spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
21.8 C
Sringeri
Sunday, June 29, 2025
Home Blog Page 333

Mallikarjun Kharge questions Maha Kumbh, mocks Amit Shah and others for taking holy dip in Prayagraj

0
kharge

“Mallikarjun Kharge questions Maha Kumbh, mocks Amit Shah and others for taking holy dip in Prayagraj”, Opindia, January 27, 2025:

“Congress chief Mallikarjurn Kharge was seen questioning the Maha Kumbh 2025 and the arrangements made by the government for it. He insinuated that the expenses for Maha Kumbh are met by taking away or preventing social welfare of the poor in the country.

“Ganga main dubki lene se gareebi dur hogi kya” (will poverty be eliminated by taking the holy dip in the Ganga river), Kharge asked adding that he does not want to hurt anyone’s religious sentiments but when there are poor children lacking food, when the people are struggling to find employment, our government leaders are competing with each other to take the holy dip in the Ganga. They keep on taking dip after dip until they get a good enough photo for the TV cameras. But they do not care about the real issues plaguing the people.

Speaking in Mhow, Madhya Pradesh, at the Jai Bapu, Jai Samvidhan, Jai Bheem event where Rahul Gandhi was also present, Kharge also added that Modi and Amit Shah have committed so many sins that no amount of holy dips will grant them access to heaven……”

Read the full article at Opindia.com

As AAP fails to clean Yamuna, Kejriwal claims the BJP govt in Haryana used “biological weapons” to poison its waters

0
(Image Source : Opindia)
(Image Source : Opindia)

“As AAP fails to clean Yamuna, Kejriwal claims the BJP govt in Haryana used “biological weapons” to poison its waters”, Opindia, January 27, 2025:

“Ahead of the much-awaited Delhi assembly elections, former chief minister and AAP supremo attempted to deflect the blame of his government’s failure to clean the Yamuna river onto the BJP, alleging that its government in Haryana poisoned its waters.

“The people of Delhi get water to drink from Haryana and UP. In Yamuna, water flows into Delhi from Haryana. BJP’s Haryana govt has poisoned the water in Yamuna. However, the Delhi Jal Board were vigilant enough to stop that water from coming to Delhi otherwise – that would have caused mass genocide in Delhi,” said Kejriwal, without offering any evidence to back his claim.

Making outlandish claims that the BJP government in Haryana leaned on “biological weapons” to poison Yamuna, Kejriwal said, “The BJP govt has mixed such kind of poison in the water that cannot be treated even by the water treatment plants. It has caused water scarcity in one-third of Delhi. Such politics is done by two enemy countries – like the USA bombed Japan with nuclear bombs. A few countries use biological weapons to poison river water. But, the same has been done by the BJP govt…..”

Read the full article at Opindia.com

HP: Anti-Hindu practices by panchayat committee alleged at Peer Nigaha temple, Basoli village in Una district; complaint filed

0
peer nigaha islam anti hindu basoli village

A formal request has been submitted to the Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister by a resident of Haroli, demanding immediate government intervention in the management of the Peernigaha Temple, located in the Basoli village of Una district in the state. It is alleged that there are multiple instances of mismanagement and deviations from Hindu religious traditions, that are insulting to the sentiments of Hindus across the state.

The Peernigaha Temple, managed by the local panchayat committee, has been accused of misrepresenting its historical and religious identity and integrating practices deemed inappropriate by Hindu devotees. The key allegations include:

  1. Temple aesthetics resembling a Mosque: It is alleged that the temple’s design and aesthetics, including its white appearance, resemble those of a mosque, which contradict Hindu architectural traditions.
  2. Historical misrepresentation: While the temple is historically linked to the Pandavas of the Mahabharata era, it is being portrayed as the shrine of Lakhdata Peer, an Islamic figure from post-1200 AD. The Shivling, traditionally consecrated by the Pandavas in temples across Himachal Pradesh, is absent.
  3. Integration of non-Hindu practices: The complaint alleges the inclusion of practices such as offering a chadar in an Islamic manner, which is inconsistent with Hindu customs.
  4. Inappropriate murtis and symbols: The installation of an idol of Aisha and the depiction of Sai Baba (also referred to as Chand Mia) in the Kailash Parvat area of the temple were cited as violations of Hindu religious norms. The presence of the Islamic symbol “786” on the back of the murti of Bajrang Bali was also highlighted as an example of the mismanagement.
  5. Degradation of Hindu deities: Bhairav Dev and Bhagwan Bajrang Bali are portrayed as gatekeepers (dwarpals) of Lakhdata Peer, and is a profound insult to Hindu religious beliefs.
  6. Absence of Brahmin pandits: The temple lacks qualified Brahmin pandits to conduct rituals and daily aartis, which also seem to have Islamic influences.
  7. Misuse of funds: Temple funds misappropriated and the management allegedly prioritizing monetary gains over religious integrity.
  8. Negative influence of visitors from Punjab: The influx of visitors from Punjab could be linked to issues such as crime, drug abuse, and reports of hotel establishments engaging in illicit activities, including sex rackets.

