Secular-Certified “P****stan-Zindabad”?
Secular Idea of India and its cheer-leders in modern times have no shame, formally accepting the very anti-Secular Idea of India: the two-nation theory. Which says that basing a nation on religion is indeed possible and for which partition of host country (in this case, Hindu’s homeland, Bharat) must be done. They have no trouble formally “recognizing” its practical outcome either: The sovereign, independent and Islamic State of P****stan… according it acceptance and “Secular” legitimacy from Bharat! Of all places!
A la ‘Jah simran, jah! Jee le apni zindgi…!!!’ urduwood project done on epic proportions.
DDLJ was, of course, fiction. Peak Secular fiction, you can say. “Pop-Culture icon”.
But nobody paused to ask, when the end credits rolled, what happened to the rest of the Bauji’s family, did they?
Whether they were accorded the same freedom as Simran?
The freedom to choose their fates, just after getting out of an years, even decades long shackles.
But perhaps that was the whole intention, wasn’t it?
So the peak secular fiction would match perfectly the peak secular reality.
Seculars in Bharat would not only allow, but practically worship Muslim’s religious choice, in 1947…
But they won’t award the same courtesy to Hindus.
Yes, they are free to disagree with Hindu-Rashtra, in theory. They could do it for eternity. We won’t stop them. But why wouldn’t they allow Hindus to have it in practice – if they allowed the same to its arch-nemesis, too? Indeed for Hindu’s very own homeland. No Hindu demands or even wants Saudi Arabia, or Vatican or Israel to be declared a Hindu rashtra – in fact, that’s exactly what P****stan did! Claiming a land and people in the name of a foreign faith it had no right whatsoever.
But Bharat’s immutable connection to Hindu Dharma, for thousands of years, is indisputable.
Why wouldn’t Secular Idea of India cheerleaders allow Hindus at least that much?
Especially if they’d already accepted the original sin against their secular Idea of India?
And not just accepted…
In fact, they all cheer on about everything P****stani Muslims do! And not just cheering for alleged positives but they’re ever ready to whitewash nearly all of its worst crimes – even after a partition – that has taken massive number of Hindu lives. Crimes that are aimed to gobble up even more of our territory in Kashmir. Through heinous Jihadi terrorism. They’ve tried their level best to downplay and erase the only ethnic cleansing in Bharat post 1947 – that of Hindu Kashmiri Pundits – which was carried out by Jihadi islamist terrorists, at the behest of P****stan.
But that pro-P****stani stand – despite violent Jihadi-terrorism sponsored by it – is hardly limited to Kashmir.
In 1992 Mumbai serial bomb-blasts, that are inevitably linked to P****stan, Pawar saheb invented a whole new one… to blame Hindus!
In 26/11, that was proven to be a handiwork of P****stani ISI, diggi raja, degenerate bhatt and some other anti-Hindu traitor invented a whole new conspiracy theory to blame Bharatiya RSS … instead of P****stan.
Most recently, in 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing – and the subsequent Balakot Air-Strike – despite being proven, once again, that it was P****stan’s anti-Hindu handiwork, they keep spreading the conspiracy theories that it was Bharat and Bharatiya government’s fault and indeed, deliberate intention, to get its soldiers killed! Not only that, even if it was, they kept doubting the valor of our armed forces, asking for “proof” whether the Air-Strike really did happen and a pilot having the same name as me, actually shot down an American made P****stani F-16?
And these days…there’s something even worse and sinister afoot.
Because why would the self-proclaimed ‘independence struggle monopolist’ and the frontrunner for creating ‘Secular Idea of India’, the congress party, in its rallies and public meetings – whether alone or with its so-called allies gratuitously calling itself I.N.D.I.A. bloc (attempting yet another monopolistic maneuver), regularly entertain even more separatist rhetoric?
Indeed, the worst of all: Why would ‘Seculars’ – who want, above all else, to preserve their ‘Secular Idea of India’ – have such disconcertingly alarming rise in incidents where Muslims among them end-up chanting ‘P****stan Zindabad!’
The very anathema to ‘Secular Idea of India?’
