ukrainians of the region. Artillery barrages from Neo-Nazi Azov battalions had already decimated these people’s homes and cities. Much before Russian Special Military Operation would start a decade later returning the favour to the rest of ukraine.
10,000 people were already dead (minimum) in Eastern Ukraine through this Ukrainian State mandated genocide – with active help of actual Ukrainian Nazis.
All because of the same reason it happened in Iraq (and countless other places): Eastern Ukraine being particularly Oil Rich + in this case, also being industrial powerhouse of the area.
Bottom line?
There’s a very strong possibility that if a referendum is held in Eastern Ukraine (plus Crimea) under “impartial UN observers”, it’s result might not be very different from what the referendum which Russia carried out an year ago, in Sep-2022, produced. Because of those people’s historical, cultural, civilizational and religious similarity to Russian mainland.
Occupation.
Let’s also discuss this term. Supposing that referendum in these parts cannot be held impartially unless the attacking force (in this case Russia) withdraws it’s troops, in accordance with international community and UN resolutions.
In the western press, there’s a deluge of articles, opinions, and podcasts calling it “Russian Occupation.”
Okay, let’s stick to that for argument’s sake.
But why do these same left-liberal, western islamo-leftist elites call situation in Kashmir as “Indian Occupation” any chance they get?
When the truth is that the situation is exact opposite.
Maharaja Hari Singh signed instrument of accession with Bharatiya Republic. All of Kashmir, thenceforth and forever, was ours after that. (Not that we needed a document to prove a Civilizational truth).
But even if we go by UN resolutions on that matter, what do they say, very clearly and unambiguously for any referendum to take place?
The very 1st point, first, says this:
The Government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavours:
(a) To secure the wvithdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State.
Furthermore, it asks Bharatiya forces to provide security in all of Kashmir.
But Pakistani ‘Tribesmen’, or we should just call what they were and still are : Jihadi Islamist Terrorists, they never went back to agreed upon internationally recognized borders of Pakistan at the time of partition. They continued to occupy Kashmiri territory – in express violation of UN resolutions.
Which means any occupation, if at all needing to be condemned by International Community and the west, is a Pakistani one.
Moreover (b) says:
To make known to all concerned that the measures indicated in this and the following paragraphs provide full freedom to all subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste, or party, to express their views and to vote on the question of the accession of the State, and that therefore they should co-operate in the maintenance of peace and order
But according to a 1974 pakistani unilateral move of PoK interim constitution, section 7(3), that says: “No person or political party in Azad Jammu and Kashmir shall be permitted to propagate against, or take part in activities prejudicial or detrimental to, the ideology of the State’s accession to Pakistan,” according to this, no-one in Pakistani occupied territories of Kashmir thus remains free to vote anything except “yes” (to Kashmiri accession to Pakistan) – unless they’re prepared to violate Pakistani constitutional laws and face its brutal Sharia punishments for it.
How then, can an ‘honest’ referendum be held at all – honest in the dictionary sense, and not western islamo-leftist’s interpretation of the word, that’s derived from Al-Taaqiya.
Blunt Truth
The Blunt Truth here is that left-liberals do not care for ‘self-determination’ of anyone – except those backed by western backed Abrahmics.
That’s why they want Hindus to give up their ancient lands to genocidal anti-hindu Islamists in the name of “self-determination”, but fiercely oppose even uncontestable referendums overseen by international community in Eastern Ukraine and in Crimea.
Hell, the outrageous brazenness of their hypcorisy is such that even when its Pakistan which was violating UN resolutions by illegally occupying kashmiri territories, they kept calling it as “Indian Occupation” to vilify our nation. And linking this so-called ‘injustice’ to our Hindu dharma, completely ignoring islamist terrorism and Kashmiri Hindu’s ethnic cleansing by them.
The Blunt truth is that all this is happening because we’re Hindus – pagan, polythiest, idol-worshippers, the unanimously hated kind in Abrahmic World; and Pakistanis and Ukrainians are Christians.
‘But wait a minute!’ you might say. ‘Isn’t Russia Christian too? In fact, isn’t Russia banning the subversive woke agendas because of it’s proudly Christian claims?’ And denouncing west as degenerate and decadent because of its ‘unchristian’ behaviour?‘
You’re right. That’s why I kept saying ‘Western-Backed Abrahmics.’
Because Christianity in Ukraine and Christianity in Russia… are not the same thing.
How? We’ll see in the next post.