The complaint also raised concerns about similar practices spreading to other temples in Himachal Pradesh, where Hindu deities are allegedly being positioned as subordinates to figures from other faiths. Residents warned of the potential for unrest if such practices continue unchecked.

The resident has requested that the government take over the administration of the temple to prevent further mismanagement and ensure funds are used for the benefit of the Hindu Samaj and that once corrective measures are implemented, the temple should be returned to community management under appropriate safeguards.

Furore over Dalwai’s comments on Maha Kumbh sparks mixed reactions from political leaders

0
(Image Source : IANS)
(Image Source : IANS)

Senior Maharashtra Congress leader Husain Dalwai’s comments on the Maha Kumbh in Uttar Pradesh have sparked mixed reactions from both Shiv Sena and the Congress. While Shiv Sena leaders have demanded an apology for his remarks, the Congress has defended Dalwai, asserting that his statement holds the truth.

The controversy began after Dalwai criticised the arrangements for the Maha Kumbh at the Triveni Sangam, the confluence of the Ganga, Yamuna, and the mythical Saraswati rivers.

He described the arrangements as “insufficient and lacking in basic amenities” to manage the large influx of devotees, warning that this could potentially lead to the “spread of diseases.”

Maharashtra Minister Uday Samant responded to Dalwai’s comment saying, “Questions are being raised about mismanagement. We are proud of the presence of our sants and sages. I request Dalwai Sahab not to create such issues. The situation is good there under the leadership of Yogi sahib. Lakhs of people who go there say that the situation there is very good. But it is not good to raise questions about every programme or event.”

Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande strongly condemned Dalwai’s statement comparing the Maha Kumbh with Hajj, calling it “nonsense.”

“Prayagraj is the confluence of three holy rivers. People who practice Hinduism and spirituality will not say such nonsense. Husain Dalwai should apologise to the entire Hindu community. If everyone starts talking about religion like this, it will cause tension in the country, and Dalwai will be responsible for it. Comparing the Maha Kumbh with Hajj is a foolish thing,” she stated.

In contrast, Congress leader Bhai Jagtap downplayed the issue, emphasising that Dalwai’s comments were personal.

He mentioned, “This is his personal statement, and I am not talking about it. Videos of women, children, and elderly devotees from the Maha Kumbh show the situation on the ground, and it is clear that the arrangements there are not as promised. Social media reveals the truth.”

Jagtap highlighted that the Maha Kumbh is an event of great faith and sacred significance, and despite shortcomings in infrastructure, people continue to attend with devotion. He also mentioned the previous Kumbh held in Nashik, Maharashtra, under the state government’s oversight, noting that such events require proper management and facilities.

(This article has been published via a syndicated feed)

Karnataka Police make breakthrough in gruesome cow slaughter case; Accused Mohammed Faizil shot while trying to escape

0
(Image Source : Organiser)
(Image Source : Organiser)

“Karnataka Police make breakthrough in gruesome cow slaughter case; Accused Mohammed Faizil shot while trying to escape”, Organiser, January 27, 2025:

“In a shocking incident that has stirred public outcry, local police have made a significant breakthrough in the brutal case of a pregnant cow being slaughtered. The horrific act involved the accused cutting off the cow’s legs and head, then abandoning the calf inside its stomach while stealing only the meat.

The prime accused, identified as Mohammed Faizil, was shot in the leg by police after he allegedly attempted to attack them and flee during his arrest. The incident unfolded near Kasaragod, with the accused now receiving treatment at the Honnavar government hospital.

Earlier, police had apprehended 41-year-old Taufeeq from Valki, Honnavar, in connection with the case. The brutal slaying of the pregnant cow occurred in Kondakuli village, Salkodu, where it was later uncovered that the perpetrators had supplied the meat to a wedding function. Authorities launched a comprehensive investigation following the state government’s serious attention to the matter, receiving directives from Home Minister and district police officials…….”

