Finally, Canada and the wider US-led-west keeps screaming about “Rules-based-order”, “Rule-of-law” etc.

We in the Global South know how that works.

The way canada handled Kanishka Air bombing, completely ignoring our and their own intelligence inputs because it concerned matters of not Canadian citizens but brown South Asians, we all saw that – and remember. It was deemed completely an “Indian problem”.

Canada had refused chief accused Parmar’s extradition request to Bharat in 1982.

Even after the bombing happened, remaining the worst case of flying terrorism before 9/11, even after that, there wasn’t any “justice”. The inquiry would only begin 2 decades later after much pressure and finished in 2010. Holding only 1 person guilty. The one who was already dead. 8 others out of total 9 were let go. And why? Because the 150 hours long surveillance tape-recordings of the perpetrators planning the anti-Hindu terrorist acts, those kind of intercepted communications  – the same things Canada is screaming to have possessed which allegedly implicates Bharatiya intelligence in the case of Nijjar – the alleged khalistani mole of Canadian CSIS silently destroyed those records, in the case of investigation against khalistani terrorists from Kanishka bombing.

So if US-led-west and its ideological attack dog like Canada wants Bharat to “cooperate” with the probe, then perhaps its time we show them the famous punctuality of Bharatiya Justice system. Perhaps the khalistani terrorists’ elimination should be handled at the pace of Ram Mandir dispute. And I’m not talking about post 1947. I’m talking about the original one. And for the legal perspective, the one which began almost 150 years ago and continued under 3 different kinds of rules over Bharat: Islamist Mughal, Crusader British and Secular Bharat.

I’m sure even that would be better than how Canadian “Rule-of-Law” has historically treated anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat terrorist acts.

And at last, as far as “Rules Based order” – and exposing west’s commitment to it being equally sincere when its been accused of violating Global South’s interests – is concerned, perhaps nothing could demonstrate its blatant anti-Global South hypocrisy than the recently concluded New Delhi G20 Summit.

When the whole UN is paralysed due to security council veto institution and Ukraine has hogged and captured complete and total attention of the west, side-lining all major and desperate issues faced by Global South (many of which are of west’s own making across centuries). In this scenario, only Delhi G20 achieved a monumental feat of achieving some kind of consensus on an international forum. Not only that, Bharat went beyond and ensured the inclusion of west’s one of the most exploited continent: Africa, into the G20. Bharat made sure that Africans would have a voice on world’s most significant economic (at least primarily economic) grouping.

Bharat also made sure that the G20 agenda remains balanced and Ukraine shouldn’t be allowed to hijack yet another diplomatic gathering, serving as convenient excuse for the western countries to avoid taking responsibility or even discussing issues that most concerned Global South.

It happened in this G20, where western leaders were hailing themselves for finally looking at “world’s problems as their own problems”, to paraphrase our eminent foreign minister S. Jaishankar.

But in this same G20 summit, the western nations were busy privately raising “issue of a khalistani activist’s murder supposedly by Bharatiya intelligence” doing that age-old discrimination of “terrorist is who WE the enlightened west say is terrorist, but everyone YOU, the filthy Global South accuse of being a terrorist, is an “activist” and “dissident.” And they were doing it on a Head-of-State level, if media reporting is to believed, conveying the “issue” with the leader of the host country that has tried to act as a bridge between developed and developing countries of the Global South.

In this G20 summit, Canadian PM trudeau seemed to be here (and even before he came here) only and only to raise his support for Khalistani terrorists – and in fact, for just one of them, he was willing to castigate Bharat from the stage of Canadian parliament and sought support of his western allies to condemn a Global South democratic leader country that was the worst victim of western colonialism and terrorism assisted by it.

All this, to provide well-coordinated western political, financial, diplomatic and covert support to Khalistani terrorists… when in New Delhi G20 summit declaration – which was hailed the world over by all participants, observers and other countries for achieving consensus and when western disdain for Global South’s existential concerns was so high its entrenched extremist position on White Ukraine had sabotaged all previous meetings below head-of-state levels, where there couldn’t be a consensus and we had to be satisfied with an outcome and summery statement.

Even there, Canada had already hinted its dissatisfaction with G20 document, saying we would have used more strong language against Russia if it was up to us. (And thank God it wasn’t!) Telling us all where (at least partial) reason for their collective western angry backlash lies, when punishing Bharat for a successful G20.

The west’s blatant hatred and outrageous hypocrisy for the Global South is laid bare, when you look at the G20 document – on which they all agreed – and then further look at their actual actions.

