spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
39.1 C
Sringeri
Thursday, March 28, 2024

What the Income Tax survey on BBC hideouts tells us about foreigners’ and Bharatiya Opposition’s brown sahib mindset? – Part 5

The Joke

Because who defines what is dis-information?

GDI declares at as opposite of ‘inform’, as ‘to dis-inform; to deliberately mislead.’

But even if we go with that (and we never should, but just for argument’s sake), the criteria isn’t narrowed at all. Because how do you get to know if there was any ‘deliberate intent’ to dis-inform or mislead?

How do you get to know what goes inside someone’s head?

Admittedly determining ‘intent’ is a crucial part of any prosecutorial charge levied against any person or group. In many types of offenses.

And in this context, regarding free-speech laws in Bharat, if someone’s accused of what is colloquially but incorrectly known as ‘hate-speech’, prosecution needs to establish beyond all reasonable doubt the ‘deliberate and malicious intent’ behind that speech.

So determination of ‘deliberate intent’ is considered big enough that it’s not taken lightly at all. Across the world, what goes on inside a person’s head is something that’s generally decided by courts, not random tom, dick or harry calling itself an ‘expert.’ Unless technology evolved to a point we’d have mind-reading methods, its simply not done.

So how can GDI – or anyone frankly, lean precisely on ‘deliberate’ misleading of populace by a news outlet?

Maybe the news outlet did it mistakenly.

If they did it at all.

Maybe their targeting was not misleading at all.

Because every media consumption source has a target audience. People who like Jagjit Singh may not like Honey Singh. Someone who likes The Kashmir Files, may have boycotted Pathaan. A person who’s reading this article on this website, may not necessarily be interested in knowing what Alt-Facts or The Perpetual Liar have to say about it.

So perhaps a news-source’s content is not misleading at all to those who’re reading it. Maybe they’re more than capable of reading between the lines.

Furthermore, the biggest joke of GDI had to be its methodology and what it insists.

For example GDI has a 3 pillar index: Content, Operations and Context.

In Content Pillar, only 2 managed an average score of more than 90. 1 was The Financial Express, the other was a Benagli outlet named Sangbad Pratidin – which is owned by a, I kid you not, a TMC member! The other grouse of GDI is the absence of authorship of news articles. I mean sure, GDI agrees that ‘there might be strong political and editorial reasons for providing less information (targeted violence and killing of journalists is prevalent in India)’

See? See the backhanded attack on our Institutional systems? Even in the guise of sympathy? It’s as if Bharat is a warzone of Middle-East.

But despite all the pretense of sympathy, GDI’s stone-cold heart didn’t take into account this ‘risk’ which they themselves believe in; hiding behind the cover of overall ‘lack of trust in media’ they still insist that people writing for news outlets must take a byline.

I mean, barring aside everything else, do you notice the cyclical nature of this hypocrisy?

It’s GDI’s self-proclaimed job to ensure trust-in-media by eliminating disinformation. According to them people are afraid to take byline in Bharat because of ‘violent risks to their life’. But then GDI complains that in Bharat, overall trust in media is low anyway, even if they do take the ‘life-threatening risk’ to report accurately. And hence because of that, it insists people must still take a byline despite the violent threat to their lives.

That sure becomes super-confusing. And anyway…

What do you prioritize?

Alleged risk of disinformation or alleged risk of death?

And if journalists are killed following GDI’s instructions, would GDI take responsibility for that, and insist on RSF to absolve our country from any wrongdoing?

And the recipe to get out of this jam, according to GDI, is to follow The Economist’s anonymity model for reporting! The same Economist, whose alleged ‘Economic Intelligence Unit’s data to judge Bharatiya Democracy in 2022 is still based on data they collected from 2012!

Even without that hypothetical question of responsibility (let alone responsible jouranlism), there’s no co-relation between disinformation and threat to journalists in any case. At least not in the sense of the widely believed misconception.

The oft-repeated example of far-left Urban Naxal Gauri Lankesh, who was allegedly killed by Bajrang Dal members. She was convicted – let me repeat, CONVICTED of defamation. She was the one who peddled lies and disinformation in Bharat against Hindus!

The other famous case where Alt-Facts, The Perpetual Liar, donation fraud accused and even Twitter was dragged to court, was the Loni gaziabad assault case, where anti-Hindu haters had claimed that a vile old muslim liar whose beard was cut and he was forced to chant Jai Shri Ram, happened, because he was a Muslim and his attacker a Hindu. The truth was the liar Muslim man used to sell taveez, his attacker bought one, but it brought harmful effects to his home including a miscarriage of his wife.