Read the full article at Organiser.org

Bharat and Indonesia: Strengthening Ties for a Dynamic Indo-Pacific Future

0
(Image Source : Awaz The Voice)
(Image Source : Awaz The Voice)

Significant benefits are anticipated from Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s Republic Day visit to India, which would further solidify the two countries’ bilateral ties.

The decision to invite Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto as the chief guest at India’s Republic Day Parade this year is a symbolic nod to the enduring and evolving relationship between the two nations. As India commemorates its Republic Day, it is worth reflecting on the rich history and the promising future of this bilateral partnership, which spans centuries and has significantly influenced the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific region.

India and Indonesia share a historical bond rooted in culture, and trade, and shared struggles for independence. The connection between these two civilizations dates back over two millennia, with philosophies such as Hinduism and Buddhism traveling from India to Indonesia. These shared spiritual traditions have left a profound impact on Indonesian culture, evident in its art, architecture, and folklore, including the enduring relevance of the Ramayana and Mahabharata. This cultural affinity was instrumental in forging the initial camaraderie between India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Indonesia’s founding President, Sukarno. Together, they laid the groundwork for the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) during the Bandung Conference in 1955, providing an independent platform for nations amidst the Cold War tensions. Sukarno’s presence as the chief guest at India’s first Republic Day celebrations in 1950 remains a testament to the deep respect and mutual admiration that has defined this bilateral relationship.

Despite this strong foundation, the India-Indonesia relationship has experienced fluctuations. Episodes such as the attack on the Indian embassy in Jakarta and Indonesia’s support for Pakistan during the 1965 war underscore moments of discord. However, the resilience of this partnership is evident in its recovery and growth over the years, particularly in the economic and strategic domains.

Today, India and Indonesia are natural partners in the Indo-Pacific, a region of critical importance in global geopolitics. The signing of the Treaty of Friendship in 1951 marked the formal beginning of their modern relationship, which has since evolved into a robust economic and strategic partnership. With bilateral trade reaching $26.69 billion in the fiscal year 2023-24, Indonesia has become one of India’s largest trading partners in the ASEAN region. The elevation of ties to a “New Comprehensive Strategic Partnership” in 2018 and the adoption of the “Shared Vision on Maritime Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific” have further solidified this alliance.

The Indo-Pacific strategy is central to India’s foreign policy, and Indonesia plays a pivotal role in this framework. Both nations face shared challenges from Chinese expansionism, particularly in the South China Sea. The joint naval exercises named after “Samudra” and “Garuda” reflect the maritime focus of their strategic collaboration. As Indonesia considers procuring Brahmos hypersonic missiles co-developed by India and Russia, the defense partnership between the two countries is poised to reach new heights. This acquisition would not only enhance Indonesia’s military capabilities but also strengthen the broader regional effort to counterbalance Chinese aggression.

The development of the Sabang Port, located at the entrance to the Strait of Malacca, exemplifies the strategic depth of India-Indonesia cooperation. First proposed in 2018, the port’s development has progressed slowly but is now expected to gain momentum with President Subianto’s visit. This port holds immense potential for India to secure its trade routes and expand its influence in the Indo-Pacific region. Improved connectivity and reduced logistical costs would benefit both nations, while the enhanced infrastructure could serve as a key hub for trade and tourism between India’s Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Southeast Asia. Additionally, the port would bolster the Indian Navy’s capacity to address security threats in the eastern Indian Ocean, underscoring the strategic significance of this collaboration.

In addition to defense and trade, India and Indonesia share opportunities for collaboration in addressing global challenges such as climate change, food security, and digital governance. Both nations are vulnerable to environmental risks, including rising sea levels, floods, and droughts. Joint efforts in sustainable finance and infrastructure development are essential for building resilience against these threats. Food security, a pressing concern for both countries, offers another avenue for cooperation. Indonesia’s plan to import 1 million metric tons of rice from India in 2025 highlights the interdependence between these two economies.

Digital governance presents an area of transformative potential for the India-Indonesia partnership. India’s advancements in developing world-class digital public infrastructure, including digital payments, identity management, and e-governance, could serve as a model for Indonesia. Collaborative efforts in these areas could not only strengthen Indonesia’s digital ecosystem but also foster greater economic integration and connectivity between the two nations. By leveraging digital innovation, India and Indonesia can drive economic growth and improve public services, enhancing the quality of life for their citizens.