And perhaps what should be a moment of alarming national shame, we have got ourselves a bone-chilling reminder, not even before a year has passed in full, since Congress returned to power in Karnataka with a thumping majority (also with allegations of suspicious quid-pro-quos with foreign forces and banned terrorist organizations like PFI)… a disgustingly traitorous, and rather shameless, brazen display of anti-National behavior:
During the Rajya-Sabha elections, when congress had fielded a ‘Muslim candidate’ from Karantaka, who easily cruised to victory too, but after which, some of his ‘Muslim’ supporters shouted, in full public-view, right in the bloody assembly that’s supposed to be a symbol for democracy and secularism; a place for representing the entire state, this heinous slogan:
“P****stan Zindabad!”
It was, to be absolutely soft and mild, an utterly damning indictment for ‘Secular Idea of India’ and its various torch-bearers and cheer-leaders. If anything, to truly explore the devastating symbolism, the depth of treachery, we’ll need perhaps a whole set of other articles. But those are for later.
Right now, suffice it say that the reaction of secular Abrahmo-Leftists post-debacle, is actually quite revealing.
First, they tried to deny it even happened! Which is, actually – and rather bafflingly, a norm, rather than exception. Where self-proclaimed fact-checkers themselves, without caring a shred for their already shredded credibility, peddle blatant lies and propaganda.
Aided and abetted, of course, this time, by the official Karnataka government authorities headed by congress party.
Leading to unforgivable delays and needless confusion.
There was a grand tamasha of ‘Forensic Testing’ when it was abundantly clear what kind of poison was being spoken.
When even FSL report came out, confirming what everyone knew all along… that those heinous, anti-National slogans of P****stan Zindabad were indeed raised in the hallowed chamber of the state-assembly by some ‘Muslim’ supporters of a ‘Muslim’ congress candidate for Rajya-Sabha… well, that was exactly when the real shamelessness and brazenness about congress party’s pro-P****stani stand started coming out, didn’t it?
Congress MLA B K Hari-Prasad said, “If at all the BJP feels that Pakistan is an enemy state, the central government should ban all the trade and they should declare Pak an enemy state. Until and unless they declare Pak an enemy state we can’t call them enemy state. So they are our neighbour.”
The day I first read it, I stared at it for a moment, and then read it again!
The letter didn’t arrange themselves, flying all across the screen, into: “This disgusting betrayal to Secular Idea of India – that too, in the temple of Secular democracy – will be met with full force of all Secular forcces who oppose everything P****stan is and represents!”
Nope. The headline didn’t change.
In fact, the MLA doubled down on it, and brazened it out, stood by his statement when nationalist voices called him out for it, and he threatened the press with ‘privilege motion’ if they added ‘masala’ to his statement.
Trust me, given the fact that he’d essentially Halal-ed the Secular Idea of India in broad-daylight and made a burning biryani out of it in an anti-national frying pan all by himself, the press certainly didn’t need to add any ‘masala’ to this burnt up crisp…
but so much for democracy and freedom-of-the-press the I.N.D.I.A. bloc keeps screaming about anyway.
More importantly, I stared in disbelief at it, wondering whether he knows not the extremely dangerous import of his words – especially about a heinous incident that happened right in the assembly of our people. Which is supposed to be ‘representative body’ of the state. Much more so for the irreparable damage it does to his own party’s much vaunted claims to ‘Secular Idea of India.’
Your party and its so-called ‘intellectuals’ – both official and those darbari media on the payroll – keep bandying about how ‘the Secular Idea of India is explicitly in opposition to P****stani Idea of Two-Nation theory!’ Right? They regularly cite that theoretical position not just in social spheres but spend considerably large time about its influence in governance and constitutional principles and methods. And Bharat being a democracy, that governing power is inevitably concentrated and symbolized by representative bodies. State assemblies or Parliament, being the most visible and obvious symbols.
Shouting here, of all places, ‘P****stani Zindabad!’ should be the highest form of betrayal a Secular – especially a congressi Secular, can commit against their much beloved ‘Secular Idea of India.’
That treachery demanded the fiercest possible condemnation and harshest possible action by congress leadership and indeed, the whole organization.
But what do we get?