Following which the attacker beat up the vile old lying Muslim taveez-maker because of that – with no communal angle at all.(By the way, next time you want to buy a taveez from any Muslim man after seeing an urduwod movie, think about what it could do to you… even after suffering any possible life-threatening side-effects against you and your loved ones.)

Next up, Arnab Goswami was thrown in jail, because of a bogus case that a vicious anti-Hindu cabal dug up almost literally from grave and falsely accused him of abetment-to-suicide. The case was recently dismissed, Arnab given a clean chit and even before that, there were revelations thanks to disgraced Police commissioner Parambir Singh that he’d suffered because anti-Hindu MVA govt. wanted to shut him up.

But the ultimate world cup for “disinformation” should go to this: Donation fraud accused and her ilk kept spreading a tonne of disinformation about Modi for 2 whole goddamned decades! Including a possible witchcraft where corrupt murder convict IPS Sanjeev Bhatt and sell-out minister Haren Pandya would claim to be in 2 places at once! In the end it turned out, they were lying and were only in one place, and that place was not the one where they claimed to have heard Modi giving the order to let Hindus have their way with Muslims to teach them a lesson. All this was proven in a court of law.

In fact the whole BBC 2-part documentary is nothing but a giant load of 2 hour long dis-information itself!

GDI – which is funded by British Government too – has absolutely no problem to that sort of disinformation being peddled in the name of “free-press”, at the expense of, literally, the British Taxpayer.

But we got ahead of ourselves, let’s stay on track.

For Operations Pillar of GDI, it accuses entire media industry in Bharat – let me repeat: entire spectrum of Bharatiya news outlets it examined, to be able to collectively score only 35 (with top marks being 100.)

Only 1 outlet managed a score of above 90, 4 scored above 70 and none, not a single one of them managed to touch a 100.

So what is this so-called ‘Operations Pillar’?

It’s about the operational structure of a news outlet. The owner, founder, editors, managers, funders, any political or corporate connections etc.

Among those 56 GDI examined, 12 shared who owns the outlet, 9 disclosed funding sources, 10 declared editorial independence in policies and only 5 had complete policy regarding corrections and subsequent publication of that correction.

They also say if you don’t follow RSF’s established standards of Journalism encompassed in JIT, you’re essentially publishing disinformation. Basically.

This urge from transparency, when GDI’s funding from US State Department’s CIA Front NED was pulled because “they weren’t even made aware” of a new partner joining the GDI that was targeting American conservative outlets!

But it goes much further than that, and I’ll come to it shortly.

For the Context Pillar, surprisingly, all Bharatiya sites performed good. (but alas, ‘room for improvement’ according to white west’s standards still remain.)

And it’s here I first caught attention of something that I should’ve noticed way earlier (curse me! I’m just a simple guy, not from a tribe of intellectual giants, the the likes of JSD, Rajeev Malhotra, Konrad Elst, Sanjev Sanyal or Vikram Sampath.)

According to GDI:

The Context pillar findings are based on an independent survey conducted to measure informed online readers’ perceptions of brand trust in the media sites included in our sample for India.34

Wait, wait, wait…Hold up! What the bloody hell is “informed online readers’ perception”?

What does that even mean?

Does it mean all other people are “severely mis-informed by-default?”

I didn’t want to believe it, so I checked the reference no. “34”, and alas…there it was!

34 The informed readers sample used by GDI is based on YouGov’s ‘catalyst audience’: a group considered to be the top 10 percent of its country panel, composed of change-makers drawn from civil society, business, politics, media, the third sector and beyond. They are defined by their recent activities, which include entrepreneurialism, leadership and activism. Typical members of this group include business and social entrepreneurs, organisational leaders, and political activists. The survey for India included 720 respondents and was conducted from 5 to 19 October 2020.

This group of elite 10% — In whose list the filthy traitorous ‘Civil Society’ is named the very 1st – which is being defined as ‘Typical members of this group include business and social entrepreneurs, organizational leaders, and political activists’this cabal, would tentatively be called in Bharat as ‘Khan Market gang, Lutyens Elite, Tukde-Tukde gang, Soft-Jihadis – even hard Jihadis, Urban Naxals – and yes, real Naxals’, unless otherwise specified.