The geopolitical dynamics of the Indo-Pacific have created both opportunities and challenges for India and Indonesia. While Indonesia has historically sought to balance its relationships with China and democracies like India, the increasing assertiveness of Chinese policies in the region has made this balancing act more difficult. For the India-Indonesia partnership to reach its full potential, Jakarta must prioritize deeper engagement with New Delhi. Recent reports suggesting that President Subianto would visit Pakistan after India highlighted Indonesia’s inclination to maintain equidistance. However, New Delhi’s diplomatic efforts ensured that the visit’s focus remained on strengthening India-Indonesia ties, reflecting the importance of this relationship in the current geopolitical context.

Myanmar presents another theater for collaboration between India and Indonesia. Both nations have a vested interest in stabilizing the region and have hosted Burmese Ethnic Armed Organisations (EAOs) to foster peace. By aligning their efforts in Myanmar, India and Indonesia can extend their influence and contribute to regional stability, showcasing the strategic depth of their partnership.

The evolving geopolitical landscape underscores the significance of the India-Indonesia partnership in shaping the future of the Indo-Pacific. By aligning their strategic priorities and deepening collaboration in key areas such as defense, digital governance, and regional stability, the two nations can emerge as pivotal players in countering shared challenges. President Subianto’s visit to India for Republic Day celebrations symbolizes a new chapter in this enduring relationship, one that holds immense promise for the future.

As India and Indonesia celebrate their shared history and chart a path forward, the potential for collaboration is boundless. From cultural and historical ties to strategic and economic partnerships, the India-Indonesia relationship is a testament to the power of mutual respect and shared aspirations. By working together, these two nations can not only secure their futures but also contribute to a more stable, prosperous, and inclusive Indo-Pacific region.

गाजियाबाद : होटलों में ले जाकर बार-बार किया दुष्कर्म, फिर मतांतरण का प्रयास; गिरफ्तार आरोपी ने पूछताछ में खोला सच

0

“Ghaziabad: होटलों में ले जाकर बार-बार किया दुष्कर्म, फिर मतांतरण का प्रयास; गिरफ्तार आरोपी ने पूछताछ में खोला सच”, दैनिक जागरण, जनवरी 26, 2025

“यूपी के गाजियाबाद में एक बार फिर से लव जिहाद का मामला सामने आया है। एक युवक ने महिला को अलग-अलग होटल में ले जाकर दुष्कर्म किया। आरोप है कि फिर उसने मतांतरण का प्रयास किया। अब पुलिस ने आरोपी युवक को गिरफ्तार कर लिया है। आरोपी युवक ने पुलिस पूछताछ में पूरा सच उगल दिया है। आगे विस्तार से पढ़िए पूरी खबर।

विजय नगर थाना क्षेत्र में लव जिहाद के लिए शादीशुदा महिला से दुष्कर्म कर मतांतरण के प्रयास का मामला सामने आया है। आरोपी युवक इमरान नौ जनवरी को महिला को अपने साथ बहलाकर ले गया था। आरोपी को पुलिस ने गिरफ्तार कर महिला को बरामद कर लिया है।

विजय नगर थाना क्षेत्र में रहने वाला युवक ग्रेटर नोएडा की फैक्ट्री में काम करता है। उसकी शादी दिसंबर 2023 में खोड़ा की रहने वाली युवती से हुई थी। महिला के पति का कहना है कि खोड़ा में ही रहने वाले इमरान नामक युवक से उनकी पत्नी की बातचीत होती थी। इसका पता उन्हें कई माह बाद चला। नौ जनवरी को उनकी पत्नी बिना बताए कहीं चली गईं। काफी तलाश करने पर भी जब कोई जानकारी नहीं मिली तब उन्होंने थाने में गुमशुदगी लिखा दी……”

पूरा लेख दैनिक जागरण पर पढ़ें

MUDA scam case: CM Siddaramaiah confirms ED notice to wife

0
karnataka congress govt fuel price hike freebies

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Monday confirmed that his wife, B.M. Parvathi has received a notice from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the MUDA scam case.

While answering a media question in this regard, the CM said, “Yes. She has received a notice.”

The Enforcement Directorate issued a notice to Parvathi, who is the second accused in the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam. The ED has also issued notice to the Urban Development Minister Byrathi Suresh, a close confidante of CM Siddaramaiah.

