More than 1 event of tremendous proportions had happened last month, and I’m surprised no-one covered them, especially our pro-Hindu, pro-Nationalist media.
So I guess it’s up to me to illuminate on both.
Here, in this piece, I’ll be covering the 1st.
The 1st of them I saw on Partition Horrors Remembrance Day, 14th august, incidentally on The New Yorker – a far-left propaganda magazine.
It’s titled, ‘Is the FBI truly biased against Trump?’
It’s a long piece, pontificating about the tantalizing testimony of a frustrated FBI Special Agent-turned-Whistleblower who was later identified as one Jonathan C. Buma. Working out of FBI’s Los Angeles Office, and who claims to “have worked at HQ level” and “managed only the second largest source program in the Bureau.”
It’s full of exciting intrigues and intelligence jargon, not to mention the explosive mix of politics and espionage. In short, the usual treachery and cover-up prevalent in the vicious and decadent Abrhamic world, which a Spy-Thriller writer like me would hungrily lap up with both hands.
(The actual testimony can be read here.)
At the heart of this story is a highly credible Ukrainian source, code-named DYNAMO. And his two Sub-sources codenamed ROLLIE and the other, funnily enough, THE ECONMIST. (Which turned out to be plain uninspiring.)
Background
DYNAMO was a man from ukrainian diaspora, living in US. ROLLIE was an ex-KGB guy who’d later worked in Ukrainian SBU and then made a successful career in real-estate. Apart from which he ran an “anti-corruption foundation”, whose stated purpose was to “promote rule of law in society and hold criminal oligarch’s accountable for pilfering Ukrainian State funds.” In that capacity, he ‘maintained’ many high-level Ukrainian govt. associates, including active SBU agents, high-ranking prosecutors in Ukrainain Prosecutor General’s Office, Current and former parliament members, former prime-ministers and retired generals. (So the next time you come across a “foundation” supported by west promoting “rule of law or accountability” in bharat, you know it’s run by treacherous snakes working for western intelligence, selling out your country for few nickels and pat on the back by Abrahmic anti-Hindu haters. Because they’d have compromised the very top of government and would be nicely ‘maintaining’ them.)
So, THE ECONOMIST…Now this guy was a highly-educated academic who worked at this foundation, with his expertise in international business and economics. Previously he’d worked in Ukranian Prosecutor General’s office itself, as a financial consultant. ROLLIE had hired THE ECONOMIST ‘to research and describe the most prolific and problematic schemes negativvely impacting Ukraine’ (another lesson for you: #1. Spies are not always James Bond types. ‘Academics, Researchers, Journalists and Activists’ could be even bigger and more dangerous spies. #2 When the far-left cries about ‘Academic Freedom’, they’re actually peddling a cover-story for their ‘Freedom to Betray and Spy on Bharat for their foreign masters.’)
Now, Agent Buma doesn’t tell us when did he recruit these people. But he’s free to tell us that these schemes that ROLLIE and THE ECONOMIST were about to report, had been long-standing, ongoing and had been running since 2014, when pro-russian president Viktor Yanukovich was in power.
The Secret Meeting
In January 2019, DYNAMO arranged for ROLLIE and THE ECONOMIST to come to the US attorney’s office in downtown Los Angeles where they presented ‘several’ of these schemes designed for large scale international money-laundering and embezzlement of State funds by Ukrainian officials through abuse of their positions in violation of US law called Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, to an Assistant US Attorney who was interested in pursuing money-laundering schemes that implicated US entities and persons. What the sources detailed was worth ‘multi-million’ and even ‘multi-billion dollars of’ schemes.
It was primarily THE ECONOMIST’S show. He’d prepared a presentation for US Attorneys. The information he presented was, according to Agent Buma, ‘based on extrapolation of open source information in Ukraine, as well as THE ECONOMIST’S consulting work in Ukrainian prosecutor’s office and ROLLIE’s foundation.’
This is the 12th para of Agent Buma’s testimony, which runs up to some 43 paras. in total.
And we don’t know what other money-laundering schemes THE ECONOMIST detailed on in this Jan 2019 meeting, except the two which Agent Buma chooses to mention, at least in this one para.
1 of those says, and I quote:
“Another scenarios alleged the billionaire George Sorors was involved in massive money-laundering.”