Which is when I decided to check the other wonderful creatures who may have been responsible for creating other parts of this alleged “survey.”

Under the Data collection tab, it begins with:

Each of the Indian domains was assessed by two analysts who were trained on the GDI framework according to a codebook that provides detailed instructions for assessing each indicator.

Two analysts.

Let me repeat – only TWO bloody analysts were asked to assess 56 news media outlets whose collective audience might be more than – and taking a very conservative estimate here – at least half the total population of the country. It’s still 70 crore people.

But even if you keep aside the mind-boggling math, who were these two exceptional analysts who managed to do that?

GDI is totally silent on that.

Means we know nothing except total a metric tonne of zero, about these analysts’ personal biases.

And because of which it should come as no surprise that the identities of this ‘informed online readers’, those villayati version of Lutyens Elite and Khan Market gang of 420…err, I mean 720 people who were made up of ‘civil society, business, politics, media, the third sector and beyond’, again nothing except total blackout. We don’t know zilch about these creatures own personal biases which curated GDI’s survey, because it is also never made public.

For that matter, let’s remember, again, that GDI doesn’t make even its final ratings of news outlets public. It claims to inform the outlets of its own looming hafta-wasooli threat, by secretly conveying to the outlets what it thinks of them, but it doesn’t share that assessment with public.

And let me remind you: this is the GDI, which is grumbling so-hard about “lack of transparency in the Operation Pillar of Bharatiya media scene”. It’s hurt so bohot hard that it couldn’t award more than max 35 (passing?) marks out of total 100 because it doesn’t know who runs what and how in Bharatiya media scene.

It’s an important point, perhaps the most important…but I’ll come to that later.

For this episode… finally, its time for the main event…!

Ben Nimmo was a NATO press officer, he later Joined NATO’s Atlanic Council, then moved to Meta (parent company of facebook). Atlantic Council received a whopping 768,085 dollars from Open Society Foundations of George Soros. Graphika was awarded an even more whopping 5 million for even more censorship.

Detailing his further roles for, indeed spreading disinformation about completely fabricated and fake ‘Trump’s Russia Collusion hoax.’

Nic Newman of RIJ, well… I’d let his profile do the talking:

Olaf Steenfadt, from Reporters without Borders, well, nothing needs to be said about RSF’s anti-Hindu/anti-Bharat bias considering its majorly funded by George Soros, the reporting for which is immense. You can google it yourself.

Cristina Tardáguila (Lupa), is a senior program director at ICFJ, which has worked extensively with George Soros’s OSF. It recently gave platform to donation fraud acused and a proven liar alleged journalist.

For Laura Zommer and her links with George Soros’s OSF, check it here (you can use google translate)

And presiding over the whole blackmail scheme is Finn Heinrich directly from George Soros’s OSF!

Apart from international Soros backed bullies, the whole GDI exercise in Bharat was done in collaboration with CIS: Center for Internet and Society. It’s an NGO. (well, obviously!)

The first time it caught my attention is from 2012, when UPA had blocked some 300 urls in the wake of assam riots. An order which ended up getting whole websites being blocked. Including that of Journalist Kanchan Gupta, (who today serves as an advisor to I&B Ministry). After the predictable outcry, UPA govt. had convened a meeting with ‘stakeholders.’ Which included:

  • Prabir Purkaystha of Delhi Science Forum… but more commonly known as Founder and Editor in Chief of anti-national propaganda outlet Newsclick which is notoriously known for allegations of having links with Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda arm! Part of that money was allegedly also gone to Urban Naxal Gautam Navlakha, for which he was interrogated in jail.
  • Paranjoy Roy Thakurta, who was President for Foundation of Media Professionals, but is more commonly known for being sued for defamation by…guess what? Adani group! . The articles were published in Economic and Political Weekly, The Wire and later, for another set of articles in (again!) Newsclick. His name found mention even in that notorious hitjob called ‘Hindenberg report’ which many are now suspecting to be a hired gun working for George Soros, who intends to enact a regime-change to install khangress back in power.
  • Apar Gupta, who heads Internet Freedom Foundation, and has been vociferously opposed to IT Rules 2021.
  • And here, in this forum, I also found CIS and its brilliant analyst Pranesh Prakash.

If that name rings a bell, its because Mr. Prakash had been a leading light in exposing The perpetual Liar’s gargantuan fraud committed against Amit Malviya by way of accusing him of having superpowers over Meta.