Specifically, for the current Indo-Canada diplomatic crisis over a khalistani terrorist in which US-led-west had chosen to side with canada – and other anti-Bharat terrorists – who openly threaten Bharat’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, I’d like you all to take a stroll through the G20 leaders declaration, specifically section I, points 72 to 74 under it, which says and I quote:

• We condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including those on the basis of xenophobia, racism and other forms of intolerance, or in the name of religion or belief, recognizing the commitment of all religions to peace. It constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security.
• We strongly condemn all terrorist acts against critical infrastructure, including critical energy facilities, and against other vulnerable targets. All acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, wherever, whenever and by whomsoever committed. Effective counterterrorism measures, support for the victims of terrorism and the protection of human rights are not conflicting goals, but complementary and mutually reinforcing. A holistic approach on the basis of international law can effectively counter terrorism. Efforts to increase the effectiveness of international cooperation should be strengthened to deny terrorist groups safe haven, freedom of operations, movement and recruitment, as well as financial, material or political support.
• We also express concern about illicit trafficking and diversion of small arms and light weapons. International cooperation among States is critical to combat these phenomena, including export, import controls, and tracing.
• We commit to supporting the increasing resource needs of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and FATF Style Regional Bodies and encourage others to do the same, including for the next round of mutual evaluations. We remain committed to the timely and global implementation of the revised FATF Standards on the transparency of beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements to make it more difficult for criminals to hide and launder ill-gotten gains. We welcome the ongoing work of the FATF to enhance global efforts to recover criminal proceeds, in particular, the progress made by the FATF towards revising its standards on asset recovery and reinforcing global asset recovery networks. We reiterate the importance of countries developing and implementing effective regulatory and supervisory frameworks to mitigate risks associated with virtual assets in line with FATF Standards, especially for terrorism financing, money laundering, and proliferation financing risks. In this regard, we support the FATF’s initiative to accelerate the global implementation of its standards, including the “travel rule”, and its work on risks of emerging technologies and innovations, including decentralised finance (DeFi) arrangements and peer-to-peer transactions.

While all points are valid, the bold points rankled especially hard in case of Canada and the west.

Because what else can it be called, except west’s explicit refusal to agree with the notion that “all terrorism is a crime against humanity.”

And Khalistani terrorism is based on xenophobia, racism, intolerance of another religions and beliefs. Not one western Deep State propaganda outlet points to the fact when they refer to the issue as “Khalistani deamnd for an independent Sikh Homeland” that it’s NOT going to be a democracy. It’s going to become a militant religious khalistani theocracy.

What else is the west doing, if NOT providing khalistani terrorists (plus all other sorts of Islamist, left wing etc.) the safe haven, freedom of operations, movement and recruitment, as well as financial, material or political support?

By adopting reproachful and hostile stance against Bharat for its right to self defense, and safeguarding of its territorial integrity and sovereignty from terrorists based on foreign soil? By initiating a full scale diplomatic crisis going all the way upto Head-of-State levels, In favor of an anti-Hindu anti-Bharat terrorist?

By asking (in almost threatening language) for Bharat to “cooperate” with Canada on the “murder” of a “Canadian” “sikh activist”, so that “perpetrators” can be brought to “justice”; instead of all of them – including the 5-eyes intelligence grouping – cooperating with Bharat to hand over all the khalistani terrorists provided safe haven in western countries, who’re accused of decades long conspiracy of sedition, terrorism, money laundering, narco smuggling and all around anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat hate-speech. So that they can be held accountable to Bharatiya law, where biggest victims of such terrorism live… so that terrorists and their allies can all be brought to Justice.

What is that, if not a most treasonous backstabbing of the Delhi G20’s spirit, which was hailed as a beacon of hope for Global South finally getting a measure of equality, dignity and respect? Where it was assumed that their voice and their concern matter?

If the running argument about it is “but oh, you Bharatiyas, you didn’t come out and condemn Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, and in fact dialled down the language against Russian aggression in Delhi G20, than the one used in Bali G20 an year before. Remember? In fact, you people, all of you are not a people believing in Rule-of-Law, you dirty brown, black savages!”