Readers might’ve an idle curiosity about what the half-sentence before the underlined one is referring to? Trust me, it’s a valid one but just for a moment, let me try to redirect your focus on the small, 2-words phrase that came after the underlined bit. And what it lead to in the oblivion beyond the screenshot.
The Doubt on Credibility
Here, Mr. Buma says, just after the source accused George Soros of MASSIVE money-laundering, that he recalled having a discussion with his co-handler of DYNAMO, in which he expressed “skepticism of ROLLIE’s motivation.” Because the scenarios described to him by THE ECONOMIST only targeted businessmen and politicians who were political rivals to him.
And thus great Mr. Buma goes to some length to express his fealty to the recent Democratic far-left religious doctrine called “Russia Collusion.” Meaning, that the information provided might be for damaging political opposition hostile to RIS (which according to him meant ‘Russuian Intelligence Services), rather than law-enforcement. He goes on to give a general overview of ‘Russian Disinformation generated from former Soviet Republics’ and especially in case of Ukraine, how it should – and was – treated with especial skepticism in US Intelligence Community. He justifies it further by Robert Mulller’s witch-hunt against Donald Trump and how RIS had meddled in US elections in favor of him (with the far-left liberal Deep State supposing there was a quid-pro-quo between Trump and Putin in this regard, and which ultimately proved to be a pure lie and a smear campaign .)
In any case, THE ECONOMIST had, after his presentation finished, provided Mr. Buma with a thumb drive with ‘some supporting documentation’ which he couldn’t read because much of it was in Ukranian.
Ah, how convenient!
You cast doubt on your own, specific sources based on generalized skeptical derision towards information coming from ukraine, and when the source provides ‘additional, supporting documentary evidence’, you have no reason to change your opinion because you couldn’t read it! Yes, Riiiight.
We’ll come back to this part later, but right now, we must leave it here with the boast of professional integrity of Mr. BBuma who’s patting his own back by saying, he took the information very seriously and submitted it to appropriate case file in which these considerations were memorialized. Whatever that means. I’m assuming ‘these considerations’ means ‘far-left religion of calling anything derogatory as Russian Disinformation! – If it targets their far-left degenerate heroes and fallen icons.)
Oh, and by the way, this is the only place Mr. Buma mentions stuff about George Soros in all his testimony.
The 2nd coming.
Now, in light of Mr. Buma’s immediate and strong declaration of skepticism regarding credibility of ROLLIE and THE ECONOMIST, it is here we must turn our attention to the half-finished sentence before the underlined part about George Soros.
Because it was the 2nd thing Mr. Buma referred to in his testimony, that happened in this January 2019 meeting.
Now, given what we now know about Hunter Biden’s shady life – not just shady business-deals but the the very life-style – through his abandoned laptop, and IRS whistleblower’s testimonies, not to mention the dramatic and colossal collapse of his plea deal in a delaware court – where a brave Judge refused to shut her eyes to the sheer unprecedented-ness of it (giving him impunity to any and all crimes he might’ve committed through the entire period of 2014-19), refused to be a mere rubber-stamp and asked whether FARA charges (related to illegal lobbying in US) might be brought against the defendant Hunter Biden in future – now, it’s pretty certain that the DYNAMO’S sub-sources ROLLIE and THE ECONOMIST were dot on the mark about their ‘scenario’ of Hunter Biden being engaged in unreported lobbying and/or tax evasion.
And I’d urge everyone here to pause a moment kyuki aap chronology samajhiye.
Mr. Buma says the information provided by THE ECONOMIST was ‘extrapolation of the open source information in ukraine and THE ECONOMIST’s work in ukrainian prosecutor general’s office and later at ROLLIE’S foundation.’
But Hunter Biden dropped his Macbook to John Paul Mac Issac’s computer repair store in April 2019.
According to Mr. Buma’s own testimony, the meeting arranged by DYNAMO with his sub-sources ROLLIE and ECONOMIST happened in January-2019.
It predates Hunter’s own stupidity by at least 3 months!
So even without the extremely damaging laptop, THE ECONOMIST’s ‘extrapolation scenario’s’ based on ‘his academic research’ , were rock solid on their own!
If anything, Hunter’s Laptop only served as a corroboration of the intelligence provided by DYNAMO and his sub-sources.