One thing that always troubled me in that episode, was: Why would a hateful monster like Siddharth Varadarjan share his food source’s identity with Pranesh Prakash? Those 2 “independent analysts”, whom it had claimed to be the people who’d verified his and Devesh Kumar’s various tech-fictions? And why would Mr. Prakash be so active in investigating the piece himself?

So I looked up at CIS itself.

Again.

Because the 1st I’d looked it up, it was way before.

Turns out its only since late 2018, they had started receiving foreign funding.

And behold…

  • For anti-Hindu/anti-Bharat Omidyar and its attempts to bribe MHA officials for allowing illegal foreign funding, I’d already written here.
  • For EAST WEST MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE  and its links with leftist NGO bullies like Soros, Ford and Rockfeller foundation, read it here.
  • For Hewlett Foundation’s FCRA license revocation in 2022 and govt. putting it in the watch list, read here.
  • For MacArthur Foundation’s anti-Hindu mischiefs, read here and here.
  • And Wikimedia is the owner of “truth has a left bias” anti-Hindu/anti-Bharat Wikipedia. Which has blacklisted, then created a vicious propaganda page for OpIndia, Swarajya and TFIpost (Side note: see the money they’re just donating away to CIS. Next time they ask for your money as if without it, they’ll go bankrupt the next day, remember the crores of money they’re throwing at just, one, Bharatiya, NGO.)

The point is that, this, is the CIS, in whose collaboration GDI had “researched” its India study for ‘disinformation in Bharatiya media.’

And this is GDI itself, an assortment of people on George Soros’ payroll directly or indirectly. Literally or metaphorically.

Finally, at this point, it might seem tempting to believe that perhaps The perpetual Liar’s story about Instagram giving superpowers to people like Amit Malviya for deleting anyone’s content he didn’t like…it was true after all.

Because if Pranesh Prakash of CIS was on the payroll of anti-national NGOs (which themselves are in cahoots with western Deep State), to the point he was, in fact, paid by Facebook itself in the past, its possible that he and his allies in the west, for obvious reasons, coerced everyone to take back their support vouching for The perpetual Liar’s story.

But we need not take Pranesh Prakash’s words or anyone else’s who stood by or backtracked on their statement, as gospel truth.

We need only to see the alleged “evidence” getting ripped apart in public that was understandable by everyone.

For example – and I couldn’t help saying it – the whole “aap chronology samjhiye” saga that played out between dates and day mismatch across a whole year due to being dumbly photoshopped on emails they provided as “evidence.”

(Gif Source: OpIndia)

Not to mention, that a “cursory” assessment of the whole affair would’ve been made clear to everyone that The perpetual Liar had “jumped” the gun.

And finally, an outlet like The perpetual Liar staking its entire credibility (such as it was) on a story like this, seems hard to believe if they hadn’t believed in it themselves enough to pull off this scam. Even if we believe that they were in on it from the start and were well-paid to suffer the tsunami of ridicule washing away all claims of “factual reporting” from then on and for all eternity, there’s no motive that makes sense.

It only helped BJP and Hindus, and as we saw, western Deep State is *not* a friend of Bharat or Hindus.

Most of all, The perpetual Liar vs Meta – feat. Amit Malviya…all of it happened in Public, over facts and numbers that can be verified… independently of someone’s ‘opinion.’

The whole shady stuff that’s going on with GDI – and especially regarding its Bharat study…its most important “pillars” (pun definitely intended) for those claims are neither public, and in fact, are, entirely based on the shaky ground of “opinion”. Not to mention the only scientific thing in that disgusting narrative becomes a bad joke due to crippled methodology.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram &  YouTube. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Related Articles

Abhinandan Pande
Abhinandan Pande
Abhinandan Pande is an aspiring Spy Thriller writer who sees the threats to Bharat as they are - An institutionalized Abrahmic/Left-Liberal revulsion for Hindus' Right to Exist.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Sign up to receive HinduPost content in your inbox
Select list(s):

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Thanks for Visiting Hindupost

Dear valued reader,
HinduPost.in has been your reliable source for news and perspectives vital to the Hindu community. We strive to amplify diverse voices and broaden understanding, but we can't do it alone. Keeping our platform free and high-quality requires resources. As a non-profit, we rely on reader contributions. Please consider donating to HinduPost.in. Any amount you give can make a real difference. It's simple - click on this button:
By supporting us, you invest in a platform dedicated to truth, understanding, and the voices of the Hindu community. Thank you for standing with us.