Here’s the obvious question I’m anticipating for someone like me – who poured a bucketful of acid-contempt on MeToo! Declared it a ‘woke extremist movement run by alleged women of elite western left-liberal faction, who did it to help shield Islamo-Leftist sexual predators and arrange for innocent women’s sex-trafficking to these monsters in large numbers because they treated women as commodity:
1.) ‘What are you doing if not MeToo but in reverse direction – perhaps to score right-wing political points?’
And
2.) ‘If not the principles of MeToo, then what?’
As far as ‘plausibility’ part of the equation goes, I think I explained my reasons in the last part well-enough. But I shall do so here with more vigour.
With so-many of them on actual streets, instead of hiding behind anonymity provided by internet to name-and-shame…if the latter was once believed without question, why not these in the present case, who felt suffocated and oppressed enough they came to protest on streets? Physically?
Better yet, you don’t have to be a MeToo fanatic to be sympathetic to the plight of these women.
To consider the plausibility part.
What Abrahmo-leftists shamelessly call ‘Bengal’s culture of political violence.’ (In fact these are the people who’re defaming Bengal tremendously! Worse than anything else the ‘outsider’ BJP can do!). But if that’s the ‘political culture’ there, (it certainly is the history of anti-Hindu ruling regimes in this state, if not the ‘Bengali culture.’ Because I refuse to believe my fellow Bharatiya countrymen are like vicious savages and animals in a jungle), then, how far-fetched is it to believe that that violence could casually extend to sexual violence against women?
Above all, given the shameless, Abrahmo-Leftist ‘woke feminist’ MeToo! extremist cabal that constantly hunts for men’s blood all the time, is so so damned ambivalent about this large an issue – at best! Because at its (as usual) worst, they’re fiercely and massively defending, white-washing and ‘fact-checking’ the Sandesh-Khali issue of Hindu women but in favour of their favourite Islamist henchmen of Didi, an alleged ‘woman’ who’d declared ‘Jihad’ against ‘Hindutva fascist BJP’… that alone is enough to convince me to at least take seriously what sexually assaulted women of Sandeshkhali are saying about…well, their sexual assault, of course – apart from everything else they had to suffer.
I believe them.
I’m prepared to admit that yes, some of it has the potential to be some kind of witch-hunt; genuine backlash against land-grabbing; or even plain old-politics.
But the potential for the institutionalized, State-protected (if not downright sponsored) rape and sexual-assault of Hindu women at the hands of TMC goons, especially those of Islamist variety, is equally – nay, much more plausible.
You don’t have to rely on woke extremist MeToo! Principles to sympathize with these women of Bengal.
In fact, the same reason MeToo! was a matter of grave suspicion and skepticism, could – and should – serve as a solid reason to believe persecuted women of Bengal.
Not just the rubber-band reaction of a conservative backlash (‘woke extremist believe this, so I must believe the opposite!’ – although, in a super-majority of cases, that advice turns out to be quite prudent and sensible.)
But a reasonable, preliminary assessment based on simple logic, and facts available in public domain.
Facts and the context.
None of it favours the TMC propaganda.
Especially given the post-poll violence of 2021 and how that ‘narrative’ of assault and violence against women (and even men … or even animals!) was ‘managed’ by TMC’s allies of woke-extremists and Abrahmo-Leftists Deep State, both local and global.
Whrere does CAA/NRC fits into all this?
More importantly, this problem that continues unabated? It won’t be solved… it, and many other problems our glorious eastern state of Bengal suffers, until the alleged ‘political culture of violence’ is completely eradicated from this patch of our Hindu lands. Until law and order is fully restored and separatist, illegal-alien human traffickers of islamist bangladeshi and rohingyas are fully neutralized and kicked out from the country. Especially Bengal, our border state.
Broken borders always result in violent chaos. Even world’s super-power, US of A, is utterly helpless to deal with a border-invasion of its own southern-state of Texas – And the murder, mayhem, violence, and hatred it generates among communities. It poisons the length and breadth of any nation. Not to mention the tremendous pressure on taxpayer it puts. Especially in a ‘socialist’, ‘secular’ state like ours. Where monthly pay-check and support from State is guaranteed for violence against helpless Hindus, if only you join the ranks of the ruling party and act as its street muscle. Even without that, in any statist-welfarist State, illegal aliens hijacking benefits meant for citizens = empty-treasury = low welfare overall = more crime. That much is true everywhere, Even without the highly volatile variable called ‘anti-kaffir, genocidally anti-Hindu, Jihadi-extremism of Bharatiya sub-continental variety’ thrown into the equation of violence.
To be sure, immigrants can and do enhance and contribute towards a nation’s economy. But…
1.) only those who can be integrated! And so far, there’s no evidence islamists can be integrated in a’ kaffir’ society – anywhere across the globe. Hell, 70+ years have been passed since partition, the textbook example of ‘dis-integration’ led by ‘islamist separatism’ (whose one of the main victims, incidentally, was Bengal – still is.) And yet, we still have valid uses of the utterly shameful phrases like ‘mini-pakistan’, all across the country.
and
2.) Even if we had legit cases of immigrants who can be easily integrated – like those of indic minorities persecuted in our rabidly Islamist neighbours, even if there was no-opposition from locals, they can’t contribute to economy if the whole state stands totally deindustrialized! Which, thanks to the monstrously oppressive commie/secular rule of Bengal since independence, is absolutely the case. Given the violent joke they’d made out of Rule of Law there, for nothing except shameless vote-bank politics.
CAA and NRC is a welcome 1st step in the direction of addressing this institutional problem. 1.) to secure our borders, 2.) kick Jihadi troublemakers out, and 3.) have well-integrated labour that can contribute to the economy’s rapid industrialization on the back of improved law-n-order that creates a conducive environment for businesses that generate jobs and wealth – which will solve more problems down the line related to crime…but alas, when have ‘secular’, ‘socialist’ politicians stood for solving any problem faced by Bharat? And so, in another textbook case of anti-national, ‘secular’, ‘socialist’ politics, ‘Didi’ had vowed to never let CAA/NRC be implemented in Bengal.
So… the solution is simple.
Until anti-Hindu TMC is defeated across the Bengal, and we have secure borders from Islamist countries, women’s safety cannot even begin to be addressed there.
Its really rather simple:
Defeat all ‘secular’ ‘socialist’ forces in Bengal = safe women.
That formula can even be applied to all Bharat.
We have a choice to send that message in 2-3 month’s time, in general elections.
Let’s make the most of it.