Sources said the notice was issued to Parvathi under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering (PMLA) Act. The notice, signed by senior ED officer Murali Kannan, has asked her to be present before the ED sleuths on January 28 (Tuesday).

The sources further revealed that this was the second notice to CM’s wife Parvathi by the ED. On the first occasion, Parvathi had sought two weeks citing the reasons of ill health, age and inability to appear before the ED officers. She had also pleaded with the officers to allow her to appear before them online. However, the ED has not considered the pleas.

It is revealed that since there is a possibility of the ED initiating legal measures against CM Siddaramaiah’s wife Parvathi this time, the CM’s family has approached the High Court to seek a stay on the notice by the ED.

The counsel for Parvathi requested the High Court bench to take up the petition on an emergency basis. Considering the request, the court has agreed to take up the petition by Monday.

Meanwhile, the High Court has taken up the hearing of a petition seeking the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the MUDA scam.

CM Siddaramaiah is accused number one in the MUDA case and the investigation is also being conducted against others who got the illegal allotments done through the MUDA.

In a setback to the Chief Minister, the ED, Bengaluru Zonal Office provisionally attached 142 immovable properties having an approximate market value of Rs 300 crore under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, in connection with the MUDA scam.

“The role of ex-MUDA commissioner D.B. Natesh has emerged as instrumental in illegal allotment of compensation sites to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife B.M. Parvathi,” said the ED in a statement on January 17.

Searches conducted during the investigation further revealed that a large number of sites, other than 14 sites allotted to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife B.M. Parvathi, have been illegally allotted by MUDA as compensation to real estate businessmen, who in turn sold these sites at profits and generated a huge amount of unaccounted cash.

Petitioner Snehamayi Krishna has alleged that illegal allotments by the MUDA amount to thousands of crores of rupees.

The ED said the profit generated has been laundered and shown as derived from legitimate sources.

“The searches also revealed that sites have been allotted in the name of benamis/dummy persons for the benefit of influential persons and real estate businessmen. The incriminating evidence with respect to payment of illegal gratification to then MUDA chairman and Commissioner in the form of immovable property, MUDA sites, cash, etc., were recovered,” the ED stated.

“The attached properties are registered in the name of various individuals who are working as real-estate businessmen and agents,” the ED said.

ED initiated an investigation on the basis of an FIR registered by the Lokayuktha Police Mysuru under various sections of IPC, 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against Siddaramaiah and others.

It is alleged that Siddaramaiah used his political influence to get compensation for 14 sites in the name of his wife B.M. Parvathi in lieu of three acres and 16 guntas of land acquired by the MUDA.

The land was originally acquired by MUDA for Rs 3.24 lakh. The compensation in the form of 14 sites at the posh Vijayanagar locality in Mysuru is worth approximately Rs 56 crore.

The ED said it has also been revealed that money was routed through a cooperative society for the purchase of property, luxury vehicles, etc., in the name of relatives of G.T. Dinesh Kumar, who was the previous commissioner of MUDA.

Further investigation is under progress.

Earlier, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had outrightly rejected the allegations of illegal allotment. His wife Parvathi had returned the allotted 14 sites to the MUDA.

(This article has been published via a syndicated feed)

Year 2025: Historic milestone for Congress, Communist Party & RSS

0
(Image Source : X)
(Image Source : X)

The year 2025 is a very important milestone for all the three all-India socio-political movements in India i.e. Congress, Communist Party and the RSS. While Congress is completing its 140 years this year, the other two of them are also completing one hundred years of their existence in the year 2025. It becomes interesting to review their status as on date in a historic perspective, preferably chronologically.

Congress was initially a brainchild of Britishers and the British government. It was founded by a British ICS officer, A.O. Hume on 28th December 1885. Its limited purpose was to create a platform for the Indians to petition the British government in India to get their issues, complaints and problems redressed at the governmental level. There was no idea of freedom from the Britishers involved at the time of its inception. Britishers perceived it as a safe valve for Indians to vent their feelings in regard to their so-called socio-political welfare. Later A.O.Hume came out in support of the idea of limited self-governance by Indians themselves. 

The first President of the Congress was an Indian from Bengal named W.C.Bonnerjee who was a London educated Barrister by profession and was also the first Indian to act as a Standing Council of the then British government. Bonnerjee presided over the first session of the Indian National Congress in 1885 in Bombay (now Mumbai). He was re-elected the President of Congress in 1992 at Allahabad (now Prayagraj). He was a close associate of Dadabhai Naroji and Badruddin Tyabji who jointly formed the Indian Parliamentary Committee in England in 1893. He ultimately went to England and settled there.