More confirmation, more bias.
More than anything, according to the terms of collapsed plea-deal, Hunter-Biden himself was ready to plead guilty to 2 counts of misdemeanors related to tax evasion.
Guilty.
There. From the horse’s mouth itself. About at least that much.
What more confirmation do you need about the credibility of the nature of DYNAMO’s sub-sources’ reporting regarding Hunter?
But Mr. Buma already colored his judgement about the whole affair that the information provided was for ‘politcal influence’, rather than ‘law-enforcement’ because it targeted his favourite Sleepy Joe Biden. At least he has the shame to admit in his testimony that he later learned from media that at least ‘some’ of those allegations had turned out to be true. He didn’t outright call them Russian Disinformation, again and still. (Like some of his peers in USIC and far-left media and their blind followers are doing).
Let’s also keep in mind that Mr. Buma never says in his testimony, not even once, that the information provided by DYNAMO’s sub-sources was actually investigated and proved to be wrong. No. He just dismisses them out of hand based on the reasoning that since it was for ‘political influence’ hence it cannot be for ‘law-enforcement’.
That’s textbook rigid Abrahamic binary world-view operating at its stupid best.
No consideration given to the thought that ‘even if it was for political influence, might it also be true and hence a case fit for law-enforcement?’
How is corruption allegation against politicians different than it is for ordinary citizens, if the arrogant west claims to stand for ‘Rule of Law’, whose one of the central pillars is ‘Equality before the Law.’ And how ironical it was for ROLLIE who ran a foundation in Ukraine promoting exactly that,“Rule of Law.”
By the way, Mr. Buma informs us that when DYNAMO’s sub-sources told him about Burisma and he submitted them on the case-file, he was contacted by 2 FBI agents from Delaware office who were investigating Hunter for ‘Prostitution and Drugs’, not even money-laundering. So when Republican firebrand leader Marjorie Taylor Green flashed those… ‘unsvaory pictures’ of him in the US House of Representatives arguing for his potential to be charged for prostitution, and for which she was viciously attacked by western Deep State and its far-left media, she had a legitimate reason to raise the point, because FBI was also thinking in that direction.
The ultimate point is:
If source DYNAMO and his sub-sources ROLLIE and THE ECONOMIST … if they were right about Hunter Biden, wouldn’t it stand to reason that they were perhaps equally right about George Soros’s MASSIVE money-laundering in Ukraine?
Why did Jonathan C. Buma dismissed it out of hand and didn’t deem it worthy to even mention it another time in his testimony (like he did with at least Hunter), let alone investigating it further?
Okay, Bidens were directly involved in active politics and Joe was actually candidate of Democratic party, so maybe Buma and his colleagues had grounds (however specious and flimsy) to ignore DYNAMO’s intelligence on Hunter as ‘influence operation.’
What grounds there were or are, to disregard THE ECONOMIST’S presentation warning about MASSIVE money laundering by George Soros in Ukraine? He’s a ‘private citizen.’ Right? Just like Barack Obama is, when he speaks about balkanizing Bharat. So what prevented Mr. Buma or indeed the FBI and IRS to investigate Soros for money-laundering?
The Plot Twist
What could be the plot-twist here? The biggest and yet most unremarkable one in this tale is quintessential western far-left Deep State’s hypocrisy.
Because FBI Special Agent Jonathan C Buma doubts the credibility of DYNAMO and his sub-sources, ROLLIE and THE ECONOMIST, only and only here. When it comes to their intelligence against Hunter-Biden or even worse, against George Soros.
In the rest of his testimony, he fiercely defends his Ukrainian source DYNAMO’s credibility to the hilt! In fact, the WHOLE testimony is about defending DYNAMO and his work with this Ukrainian. He gives many examples of how his intelligence proved useful for serving American national interests, both foreign and domestic. And led to securing convictions in courts and formulating important foreign policy decisions abroad. All with DYNAMO’S help.
In fact, this testimony is used by him and far-left Deep State and their pet mainstream media to peddle the narrative that since DYNAMO provided derogatory information about Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, FBI suppressed the investigation and punished Jonathan C. Buma and cut off DYNAMO. Ordered ceasing all contact. Because his bosses accused DYNAMOs credibility as suspect.
That’s why he defends his convictions. Much, much more fiercely.
To be continued…
