(I’ll comment here in English for now.)
Hindu Sadhu/Sadhvi do a sincere and risky job when they are trying to protect beleaguered Hindus from relentless marauding Islamism that has not only partitioned our country into several Muslim only nation areas but inside Bharat too, we now have several huge and small areas that have become only “Muslim safe” areas and perilous to sincere Hindus. Administration, politicians berate Hindus or prevent them under excuse of law and order if they celebrate any festival or continue to organize religious processions in these “Muslim areas”. But cattle like unorganised mentality causes Hindus to be passive and fearful.

I think we need to think more and consult more Hindu scholars when coming up with demands, actions to protect Hindus. No doubt Sadhvi Prachi means well, but if these Sadhu/Sadhvis try to think a little more deeply than what just their knee jerk level instinctive level leads to, they will realize they are doing more disservice than service to besieged Hindus affected by Islamist and toxic Missionary Christian predators. For example, just think about being the term “non-Hindu”. Also have rational Hindu legal experts, historians, linguists etc. in your orbit for consultation and humility.

Although, given the Hindu peoples state of their mind and their dharms (especially in so called “Vedic/Sanatan” dharm), anybody can become Sadhu/Sadhvi in our country, an uncouth, ignorant Mohammadan or DMK model Dravidian can become a pujari/head of a Hindu temple, but for sincere and dedicated Sadhu/Sadhvis like Sadhvi Prachi this makes it even more critical to avoid shallowness and lack of depth in their thinking and pronouncement. I am sure, most Hindus would not even detect this in your “fatwa” and instead would rush to put me down.