With the passage of time, the Congress evolved itself as a broader political platform and initiated raising issues pertaining to the political and socio-economic importance from an Indian point of view. The partition of Bengal on the lines of the communal divide by the British government in 1905 was vehemently opposed by the Indians and it sparked a lot of anger against the government. The Congress took a lead and channelized the anger in a coordinated manner. Thereafter, the leadership of the Congress went into the hands of Gopal Krishen Gokhale, Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Bipin Chandra Pal who raised the pitch of the Congress and converted Congress into a full fledged political party. 

Mahatma Gandhi and Jawahar Lal Nehru took over the reins of the party just before the important Nagpur session of the AICC in 1920. It was only after this session that the Congress transformed itself into a people’s movement and started talking in terms of freedom from the Britishers. The Congress decided to lead from the front and within a span of ten years it had become a big people’s movement aimed at achieving freedom from the Britishers. On the occasion of its AICC session held on the banks of the river Ravi near Lahore in 1930, the Congress declared to achieve ‘complete independence’ from the Britishers.  

In 1942, the Congress, in its session at Mumbai, gave a call for ‘Quit India’ to the British government. However, it succumbed to the demand of the Muslim League led by M.A.Jinnah, who had a tacit understanding with the Britishers, for the partition of the country on communal lines. The nation got freedom from the Britishers at a very high cost in 1947 under the leadership of the Congress and the country got divided into two new Dominions i.e. India & Pakistan.

Taking complete advantage of the freedom movement, Congress and Congressmen ruled India for a period of six decades from 1947 onwards. It was in 1977, that the Congress got uprooted from power at the centre for the first time. However, it regained power intermittently thereafter but kept on losing the ground to the opposition, especially to the BJP. The party that ruled the country for decades is as on date in the opposition at the centre continuously for the third term and barring three states in the country it is out of power in the rest of the states for a long time now. However, it is in coalition in two states as the number two or number three party in the government.

From an overwhelming 40 to 50 percent voter base at a national level, its vote percentage has declined to around 20 percent, and besides this it has a leadership crisis as well. It has transformed itself into a feudal dynastic party with a gradually decreasing voter base and mass-appeal. After 140 years of its birth, it is now in a struggle of acute existential crisis as a premier political party of the nation.

The Communist Party of India was founded on 26 December 1925 in Kanpur (UP). However, there is a dispute regarding its formation year and the CPI(M) which came into existence in 1964 after a split in CPI considers 1920 as the founding year of the communist movement in India. M.N.Roy, Ambani Mukerjee and Evelyn (Roy’s wife) are recognised as the founders of the communist movement in India. 

The communist leaders in India were guided by the ideology of Karl Marx and also overwhelmed by the 1917 Bolshevik revolution of Russia. They involved themselves in resistance against British colonisation in India and also took up issues like land reforms; also fought against caste disparities in the society. They brought in trade union activity in India and also raised issues of peasants and labourers at the national level. In 1934, the Communist Party was banned by the British administration. However, it attracted a large section of the educated youth of India into its fold. The CPI was the main opposition party in India during the 1950s and 1960s. It got divided in 1964 as a fallout of the 1962 Chinese aggression on India. 

The Communists took a severe left-liberal and the so-called secular ideological line and kept themselves away from the main socio-cultural legacy and  civilizational influences of India. The Naxalite movement also has its roots in extreme communist ideology. Then there are also a number of small communist parties in various parts of India which are a part of the Left alliance in the country. Besides the trade union activities, the communists expanded their influence in the socio-political system through their intervention in the media, educational field and the intellectual forums during the Congress rule. However, their main vote-base remained limited to a small number of states, primarily Kerala, West Bengal, Tripura, Bihar, Tamil Nadu and Punjab.

In the backdrop of the global gradual meltdown of Communism over the last two to three decades, the Communist movement in India has drastically shrunken and its vote share has also reduced considerably at an all-India level. The century-old Communist movement in India has virtually now become a regional grouping with a very poor representation in the Parliament of India. It has lost its sheen, glory, leadership and even trade union superiority that it once had acquired. It is now fighting a struggle for its own survival at both the national as well as the regional levels. 

