Remember from the 1st part, what canada’s clown prince Justinder has recently said about Israel-Hamas conflict:
“Canada strongly condemns the current terrorist attacks against Israel. These acts of violence are completely unacceptable. We stand with Israel and fully support its right to defend itself. Our thoughts are with everyone affected by this. Civilian life must be protected.”
Remember also to check out the CNN opinion article that manages to mention Bharatiya government’s Head-of-State, PM Modi’s response in support and solidarity with Israel against terrorist attacks.
Now…
Let’s go a little back down the memory lane…
And remember, also, that when Pulwama suicide bombing happened 4 years ago – and then Bharat retaliated by Balakot Air-Strike, none of them, the western countries, really cared…for Pakistani terrorists or Pakistan’s sovereignty.
In fact… well let’s begin with the US, and then move down to the rest of the 5-Eyes which had come out in tacit support of canada giving safe haven to an anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat khalistani terrorist.
- United States Prsident, Donald Trump, when asked about Bharat’s Right-to-Self-Defense, said, “India is looking at something very strong. And, I mean, India just lost almost 50 people and… with an attack, so I can understand that also.”
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo categorized Bharatiya response as “Counter-Terrorism Operation.” When he talked to Pakistani FM, he said, “I also spoke to Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi to underscore the priority of de-escalating current tensions by avoiding military action, and the urgency of Pakistan taking meaningful action against terrorist groups operating on its soil.”
And his national security adviser John Bolton had on his own told reporters at a briefing that he had conveyed to his Bharatiya counterpart Ajit Doval in a phone call “that we support India’s right to self-defence”.
- Australia said, “Pakistan must take urgent and meaningful action against terrorist groups in its territory, including Jaish-e-Mohammed which has claimed responsibility for the 14 February bombing, and Lashkar-e-Taiba,”
- UK PM Theresa May said, in their House of Commons, doing both-sidism “The UK is deeply concerned about rising tensions between India and Pakistan and urgently calls for restraint on both sides to avoid further escalation. We are in regular contact with both countries, urging dialogue and diplomatic solutions to ensure regional stability,” (By the way, this is the exact same position adopted by Bharatiya Govt. about conflict in Ukraine: “dialogue” and “diplomacy”, about which UK, along with the rest of the west, keeps asking Bharat to take their side.)
- France, one of our greatest and staunch ally in the west had its heart and mind in the right place – as always (and it’s something I want to elaborate on in the next part) – when it said, “Resumption of dialogue between Islamabad-New Delhi is necessary to initiate peaceful settlement of differences. France, which stands by India in the fight against terrorism in all its forms is fully engaged in mobilising the international community to sanction terrorists responsible for this attack (Pulwama) and freezing their financing networks,” Acting spox of France’s Ministry of Europe & Foreign Affairs said.
- For EU’s part, Maja Kocijancic, European Union Spokesperson, said, “We remain in contact with both countries & what we believe is essential, is that all exercise maximum restraint and avoid further escalation of tensions.”
- Now we come to Canada. It’s hypocritical PM Justinder Trudeau, said, “This is a conflict that has potential ramifications for billions of people in the region and that’s why we’re calling for dialogue, for de-escalation.” In a 27 second clip on CBS news, not once did the Khalistani’s favourite clown mentioned the word “terrorism” anywhere.
Contrast that to not just Canada’s reaction not only on Israel-Hamas situation but also its reaction on US Drone Strike that killed Iranian General Qasim Suleimani, when he was on the way to a diplomatic meeting no less! With Iraqi government officials, where Canada ended up urging restraint and de-escalation of the tensions after assassination, (again no word for “terrorism”) but it also said it has long been concerned by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force, led by Soleimani, whose “aggressive actions have had a destabilizing effect in the region and beyond”.
However, its the hypocrisy of the Conservative Party of Canada, that we must call out here, which, on an issue of a deadly Drone Strike based on shaky footing and questionable logic in international law, welcomed Soleimani’s death and stated: “Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has long been a tool of repression and violence in Iran and across the world” while further calling Soleimani who “was at the centre of IRGC operations and bear responsibility for violence, destruction and a destabilizing influence across the Middle East.” The CPC asked the Justin Trudeau-led Liberal government to label IRGC as a terrorist organization.
(per left’s favourite Truth-has-a-left-bias wikipedia.)
Means someone who hasn’t even been declared terrorist by canadian government, conservative party had cheered for their leader’s “extra-judicial assassination” and justified it by arguing that they be declared terrorist org. now. As if its backdating a cheque to cash in on the currency called human-life.
The same conservative party which had until recently joined together with Bharatiyas over criticizing and trolling Justinder Trudeau over his own, specific brand of politics called “disastrous global diplomacy” + all around criticism on other domestic and foreign policy issues, but suddenly made a U-Turn and its leader, Pierre Poilievre, ended up saying in their House of Commons, “if the allegations are true they represent an outrageous affront to our sovereignty.”.
What about our sovereignty boss? When you stand up in support of a terrorist living happily on your soil, who is publicly plotting and threatening world’s largest democracy’s sovereignty and territorial integrity?
What about Iraqui sovernighty? In Suleimani killing?
So the canadian hypocrisy (and largely western) has a miraculous, bi-partisan consensus, when it comes to deriding problems of people from Global South.
To be sure, a day later, Polievre did make a (somewhat) reasonable turn yet again and demanded that (regretfully) Prime Minister of Canada “must come clean with all the facts. We need to know all the evidence possible so that Canadians can make judgments on that.”
