They say, in politics, one week is a long time.
And it’s been more than one month.
Since Oct 7, 2023 massacre of Jews in Israel.
1200 dead.
The largest in their history since Holocaust.
With more than 200 still held hostage by a brutal, genocidal Jihadi terrorist organization. (Some kind of hostage swap is underway, but numbers are dismal and nothing’s certain about the future.)
And in the month that followed, the world had woken up to a level of rabid, institutionalized far-left anti-semitic hatred in reality which the left only dreamt of accusing right all over the world.
It’s frankly disgusting.
Islamo-Leftist alliance was previously dubbed a “conspiracy theory” by Orwellian American-led-globalist-left when French 1st rang the warning bells over it way back 20 years ago. In fact, truth-has-a-left-bias Wikipedia says the ponderings over the term – while not declaring certainty of its origin – do point out that 1st popular usage of it were inside a book by a French academic, for a book about, guess what? New Judeophobia.
In 2016, he said he isn’t sure whether he coined it or heard its usage, but pointed out that “Islamo-Progessives” (What a joke! Implying any progressivism to an ideology that explicitly forbids any alterations to its 1400 years old, medieval forms of practices!) and “Palestino-Progressives” were terms used by French-Leftists to describe themselves.
That book also talked about “Islamo-Fascism” by the way.
So it is no surprise at all, that disgusting American-left-led pro-terrorism Deep State, run by the likes of George Soros and Barack Obama, has come out strongest when Jews were massacred – again – in Israel itself this time.
Like twitter files, Hunter-Biden laptop, Biden family influence peddling, Russia-collusion hoax against trump, mask-mandates and covid lab-leak theory from Wuhan, this alleged “conspiracy theory” about Islamo-leftism by right too, turned out to be real. And equally deadly.
But what matters here, is that words matter.
That’s why academia is busy creating, articulating and defining their meanings.
Especially in the Abrahmo-Leftist world.
Because why not?
In the world dominated by them, their religious-cultural context is dominated by…hell, it starts! this world starts, with the ‘Word of God’; according to them.
That the world is created not by God’s hands but by His speech.
What He says, so shall it be.
In the very beginnings of the chapter literally titled The Beginning, in Bible’s 1st Book: Genesis, He says, in just the 3rd verse, “Let there be Light.” and there was light.
And of course, their Prophets are ‘God’s Word made flesh’ by God.
(An excellent article talks about it here. For the record, I’ve always scratched my head at ‘Word becoming flesh (Of prophets)’ and then the concept of ‘Eucharist’ – which stipulates that consecrated Bread and Wine at the end of Eucharist prayer is actually Body and Blood of Jesus. Which means…what? That faithful actually eat the ‘Word of God’ instead of following it? It would certainly explain the madness of christian missionaries like Stan Swamy allegedly working with Left Wing terrorists – the two of them being bitter enemies of each other through entire history.)
And given this ‘Word of God’ was revealed 1st to Jews themselves, it makes perfect sense that they pay very, very close attention to ‘words’ and their meanings.
After all, the most expansive definitions of any of the anti-ism on the earth, must of course be anti-Semitism.
Us Hindus, who’d never known it in their longest, continuous history of their homeland – which was also a welcoming home to some jews fleeing persecution for more than 2 thousand years – would be left scratching their heads or burst out in laughter, if we knew the long list of what is today called ‘Anti-Semitic tropes.’ With a ‘Dude, come on!’ incredulous, baffling expression pasted on our face, even after we did read it. Wondering how it could lead to some kind of harms to Jewish people?
Our reaction would be justifiable.
We Hindus think in different ways. And more importantly, our thinking leads to entirely different, real world behavior.
‘Words’ have different meanings to us, or at least importance.
I’m not making this up.
A 2014 study from ADL (Anti Defemation League, initially designed to protect Jewish interests, since lost its way in spectacularly disappointing woke fashion) published a study on anti-Semitism across the world.
In Bharat, it was, guess what? 20%!
And before you say, ‘Oh, it must be just the usual suspects. You know, leaders of the ones who believe in “Remove police for 15 minutes!”’ then I have news for you: Its 20% Hindus, 24% Muslims.
Which must necessarily mean that more Hindus hold anti-Semitic views than entire Muslim population in 2014’s Bharat!
Is that a joke?
But okay, let’s roll with it for a moment.
Can ADL – or anyone, list a series of hate-crimes or hate-speech against Jews by Hindus in Bharat?
Pre-2014 or even after it?
And by Hindus I don’t mean those self-hating Hindus who see nothing good in our religion, our nation, our history and our civilization, and believe in ‘sickularism’. Those who’d gladly follow our colonizers to hell, if only the western elite says ‘Chhu tommy!’ – which these days also includes biting the head off of our friends. Including Israelis.
Any Bajrang Dal, VHP types harassing any Jews anywhere? Or taking out rallies against them?
Even the ADL and the west will admit that the only incident of anti-semtism attack in Bharat was 26/11 Mumbai Terror attack, and even there, the responsibility (well, if you remove the responsibility of institutional failure by a govt. formed on ‘Muslim vote-bank’, led by a man who believed ‘Muslims have the 1st right on national resources.’) fell squarely on the Islamist Jihadi terrorists who’d come from across the borders. From Pakistan. The infamous Jihadi terror factory of the world.
