Activists from the Hindu Seva Kendram have accused the Kerala Police’s Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) of targeting them under the pretext of a “data collection exercise.” Over the past month, they allege, ATS officers have repeatedly called, interrogated, and visited the homes and offices of their members.
The Hindu Seva Kendram, known for its community welfare initiatives, stated that these actions are unwarranted and disproportionately directed toward them. Traditionally, such data collection activities fall under the purview of the Special Branch of the police. The ATS’s involvement has raised questions about the intent behind this operation.
The activists argue that this level of scrutiny is unusual, as such information-gathering activities are typically handled by the Special Branch, not the ATS. They stated this shift raises questions about the true intent and priorities of the operation.
The Hindu Seva Kendram’s criticism extends to the broader focus of Kerala’s law enforcement. Activists point out that while the state has witnessed concerning levels of ISIS recruitment and terror training camps linked to groups like the Popular Front, the ATS has made Hindu organizations its primary target instead.
“Instead of tackling real terror threats, the ATS seems preoccupied with profiling organizations like ours,” they stated.
The operation is reportedly led by Mohammed Riji, an ATS officer whom activists allege is singularly focused on their organization. They view this as a deliberate attempt to intimidate and harass those working for the welfare of society.
In response, the Hindu Seva Kendram has urged the public to remain vigilant and called for transparency in the ATS’s actions. Activists argue this is not just a routine exercise but could be part of a larger agenda targeting Hindu organizations. “We will never back down against such targeted harassment. Stand strong, and let the truth prevail!,” the organization declared.
At the time of publication, the Kerala Police had not issued a response to these allegations. Concerns over double standards and priorities in law enforcement remain central to the ongoing debate.
