Another horrifying case of mass grooming, blackmail, and rape—eerily reminiscent of the infamous 1992 Ajmer scandal—has emerged from Bijainagar, Beawar district, Rajasthan. Islamists first lured a minor with a mobile phone, then sexually exploited her and forced her to bring more victims into their predatory network. The accused, operating in a coordinated manner, lured young girls with expensive gifts like mobile phones, entrapped them in sexual exploitation, and later used threats to force them into Islamic conversion.
According to police and Jagran reports, the gang targeted school-going minor girls, monitored their activities for months, and manipulated them into relationships. Once trapped, the victims were sexually assaulted, and explicit videos were recorded to blackmail them. The accused allegedly pressured the girls to recruit more victims, expanding their network of exploitation.
The horrifying details surfaced when a victim was caught stealing money from her home, leading her parents to investigate. Upon questioning, the girl exposed the grooming syndicate, prompting locals to surround the police station in protest, demanding immediate action.
How was the crime uncovered?
DSP Sajjan Singh revealed that on February 16, 2025, three separate cases were registered based on the complaints of the victims’ families. One of the families grew suspicious after noticing that their daughter had stolen money. When they started monitoring her, they found her engaged in frequent phone conversations. Upon further questioning, she admitted that the phone had been given to her by a youth from Islamic community.
A deeper investigation uncovered the involvement of more girls and additional accused. So far, seven suspects have been arrested, including a minor. The police are gathering evidence from the victims and interrogating the accused to establish the full extent of the crime. Authorities have assured that a thorough investigation will be conducted, and strict action will be taken against the culprits.
Arrests and investigation
Following widespread public outrage, the police arrested seven individuals, including two juveniles, while three others remain at large. The arrested suspects—Rehan Mohammad (son of Jaan Mohammad), Sohail Mansoori (son of Anwar Hussain), Luqman alias Sohaib (son of Mohammad Usman), Armaan Pathan (son of Kalu Khan), and Sahil Qureshi (son of Mohammad Sabir)—have been booked under the POCSO Act and relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita (BNS). The identities of the two juveniles have been withheld. Authorities continue to investigate the case, aiming to uncover the full extent of the network and track down additional perpetrators.
One Islamist accused is a minor
According to Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP) Bhupendra Sharma, six of the accused—Rehan Mohammad, Sohail Mansoori, Luqman alias Sohaib, Armaan Pathan, Sahil Qureshi, and Afraz—are between 18 and 20 years old and have been presented before the court. Additionally, one minor has been detained in connection with the case.
In a dramatic turn of events, lawyers in Ajmer assaulted the accused while they were being brought out of the court. A massive crowd had already gathered outside the courthouse, including members of the legal community. The police, under heavy security, tried to escort the accused inside the court as quickly as possible. However, when they were being brought out, a lawyer in a black coat and traditional hair bun managed to slap one of the accused. This triggered a reaction, and other lawyers joined in, attacking the accused. The police struggled to control the situation and managed to escort the accused out of the premises with great difficulty. Within minutes, footage of the assault went viral on social media.
Lawyers refuse to represent the accused
The Bijaynagar Bar Association strongly condemned the incident that took place on February 17, 2025. In a unanimous decision, the association announced that it would not represent the accused in court. The lawyers urged the police administration to conduct a fair investigation and ensure that the perpetrators face the harshest punishment under the law.
According to the complaint, the accused lured the girls by giving them mobile phones and frequently contacted them. They allegedly intercepted the girls on their way to school, threatening them to accompany them to cafés. If they refused, the accused reportedly threatened to kill their families. The girls were also forced to recite religious prayers, observe fasts, and wear attire dictated by the accused.
Another case in Tonk: Scheduled Caste girl gang-raped, blackmailed
Meanwhile, in Tonk, Rajasthan, another horrifying case has emerged where a 14-year-old Scheduled Caste girl was blackmailed with explicit videos and subjected to repeated gang rape. As per Dainik Bhaskar, the main accused befriended the minor on social media, coerced her into sharing private videos, and later distributed them among his friends. The victim was then repeatedly sexually assaulted under threat of public humiliation.
Her father filed a complaint on February 15, and police have since registered a case under the POCSO Act. The investigation is currently led by CO Rajesh Vidyarthi.
Ajmer scandal 2.0? Growing concern over rising crimes against Hindu girls
The two disturbing incidents have sparked outrage across Rajasthan, with Hindu organizations and local communities demanding stricter enforcement of laws against such grooming and Islamic conversion syndicates. Many are calling for fast-track trials and maximum punishment for the accused to prevent further such crimes. Authorities have assured swift action and are closely monitoring the situation to ensure justice for the victims.
Amid rising public anger, victims’ families and members of Hindu organizations, along with Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Sajjan Singh, gathered at the Nasirabad court complex. Given the tense atmosphere, additional police forces were deployed as a precautionary measure. The crowd demanded strict action against the accused, with Hindu organizations in Ajmer and Beawar districts expressing their outrage over the incident.
Various Hindu groups have submitted memorandums to administrative and police officials, urging severe punishment for the perpetrators. The case is being compared to the infamous 1992 Ajmer blackmail scandal, and there is growing suspicion that an organized criminal network may be involved behind the scenes.
Love jihad and grooming are not orchestrated by some mastermind in Pakistan or Deoband—they are driven by radical maulanas and local Jamaats, deeply embedded in their communities. For these fanatics, targeting Hindu girls and pushing for conversions is not just an agenda but a way of life, as natural to them as their five daily prayers. This systematic assault on Hindu identity, cheered and justified as part of their so-called historical legacy, is nothing short of a war against Bharat itself.
These criminals not part of any gang, have a common charasterics of belonging to the Mohammadan community. And this phenomenon is frighteningly common across the country. As the news report says, “they intercepted the girls on their way to school, threatening them to accompany them to cafés. If they refused, the accused reportedly threatened to kill their families. The girls were also forced to recite religious prayers, observe fasts, and wear attire dictated by the accused.”
And on these streets these criminal have a total sway, and Hindus are conspicuously absent. Therefore, the zombie like parental behavior is not difficult to understand because of this, nor these mohammadan criminals’s threat to kill family members.
Actually, it is not difficult to observe that Hindu criminals on street just become the lackeys of these Mohammadan gangsters, the later are united unsaid in their religious solidarity, even when they may not know each other.
Islamists and their Hindu lackeys in media and politics would start screaming ‘Islamophobia’ when we say that Hindu organizations on the street would only be able to save the country from the unchecked islamization. Hindu organizations in streets are needed not to control Hindu girls, but to control these criminals irrespective of their religious label. Police and laws are not useful here for these social issues. Leaving everything conveniently on government (after a crime out of hundreds becomes public) is basically escapism.
Therefore, it would not be wrong to say that lawyers hitting the criminals in court premises or refusing to represent them is not a sign of strength, but that of an impotent anger, an inexcusable emotional reaction entirely against Hindu and Shraman values. Do we want to become a Hindu version of despicable Mohammadan countries?