Then, there’s not one but several counter arguments against it…

1. Complete lack of nuance on the part of western imperialists and their propaganda, ignoring their own responsibility in provoking the conflict.
2. Even if the 1^st point is ignored, then why did you, the extremist defenders of democracy worldwide and ever more viciously and violently forceful in imposing your version of it everywhere, signed on to such an agreement? Why did you, western zealots of Ukrainian cause agree to such a declaration? If your alleged “values” matter so much to you, then you could’ve been honest about it and you could’ve screamed, from the stage of Delhi G20 that ‘Listen, you dirty unwashed brown, black savages! Nothing else matters to us except white European ukraine, ukraine and ukraine . You unwashed masses, you live on our mercy! And we will absolutely not give a flying <insert the unsavory word here>for any of your concern, EVER. You, on the other hand, you lot better get in line or else, western Universal values of democracy is coming to get you! And no, that does NOT mean you doing everything as we do – like invading countries at will, and supporting extremist and terrorist movements, sponsoring coups and authorizing assassinations, and then invading them again for eliminating such terrorism! Only WE, the civilized democratic west can do that – because we’re God manifested on earth! Only our will and order matters! You can all be damned! And if you don’t listen, then be prepared for declaration of a ‘democratic backsliding’ crisis in your country based on what people trained and loyal to our dark arts of judging others say! And then be prepared to have it followed by ‘speaking truth to power’ , which then translates to ‘responsibility to protect’. Which then means invading or occupying your country because you’re most definitely making WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! So we’ll sanction you so that your population and people can suffer, even after invading you!

Be prepared!

They could’ve said. But they didn’t. Which means either they were lying about their agreement to a historical G20 summit championing the issues of global south before, or perhaps they’re lying now.

Which brings us to the next point.

• According to the west, Bharat is a Nazi State and we Hindus are Nazis. In fact, Bharat is the most anti-semitic nation in the world. Why? See that Swastika in all Hindus’ homes? (Even if it was canada who has a history of giving refuge to foreign Nazis and recently allowed an standing ovation to be given to an 98 year old Ukranian Nazi who’d fought in 14^th grenadier galicia Nazi waffen SS division. The same parliament where Trudeau had accused Bharat for carrying out a khalistani’s asasination with nothing but “credible allegations.”)

But okay. We get it. We Hindus are all Nazis, with imminent Muslim-Christian-Dalit genocide just around the corner for last… um, 9 years, is it? But yeah, its damned imminent! – according to them, which I assume, is again based on “credible allegations.”

That’s who we are – according to them: The extremist defenders of democracy worldwide.

But they aren’t, right?

According to themselves.

Hence, even if we are not upholding our end of the bargain when it comes to “rules based international order”, by refusing to condemn Russia-and-all in the Delhi G20 declaration, that’s kinda expected from us. Right?

But you, the white, privileged western extremist democrats, you’re hell-bent on preserving those rules in this “Rules-based-international-order”, right? For you, international agreements and laws are all that matter.

If a party agreed to a written word or a declaration or a treaty, then its natural for you to expect them abiding by it under its overruled by the same lawful process, correct?

Then why did you lot, having agreed to the Section I,  point no, 72 to 74 of Delhi G20’s leaders declaration, that deals with terrorism, straight up betrayed it in the most blatant terms possible, when it comes to khalistani terrorists given safe haven on your soil?

Why are you asking, insisting, pressuring Bharat to “cooperate” with nazi sheltering Canada’s probe in a “Sikh Activist” and “dissident’s” “murder” so that “perpetrators” can be “brought to justice”; instead of you lot, the entire white west, beginning your much belated “co-operation” with Bharat’s decades long requests to handover all dreaded violent khalistani terrorists, mobsters and gangsters, who are provided safe-haven on your soil, to Bharat, so that “terrorists can be brought to justice” in a country where its victims actually live?

Canada too signed on to that G20 leaders’ declaration, right?

Why isn’t the white west starts asking Canada – and the rest of the so-called 5-Eyes Intelligence grouping, to open their voluntarily blinded eyes to the scourge of Khalistani terrorism?

If it’s about democracy, then don’t they remember? Mere 20 days after Capitol Hill Riots in US, that was deemed an “insurrection” and for which President Trump was impeached by warmonger Democrats, Bharat too, suffered an insurrection, on 26^th January 2021, when undemocratic left wing unions in cahoots with khalistani terrorists, and all of them masquerading as “farmers”, ran riot in entire Delhi and besieged Red Fort, trying to crush policemen, looking for PM Modi. On a day we celebrate our entire constitution, not just one part or another (like elections, as was the case with Capitol Hill Riots), so it was bigger in both symbolism and scale, than Capitol Hill riots when it comes to framing such crisis in “democracy in danger” lens.

But nope, not a peep anywhere.

So its not about democracy.

And by that extension, its naturally not about “Rule-of-Law.”

It’s about recolonizing Global South and exterminate the worst of them, us, the Hindus of Bharat – through a whole-of-the-world approach of which providing safe-havens and refuge to anti-Bharat, anti-Hindu terrorists is merely yet another part, another scheme, because of the institutionalized monotheistic culture of Abrahmo Leftists – both religious and secular.

That’s what it always was… And that’s what it always will be.