spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
0.3 C
Badrinath
Wednesday, November 29, 2023

SC wants to remove ‘colonial’ Sedition law, but have threats from internal and external forces reduced?

Firstly, I abhor this ‘colonial’ brand. The Supreme Court itself has interpreted the law and is no longer a ‘colonial law’. Supreme Court in the Kedar Nath Singh v State of Bihar held that the law is constitutionally valid.

Secondly, the bottom line is that a state should not suppress speech on the grounds of sedition- this is a fair concern, however, what constitutes free speech has to be considered through the test of reasonableness under Article 19(2).

I also believe that free speech solely cannot be a reason to judge the validity of the law. I believe that criticising the government and even the state is fair but the freedom to criticise should never include freedom to rebel against the country or call for dissolution of the state.

Thirdly, Sovereignty is to a state what freedom is to an individual and the State has the inherent right to defend its territorial integrity. Bharat faces serious threats from internal as well as external forces.

Bharat is a post-colonial state that is still transforming itself into a stable and powerful state. The existential threat of survival of Bharat doesn’t stem from extreme polarisation but the lived reality of the partition of Bharat.

The secessionists organisations working within Bharat and the financial and logistical support given to them from external enemies of Bharat are well founded. So the argument that Bharat doesn’t face any threats is wrong.

I am against indiscriminate usage of sedition law, which is not only unconstitutional but counterproductive as it trivialises the seriousness of such laws and also weakens the legitimate right of the state to defend its sovereignty.

We need to draw a line between free speech and national security. Proportionality and reasonableness is required.

(This article has been compiled from the tweet thread of Kartikey Misra @dyeus_pater)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram &  YouTube. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Related Articles

Web Desk
Web Desk
Content from other publications, blogs and internet sources is reproduced under the head 'Web Desk'. Original source attribution and additional HinduPost commentary, if any, can be seen at the bottom of the article. Opinions expressed within these articles are those of the author and/or external sources. HinduPost does not bear any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any content or information provided.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img

Latest Articles

Sign up to receive HinduPost content in your inbox
Select list(s):

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Thanks for Visiting Hindupost

Dear valued reader,
HinduPost.in has been your reliable source for news and perspectives vital to the Hindu community. We strive to amplify diverse voices and broaden understanding, but we can't do it alone. Keeping our platform free and high-quality requires resources. As a non-profit, we rely on reader contributions. Please consider donating to HinduPost.in. Any amount you give can make a real difference. It's simple - click on this button:
By supporting us, you invest in a platform dedicated to truth, understanding, and the voices of the Hindu community. Thank you for standing with us.