spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
20.2 C
Sringeri
Saturday, June 28, 2025

AMU, Article 30, and the Supreme Court Judgement: Protecting identities or freezing them in time?

“AMU, Article 30, and the Supreme Court Judgement: Protecting identities or freezing them in time?”, Swarajyamag, December 23, 2024:

“The recent Supreme Court judgement on the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University may have turned majorly on the technicalities involved in the legal interpretation of terms in the Constitution.

This did not eliminate the role of background policy justifications for and against having a separate provision for minorities in the Constitution.

The majority view of the Chief Justice noted “the imperative to enable minorities to maintain their distinctive characteristics and fulfil their specific needs,” and at least one of the dissenting judges appealed to ‘national integrity’ while rejecting the claim of minority status…….”

Read the full article at Swarajyamag.com

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram &  YouTube. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Related Articles

Web Desk
Web Desk
Content from other publications, blogs and internet sources is reproduced under the head 'Web Desk'. Original source attribution and additional HinduPost commentary, if any, can be seen at the bottom of the article.Opinions expressed within these articles are those of the author and/or external sources. HinduPost does not bear any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any content or information provided.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Sign up to receive HinduPost content in your inbox
Select list(s):

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.