The political crisis in Uttarakhand has taken many turns, with the latest development being the SC putting a hold on Uttarakhand High Court’s order of last Thursday revoking President’s rule. “What has been happening is a very serious and grievous matter for any state…you don’t revoke President’s rule just like that. Everything has to be looked into…a balance has to be struck,” said the bench, expressing displeasure at the High Court for not releasing a written judgment.
Last week, the Uttarakhand High Court had brushed aside the Centre’s arguments on why it was forced to impose President’s rule in Uttarakhand after the incumbent Congress Government in the State failed to pass the finance bill on 18 March, and serious horse-trading allegations, including a video which shows Congress CM Harish Rawat trying to gain majority through bribery, emerged just before a floor test scheduled on 28 March.
Below are some of the interesting observations made by the bench of Uttarakhand Chief Justice K.M. Joseph and Justice V.K. Bist:
- When the AG representing the central Government said the court should not condone the illegal action of speaker on 18 March who denied division of votes thus allowing a minority government to stay afloat even though it had fallen as the appropriation bill had failed, the court remarked “all is fair in love and war”
- “The sting operation and conclusions derived from it are totally irrelevant.”
- “Hardly any government in India would last five minutes if allegations of corruption against it are sufficient for dissolving it.”
- “All over the country, it is happening where governments, which are obliged to resign, are shamelessly continuing”
- The court said that the government cannot say that the chief minister was trying to buy back his rebel MLAs while at the same time he was trying to get them disqualified.
- “Legitimacy of the President’s decision to suspend the Uttarakhand assembly is subject to judicial review as even he can go wrong.”
Sting video of Congress CM Harish Rawat trying to bribe rebel MLAs
In this video you can hear an MLA negotiating with Harish Rawat on the cash amount that rebel MLAs are asking for – the MLA asks for Rs. 25 crore for an MLA, to which Rawat says that he can’t give that much but he can give “ministerial posts through which the MLA can earn even more than 25 crore”.
SC pulls up HC
A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and Shiva Kirti Singh blocked the revival of the Harish Rawat-led Congress government while restoring President’s rule. The court also recorded the Centre’s undertaking that it would not revoke President’s rule until April 27, the next date of hearing, when it would also take a call on whether a floor test should be held on April 29 in accordance with the High Court order.
The SC bench commented, “There are a few matters of propriety. If the High Court had signed the judgment, we could have looked into it. For a party to take remedial action, a written order has to be there.”
The bench added, “The issue for us is on whether grounds of proclamation were justified and met the norms of (the S R) Bommai judgment.” It also commented: “Horse-trading creates a dent in the democracy.”
[…] not difficult to gauge. You only have to recall the undue delay in his elevation to the SC after he quashed Central rule imposed by the Modi government in Uttarakhand. This was in 2017 when he was the […]
[…] of Chief Justice K.M. Joseph and Justice V.K. Bist revoked the President’s rule with some interesting comments, to say the least […]
[…] has gained credence. Ex Uttarakhand Chief Justice KM Joseph created a constitutional crisis by revoking President’s rule in Uttarakhand recently, in spite of the fact that the ruling government was […]