Congressi leaders – an elected representative, no less – is brazenly defending such treasonous display of anti-national behavior – with national leadership brushing it all off casually, like it doesn’t even matter. A behavior, that is also, as far as logic is concerned, totally against congress’s own professed principles and values.
About ‘Secular Idea of India.’
…Unless it wasn’t.
Unless the MLA was articulating exactly the kind of political position of congress (and indeed, all secular, Abrahmo-Leftist defenders of ‘Secular Idea of India’) we’re talking about here.
- They’re okay with lots of pre-existing christian and muslim nations.
- They’re okay with all Abrahmic religions having a policy of must-dedicate-the-nation-to-this-Abrahmic-religion wherever all 3’s holiest sites happened to be in.
- They’re even okay with accepting a treacherous 2-nation-theory resulting in partition of our Bharat on religious lines and then, formally “recognizing” this new jihadi separatist country P****stan’s claim to our territories, in the name of their alien faith that never had any intrinsic claim to those lands.
- Even after that, they keep cheering for this separatist country, its culture and its people. Never questioning or resisting its “Idea of P****stan.” (Bangladesh doesn’t count, because it didn’t re-join Bharat.) And these days, they cheer for it, even in the state assembly – literally! And when outraged people demand explanation, their “elected” leaders brazen it out with more gaslighting and defiance. So basically, in everything, they agree with P****stan.
- But its only Hindus, who MUST NOT, AT ALL COSTS, BE ALLOWED ANY OF THE SIMILAR COURTESIES FOR THEIR DHARMA AND THEIR HOMELAND. Despite being the 3rd largest in the world and one of the most tolerant, HINDU DHARMA MUST REMAIN A STATELESS REFUGEE IN THE COUNTRY OF ITS ORIGIN.
- And all this, purely because of the opposition from 2 Abrahmic proselytizing minority religions – that are actually top 2 majority in the world and constitute the 2 most powerful religious blocs. Indeed, these 2 are the same ones who had colonized Bharat for 1,200 years. Committed untold atrocities against Hindus. And are solely responsible for partition in the 1st place. No other minority – Jains, Buddishts, Parsis, Jews, Sikhs, have such fierce, institutionalized opposition and hatred to Hindus’ efforts to reclaim their country. And these are even smaller micro-minorities. Indigenous. If anybody really needs protection from some kind of ‘majoritarianism’, its them. But they’re absolutely fine! But alas…Seculars and Abrahmo-Leftists have always sided with foreign colonizers’ extremely powerful remaining minorities and their anti-Hindu strategtems and scheming.
That’s the ‘Secular Idea of India.’
Any right thinking person, anyone having a shred of honesty and thinnest possible idea about fairness in their hearts, would be able to identify the grossly unfair, completely unprincipled, patently hypocritical, and indeed, downright malicious bigotry institutionalized against Hindus here.
For decades.
I have grave doubts that even the highly-revered, OG ‘Secular Idea of India’ designers had envisioned this kind of extremist framing of it, which their ideological descendants had weaponized today against Hindus like weapons-grade U-235 to nuke-out core Hindu concerns. After all, formal inclusion of Secularism was explicitly debated and ultimately, rejected, in constituent assembly debates. Yes, the argument of malicious intention behind it can be debated: of allowing State’s MASSIVE interference in ONLY Hindu religious affairs – which otherwise wouldn’t have been possible if Secularism had been formally included and defined in some kind of non-hypocritical manner in the constitution. Nevertheless, the fact remains: The original copies of constitution had Bhagwan Shri-Ram’s figures on it. The directive principles were very clear about stopping cow-slaughter. Everyone knows the story of Somnath temple, too. And how can we forget about the famed “Sengol”, the actual religious ceremony of official transfer of power from colonizer christian British, to Hindus.
Oh wait!
We actually did!
Thanks to Marxist historians.
And “Secular Super-hero” Nehru left such a crucially important symbol of our nation’s “founding”, to rot in a dust in a Museum. Allegedly used it as walking-stick!
But no-one can ask dead-people what they meant or didn’t mean now.
We can only deal with effective bottom-line.
And it’s been transparently anti-Hindu. Since 1947.
And it needs to be called out and questions must be asked to those who had lied to us and put a whole lot of Secular wool over our Bharatiya eyes.
(To be continued…)