And that, precisely, is the point.
The debate and narrative about prioritizing “Credible Intelligence (or hopefully Evidence)” of Bharatiya Security Services’ hand, rather than relying on “Credible Allegations”, in the killing of Khalistani Terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, before anyone from the west should say or do anything, is completely beside the point.
Suppose there does turn out to be “Credible Intelligence or even evidence” of that.
My point is: So what?
Because the real point in this whole issue is: Why is western nations keep allowing individuals and organizations designated as “terrorists” by Bharatiya governments, to freely live, move, voice, fund, propagandize, sponsor and support, these violent and secessionist anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat activities from their soil? (Because remember: most of the banned orgs under UAPA came to reside in that disgraceful list under congress regime, and especially for Khalistan issue, its specifically congress and its ‘secular’ allies, who’d been solely responsible, for not just creating the khalistani monster but designating several of these orgs as terrorist, so it’s a bi-partisan issue, propelled solely by Bhartiya national interest.)
All of the west condemns and acts against terrorism, yes? Sometimes unilaterally.
So why this … ‘discrepancy’?
If their argument is, “Oh, Hamas terrorists killed thousands – 1300 people! Even in Pulwama – your casaulties were 40+, in Mumbai 26/11, they were 160+. In all such large-scale terror atrocities, we’d stood by you! You shameless, deliberately-forgetful Hindutva fascist bigot!”
Then boss…okay, I agree with you – that you stood by us on those occassions.
But is the number of victims alone or scale of carnage “defines” whether a violent act is terrorist or not? Was several knife and ‘minor’ shooting attacks we keep hearing about happening in Europe, which were regularly declared “terrorist” in nature by respective EU countries…were they not, in fact, terrorist in nature?
If there response then is, “Um, maybe not like that, but you can’t seriuously expect us to mount a response like that – like sending a Carrier Strike Group in Bay of Bengal (this time to stop the terrorism, not enable the continuance of rape and butchering of 3 million Hindus like we did, in 1971 Bangladesh liberation war, we assure you!) – if the victims are just 1 or 2 or maybe a dozen, or if just a terror conspiracy was ‘busted’, before it could be put into action – like blowing up a (heathen) Hindu temple or killing a (heathen) Hindu priest. Do you have any sense of proportionality or not, you Hindutva fascist bigot!”
Then okay, its fair enough I guess…however…
Sending a Carrier Strike Group to help Israel, banning pro-palestine/Hamas protests, roundly condemning a massive terror attack that took 1300+ lives (yet), and the whole “societal elite” and
opinion-makers” mostly coming in support of Israel on one end of the extreme response….I get it.
But the other end, a ‘minor’ terrorist attack, or a conspiracy to commit such ‘minor’ terrorist acts – like blowing up a Hindu temple, murdering a Hindu priest, murdering several shiv-sena leaders, laundering money, peddling drugs in cross-border ops that also relies on massive-gangsterism, and all around anti-Hindu hatred…could a valid response to ‘minor’ terror charges like that be like…supporting it?
To the point, that because of one terrorist’s death – a western far-left nation is willing to risk entire diplomatic relationship and upend entire strategic Indo-Pacific calculus?
I know you can’t send an Aircraft-Carrier to bomb such terrorists or mobilize your entire (or most of the) Deep-State in support of a victim in such a ‘minor’ terrorist incidents, in a filthy, 3rd world, Global South country of brown, heathen, polytheist, idol-worshipper Hindu people…I get that. And frankly, given how many different terrorist organisations you lot had created, funded and cheered from foreign soil, which resulted in oh-so-many different kinds of terrorist attacks on regular intervals, and which, given so many massive number of kaffir/heathen/bourgeosie Hindu population in India, results in so many deaths and losses that if you started sending a warship for each such terrorist attack, the entire western Navy would’ve to anchor down around Bharatiya shores. I don’t want you to put you through such a misery.
But could you at-least not, actively support such terrorist elements living on your soil, as a response to their terrorist conspiracies targeting Bharat and Hindus?
And if the west’s collective answers then is “Oh, the people who live in the west and who have western nations’ citizenships, cannot even be terrorist – especially if they openly promote violence and secessionism against Hindus and Bharat. For us, its just ‘usual democratic principles’ at work, which we vow to defend tooth and nail, you Hindutva fascist bigot!”
Then I’ll have to say, you’ve all just monstrously betrayed Global South, yet again.
And that is the whole bloody point of the original question I asked earlier.
My argument is NOT that pakistani terrorist should be treated with the same compassion as a canadian terrorist.
Or a Hamas terrorist be allowed to carry out those monstrous acts on Israeli soil.
It’ll NEVER be.
My argument – and that of crores of not just Bharatiyas but billions across the Global South – is that a terrorist, whether a citizen of global south or “civilized” white west, whether guilty of a ‘minor’ terrorist attack or a ‘major’ one, should be eliminated anywhere he/she is. Without hesitation or mercy. At the very least, they should be deported immediately to the countries where the victims of a terrorists live(d), so they can face the law for their crimes and justice could be done.
As long as violent terrorists like Nijjar are allowed safe-haven in not just the white-west but anywhere, nobody is – or will be – safe, globally, everywhere. Just like how Canada learned (or refused to learn, unfortunately), after kanishka air bombing.
(To be continued in the next part…)
