Whitewashing Islamic terrorism is a favourite hobby of Congress and its INDI alliance partners. They would stoop to the level of inventing lies to give Islamic terrorism a free pass. Sharad Pawar had invented a mythical bomb blast at the Muslim-dominated Masjid Bunder area during the 1993 serial bomb blasts. He dared to justify his lie by saying he did so to ‘promote Hindu-Muslim unity.’
Beed tourist is an INDI alliance worker
The Pahalgam terror attack has not only shaken the conscience of the country but also angered Hindus after several tourists confirmed that the terrorists inquired about their religion before killing them. Eyewitnesses confirmed that Hindus were selectively targeted and those who recited the Kalma (Islamic verses) were spared.
As the anger built up, the INDI alliance stepped in to provide cover fire. A video of a ‘tourist’ stressing the importance of Hindu-Muslim unity and ‘bhaichara’ is being widely circulated to claim that there is no ‘Islamic’ angle in the terror attack. The tourist appeals to ‘defeat divisive forces’ by visiting Kashmir. She adds that the locals are very friendly. She also refutes the claims being made by victims of Hindus being selectively targeted due to their religion.
The political identity of the so-called tourist was cleverly hidden. The ‘tourist’ from Maharashtra’s Beed, as seen in the video circulated by the INDI alliance supporters, is Pooja More-Jadhav. Her photographs with Rahul Gandhi during the latter’s Bharat ‘Jodo’ Yatra and Nationalist Congress Party (Pawar faction) Chief Sharad Pawar have emerged on social media. The main aim of the video is to give a clean chit to Islamic terrorism.
However, a few questions go begging. Since when was she there? Was Congress aware of the attack beforehand and placed this ‘tourist’ strategically to give bytes? Why is the INDI alliance and its supporters trying hard to refute the experiences of commoners?
INDI alliance & its ecosystem whitewashes Islamic terrorism
The INDI alliance has not just denied Islamic terrorism but has always tried to whitewash it. Sharad Pawar invented an extra bomb blast to give the terrorists a clean chit, although he claimed he did so to ensure ‘peace’ and water down the anger of Hindus. One cannot forget how the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government attempted to present the 26/11 terror attack as ‘RSS ki Saazish‘ (an RSS conspiracy). Unfortunately for UPA, Kasab was caught alive, and their plans fell apart.
UPA government made multiple attempts to raise the ‘Bhagwa terror’ bogey. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) gave Sadhvi Pragya a clean chit in the Malegaon case, which the UPA government attempted to use for their ‘Bhagwa terror’ propaganda. Last October, Congress leader Sushil Kumar Shinde, who was the Home Minister in the UPA government, admitted that adding ‘Atankwad’ as a suffix to ‘Bhagwa’ was a mistake. Although half-hearted, it
‘Saffron terrorism’ bogey was created not just to give Islamic terrorism a free run but also to gaslight Hindus. A similar attempt to whitewash Islamic terrorism is being made by the INDI alliance today. Despite being out of power, Congress and its allies have left no stone unturned to please their votebanks. For the INDI alliance, politics and not the lives of Hindus matter.
Typo fix:
Please read this sentence as corrected within ***
The evil parts in her not so ***un***common denial cum appeasement style is what she is omitting in her approach:
In a restricted sense Pooja More-Jadhav is correct too in implying that irrespective of religions, all should adopt and promote an amicable cooperative citizenship. It is a must.
The evil parts in her not so common denial cum appeasement style is what she is omitting in her approach:
1) Denial of ideology based terror ganging severely affecting our lives:
Here, the Mohammadan terror ecosystem is the most pressing thing needing containment and control. For instance, forget Pakistani Mohammadan terrorists in Kashmir, if you take for example, statistics of Jain persons marriying Muslim persons, then almost 100 percent of time either a Jain person converts to Islam or even if not outwardly rarely, their offsprings are always muslim. This is unlike what the statistics would be with other religions vs Jain marriages. This is not because of Jain dharm’s weakness.
Does skewed birth rates, large muslim migration to our country and related fake document support, open one sided conversion, recognition of “Muslim areas” where non-muslims must not be loud are some topics which automatically makes a person mentioning it “Islamophobic” and anti-muslim hater?
2) One sided guilt-shaming of Hindus, one sided accommodation by Hindus:
In everyday life and in religious festivals.
Does criticising animal tortures and murders on roads, housing areas and criticizing cattle robbery owned by poor Hindus, and other muslim specific criticisms “Islamophobic”? And conversly, mocking/criticising Hindus and their traditions, philosophies and festivals are “necessary” part of liberty and freedom of expression?
Let us see what if Pooja More-Jadhav ( or her any offspring if she is married) were to marry one of the friendly, large-hearted, moralistic and generous muslims she is so effusive in praise. Almost invariably she (or her offspring) would be either converting to Islam or offsprings from marriage would be Muslims only.
How much Pooja More-Jadhav realize the extremely cruel Jihadi treatment of Bangladeshi and West Bengal Hindus? Can she recall incidents on it? Has she ever talked about systematic decimaton of Hindus and their culture say from the time of independence? Or her reflexive behavior is to epouse moral equivalence or guilt-shame Hindus as a counter attack? What about Palestinians? And their tolerance for Hindus? What about Israelis? Bad? Even if they allow hundreds of mosques and large muslim population, without fear of conversion?
Ok, so Shared Pawar faked Mosque attack implying terrorism by Hindus. And that was an act to subjugate Hindus. Does Pooja More-Jadhav rationalize it as a Congress worker? Would she keep quite as she has probably done as secular person, if hypothetically someone did the same false narrative about Hindu temple? Or she would jump on it to criticize Hindus?