spot_img

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

spot_img
Hindu Post is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
20.4 C
Sringeri
Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Who caused the partition? Indian Muslims bred on Arab supremacist ideology & Hindu pacifism represented by Gandhi-Nehru

Pakistanis didn’t create Pakistan – Indians did! Shocked? This article will turn your core belief around its head with 19 simple factual verifiable logic.

You must have seen in your mixed faith college or location WhatsApp groups etc. It seeks to be ok to abuse or curse Pakistan. So somehow magically an artificial line drawn barely 75 years ago has somehow made all Muslims born on that side bad and this side of border good?

This is because Indians are non-confrontational and circular communicators unable to directly call out Arab supremacism as the core cause of discord and terror in the sub-continent. The best passive aggressive channel for them to vent their frustration is curse Pakistanis

But ask yourself a simple logical question – How exactly is a Pakistani different from Bharatiya ideologically/ theologically/ mental makeup other than birth location? Fundamental values and the theological values are same – so how exactly are they different from one another?

This whole concept of being “Pakistani” has no historic, geographic or cultural basis. So when we say did “Pakistanis” create Pakistan the question is more like did the people like West Punjabis, Sindhis, Balochis, Pashtuns and Bengalis of current day Pak create it?

For “harmony” (favorite word of secularists), the period between 1939 & 1947 when the final nail in the “harmony” coffin was struck, ‘distorians’ have deliberately kept the specifics hazy. All you were taught in school was we were all brothers and “British” created Pakistan.

Ever wondered then why did Turks/Arabs/Afghans from Bin Qasim, Mahmud Ghazni, Ghuri, Khilji. Babar, Aurangzeb, Tipu conducted Jihad against Bharatiya idolaters? British were still in their nappies being whacked by Vikings when Mahmud Ghazni was bulldozing temples in NW Bharat.

Ever wondered why in 1971, 3 million (80% casualty Hindus) were killed and why 1991 there was a Kashmir genocide if its purely the “British” that caused partition and riots? Last I know British were absent since 1947. Basically if there was one key events that conclusively paved way for partition it was the provincial elections of 1946.

Why? Because thus far it was purely theoretical. This was a democratic election with Jinnah’s league had “Pakistan” as poll promise and Gandhi-Nehru’s Congress had “United India”. The litmus test of common people’s choice

Look at the results . There used to be separate Muslim electorates in those times which makes the results even more statistically significant. The Muslim electorates in present day post partition Bharat voted overwhelmingly in favor of Jinnah and creation of Pakistan.

Muslims of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Bengal, odisha, Mumbai presidency and even madras presidency voted Jinnah overwhelmingly. Gandhi-Nehru had little or no support from Indian Muslims.

Jinnah entire support base and key leaders came from united provinces – now called Uttar Pradesh and Bengal. He himself was Gujarati. Aligarh Muslim University was its intellectual base, still inside Bharat. Deoband in UP was its theological base.

It was an Ashrafi upper caste Muslim movement lead from Uttar Pradesh supported by Pasmanda Muslims for street power. Hardly any league leader was actually from current day Pakistan. Sardar Patel himself said in a Calcutta speech that Indian Muslims caused partition.

Now the irony is that the biggest Muslim opposition to Pakistan came from areas currently in Pakistan. Allah Bux of Sindh and Khan Abdul Gafar Khan of NWFP. In fact NWFP was the only Muslim majority area where All India Muslim league did not win in the 1946 Provincial elections.

Secularists offer three explanations to this. 1) Princely states did not vote 2) Only 13% voters were eligible as British India did not have universal suffragette. 3) League had lost in 1939 so it was more of a temporary emotional state. All 3 points are logically wrong.

Princely states were predominantly Hindu. In the ones that were Muslims. Bahawalpur joined Pakistan. Hyderabad perpetrated Hindu genocide using Razakars till Indian army came in and integrated it. Kashmir we all know how it ended for Hindus.

Yes only 13% of voters (approx) were eligible but 90+ percent of 13% voting in one direction is statistically extremely significant of the broader mindset. League lost in 1939 not because Muslim votes went to Congress but because it got split between local Muslim parties.

Imagine partition caused 1 million deaths directly. It exterminated the Hindu-Sikh population in Pakistan Bangladesh and Kashmir where they had been living for generations. It created a hostile nuclear neighborhood and we don’t even know the cause.

Who caused partition? The answer is simple. Indian Muslims that accepted the Arab supremacist ideology and Hindu pacifism represented by Gandhi-Nehru. Instead of blaming Pakistan, Bharatiyas might need to understand its existential threat is more inside than outside!

(This article has been compiled from the tweet thread originally tweeted by Itihasika – Culture tutor (@itihasika) on October 31, 2022.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram &  YouTube. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Related Articles

Web Desk
Web Desk
Content from other publications, blogs and internet sources is reproduced under the head 'Web Desk'. Original source attribution and additional HinduPost commentary, if any, can be seen at the bottom of the article. Opinions expressed within these articles are those of the author and/or external sources. HinduPost does not bear any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any content or information provided.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Indian muslims are traitors voted for islamic Pak in 1946, but Gandhi Nehru Cong licked there boots to keep them in Bharat with minoritism secularism for vote banks, now these fellows don’t want NRC NRP UCC CAA but our political parties are appeasing them for votes?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Sign up to receive HinduPost content in your inbox
Select list(s):

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Thanks for Visiting Hindupost

Dear valued reader,
HinduPost.in has been your reliable source for news and perspectives vital to the Hindu community. We strive to amplify diverse voices and broaden understanding, but we can't do it alone. Keeping our platform free and high-quality requires resources. As a non-profit, we rely on reader contributions. Please consider donating to HinduPost.in. Any amount you give can make a real difference. It's simple - click on this button:
By supporting us, you invest in a platform dedicated to truth, understanding, and the voices of the Hindu community. Thank you for standing with us.