Dr. K.B.Hedgewar, a doctor, founded the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) on 27 September 1925, the day of Vijayadashami, at Reshambagh in Nagpur (Maharashtra). He was born in the same city in 1889. Hedgewar, a strong patriot from his childhood, during his school and college days, got engaged in many anti-British activities and was also a member of the Anusheelan Samiti, a party of revolutionaries fighting against the British. He, later on, in the capacity of the Congress youth leader and a volunteer, contributed to the organisation of the AICC session in 1920 at Nagpur. Thereafter, he developed serious differences with the Congress over its support to the Khilafat movement. However, in response to the call for ‘complete independence’ by the Congress, Dr. Hedgewar went to jail in 1930.                                                          

Hedgewar believed that a handful of British and the earlier Muslim invaders were able to rule over the vast country like India only because the Hindus, the indigenous people of India, were disunited. He organised the Hindu youth under a unique format of “daily-shakhas” and imbibed in them the patriotic fervor based on the ideology of Hindutva. The network of ‘shakhas’ eventually created a huge organisation throughout the length and breadth of the country. It created a gigantic impact in almost all fields of socio-political-cultural life of the nation within a span of five decades spearheaded by the cultural icon and second chief of RSS, Guruji Golwalkar.

RSS was banned by the Congress government thrice, in 1948 (consequent upon the Gandhi murder), in 1975 (due to emergency) and in 1992 (at the time of the Babri demolition). Every time the designated courts and tribunals acquitted RSS of the charges levelled against it. Hindutva ideologue and freedom fighter Veer Savarkar had a profound impact on the RSS ideology. Due to the deep commitment, sacrifices and hard efforts of its volunteers, it emerged as the biggest socio-cultural organization in the world in less than a century with its units in over 50 countries of the world. From politics to trade unionism, education to culture, social service to economic upliftment of the society, RSS made its strong presence felt everywhere. Two Prime Ministers, Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Narendra Modi; and several CMs and Ministers belonged/belong to the RSS family.

While all the three above mentioned socio-political movements in India are celebrating their important milestones this year, the RSS remains in the lead with a clear vision, strength and hope for the nation. With its deep moral influence on the current social and political system of the nation, RSS in its 100th year brings upon itself a Himalayan responsibility to lead the nation to peace and prosperity, pride and glory with equal focus on cultural and civilizational democracy that makes it an organisation with a difference.

SC dismisses plea on Adani-Hindenburg controversy

0
(Image Source : IANS)
(Image Source : IANS)

The Supreme Court has upheld an order passed by the apex court registry in August 2024 refusing to admit a lawyer’s application seeking direction to SEBI to submit its conclusive probe report into the Adani-Hindenburg controversy.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari had moved an appeal against the order passed by the Registrar on August 5 last year.

Earlier on July 15, 2024, the top court had dismissed a review petition filed against its earlier verdict refusing to form any SIT or group of experts to conduct an investigation. After perusing the review petition, a bench, headed by then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud said that there was no error apparent on the face of the record.

“No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of,” added the Bench, also comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

In a detailed order passed on January 3, the Supreme Court had said that reports prepared by third-party organisations such as the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and Hindenburg Research cannot be regarded as “conclusive proof”.

It had said that the reliance placed by PIL litigants on newspaper articles or reports by third-party organisations “does not inspire confidence” to question the comprehensive investigation undertaken by the SEBI.

The apex court said that the facts in the case did not warrant a transfer of investigation from the SEBI and asked the market regulator to take its investigation to a logical conclusion in accordance with the law.

The SC had also cautioned against the use of unverified and unrelated material in the filing of public interest litigations (PILs), adding that pleas lacking adequate research and relying on unverified and unrelated material tend to be “counterproductive”. However, it had asked the Central government to constructively consider the suggestions made by the expert panel headed by former apex court judge Justice A.M. Sapre.

“The Government of India and SEBI will take any further actions as are necessary to strengthen the regulatory framework to protect investors and ensure the orderly functioning of the securities market,” it said. The apex court had asked SEBI and other investigative agencies of the Union government to probe into allegations of short selling resulting in loss of investors’ value.

It had noted that the SEBI has already finalised 22 out of 24 investigations relating to allegations against the Adani group of companies and in relation to the remaining two cases, the market regulator has sought information from foreign agencies and entities and will determine future course of action based on receipt of such information.

However, the Supreme Court had said that these pending investigations should be completed “expeditiously within a period of three months”.

(This article has been published via a syndicated feed)