So Bharatiyas had nothing to do with that.
Which begs the obvious question: In what context ‘20% Bharatiyas hold anti-Semitic views’ becomes useful information for a generalized survey by outfits like ADL,intending to inform policy decisions?
Because in that same survey, for the same year:
1. Sweden had that index rating of 4% . Its record with anti-Semitism can be read here.
2. Norway had the rating of 15%. Its record with anti-Semitism can be read here.
3. Denmark had that rating of 9%. Its record with anti-Semitism can be read here.
4. Netherlands had that rating of 5%, Its record with anti-Semitism can be read here.
Let’s leave Switzerland, because its rating was 26% and it comes with quite historical baggage of being Nazi-banking-of-choice.
These “records” contain hate-speech and other demeaning, mocking acts, as well as serious violations like setting Synagogues on fire, grave vandalism, assault, murder, anti-Jewish riots and so on, specifically because they were Jews/Jewish.
And yet…all those countries are in the very top of V-Dem’s “Varieties of democracies report for 2023.”
Denmark was no. 1, Sweden 2, Norway 3, Switzerland 4. Netherlands 15.
In that same ’thing,’ our Bharat was pushed at 97. A so-called “electoral autocracy.”
With the usual serious concern about “hindutva and hindu nationalism endangering secular democracy and minority rights.”
So how is that:
- In a so-called electoral autocracy,
- Filled with the worst enemies of monotheism: pagan, polytheist and idol-worshipers, for whom the Abrhamic God has not just permitted but commanded genocide,
- Has “only” 20% anti-Semitic views,
- Among so large a population, of 1.4 billion people
- And yet Not. A. Single. major case of anti-semitism?
How?
The results are baffling!
Which means either ADL’s ratings are worthless…
Or Hindus are, kinda, different.
Their thinking, their ‘Words’ do not actually lead to the kind of real-world ‘harm’ that’s prevalent in the rest of Abrahmo-Leftist world, where ‘Words’ are followed by the disgusting actions. Rather as a norm than exceptions. Or at least have a much larger propensity for it.
So it’s almost ironical that Jews – both secular and religious – who’d always been most liberal, progressive, tolerant and inclusive in the western societies, had previously allied with a left that’s recently (well, not recently, its like that since the time of Marx and all commie dictators who followed the murderous, genocidal left-wing ideologies) championing an idea that ‘Words are Violence!’.
For example… well, the most extreme example of it I’d come to later, but in general terms, according to this deranged left, the racist, bigoted, nasty language does equal harm to people as real violence would, which means such violence must be punished under criminal laws, which is only possible if you criminalize it.
Which means speech must be criminalized.
Okay.
But here comes the caveat. Because according to the Left, such a language can only be criminalized depending on who uses it against whom.
And it’s not just that, but even the contours of what exactly constitutes ‘racist, bigoted hate-speech’ amounting to actually ‘harm and violence’ is also, kinda, flexible. There’s no objective standard.
If a black uses the word ‘White Trash’ in full, insulting, racist fury, its perfectly understandable, since its ‘punching up.’
But God forbid (excuse the pun!) if a white person uses the ‘n’ word even as a joke!
Sounds weird?
But okay, perhaps you might think its fine and fair, but here’s the rub: Who decides which way is up and which down?
Because if you believed Isalmo-leftists, Jihadi Palestinians are punching so far up that cold-blooded murder, rape, beheadings and/or burnings of little kids in their cribs and old people in their armchairs, is all justified.
It’s still punching up.
Because it’s done to the Jews in Israel.
In fact because it’s done in Israel, it doesn’t matter if the victims also contain these deranged leftists’ own countrymen.
And hence, ‘Wordy’ celebration of it should be a no-brainer. A good Jew, is a humiliated, violated, looted and dead jew – according to them, and their Critical Race Theory and their version of Decoloniality.
Understandably – and rightly! There’s fierce pushback against such a rhetoric from those who have a … ‘Conventional’ understanding of right and wrong.
And in it, one of the most contentious and infamous slogan for debate is that of “From River To The Sea, Palestine Will Be Free!”
On the surface of it, there’s nothing inherently wrong or ominous in the slogan.
But it’s the underlying context, critics say, that’s monstrously hateful.
Why?
Because the area between said river (Jordan) and the said sea (Mediterranean Sea), includes the State of Israel.
Good old ADL has no qualms declaring it as anti-Semitic slogan because it means “the dismantling of the Jewish state. It is an antisemitic charge denying the Jewish right to self-determination, including through the removal of Jews from their ancestral homeland.”
Jews worldwide are trying to make it added to unanimously accepted anti-Semitic tropes and hate-speech.
All because of a Dog-Whistle.
Which is what it is.
It doesn’t say anything explicitly.
But ‘Kill India’ does. There’s nothing even remotely ‘ambiguous’ about it.
And yet, there’s not even a tiny bit of acknowledgment of this anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat hate slogan, across the world.
Why?
(To be continued… )
