HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma

Will you help us hit our goal?

HinduPost is the voice of Hindus. Support us. Protect Dharma
31.1 C
Varanasi
Sunday, August 14, 2022

Dasharajanya – first epic war of Bharat

Wars have been a part of Bharat’s history since times immemorial. We are all familiar with the epic battles between good and evil, dharma and adharma, which took place during the Satya and Dwapar Yugas; namely Ramayana and Mahabharata.

By far, Mahabharata is considered to be the bloodiest and fiercest battle fought in the land of Bharat. However, an epic battle that pre-dates both these wars took place during the Vedic era. It wasn’t a battle merely for power or kingdom but one that defined the course of Bharat’s history and involved almost all the major dynasties of that time.

Bharat’s first Epic war

This war is epic in more ways than one, not just because of the Era it took place in but also because it spanned over several years during which many small battles were fought. This battle took place between Raja Sudas, descendent of Raja Bharat after whom our country is named, on the one side and a confederation of ten kings (Dasha meaning ten and Rajanya meaning kings) from whom the battle gets its name as Dasharajanya on the other side.

This battle finds mention in the hymns of Rigveda thereby gaining great significance. Rigveda is the oldest Vedic grantha and therefore a very significant source of information with respect to the Vedic age. Hymns 18, 19, 33, and 83 give information regarding this epic battle that spanned several years.

Background to the war: Sudas and his rivalry

Raja Sudas belonged to the Bharata clan (Puru-Trstu dynasty) and was a strong emperor who had established his supremacy in the Southeastern region of the Sapta-Sindhu River. He started expanding the kingdom inherited by him thereby alienating the neighboring kingdoms who waited for an opportunity to retaliate. This hostility laid the foundation for the Dasarajanya war. Some accounts also state that the rivalry between Maharishis Vishvamitra and Vashishta led to this war.

Whatever the reason, the fact remains that this war was fought in a series of battles, spread over a span of several years, between Sudas on the one side and a confederacy of ten dynasties or kings on the other side. The ten dynasties were Puru, Yadu, Turvasa, Adu, Druhyu, Alina, Paktha, Bhalanas, Siva, and Visanin.

The actual number exceeds ten and the others who fought on the side of the confederacy were Simyu, Vaikarna, Ajas, Sigrus, and Yakshus. The possibility of smaller chieftains and kingdoms lending their support to either side cannot be ruled out. While Maharishi Vashishta was on the side of Sudas, the confederacy had Maharishi Vishvamitra guiding them.

Notable battles

As mentioned earlier, the war itself comprised several battles. Two of the most important battles were fought on the eastern and western borders of the Bharata kingdom. The first battle took place on the banks of the Parushni River. This was a fiercely fought battle in which both sides tried to inflict losses on the other. Sudas ultimately succeeded in prevailing over his enemies and defeated the confederacy.

As soon as this battle ended, Sudas had to fight the Ajas, Sigrus, and Yakshus on the banks of the Yamuna River. Sudas emerged victorious in this war too and these three were also forced to pay revenue to him. As per the Rigveda, 6666 people were killed in this battle. Having won this war, Sudas gave rich gifts to his Guru Vashishta. Interestingly the last battle was also fought on the banks of Parushni.

Significance

This battle spanned several generations with loyalties being divided. Sudas single-handedly tackled his opponents to ultimately emerge victorious. This was more than just a war, it was politics at play. The twists and turns that preceded the war and that took place during the course of the war give us an idea of how politics operated.

As per legends Vishvamitra was earlier the Guru of Sudas but he was replaced by Vashishta later. Now the rivalry between the two Maharishis predated Sudas and the increasing closeness of Vashishta to the king only added fuel to Vishvamitra’s ego. The Maharishi is then said to have encouraged Sudas’ enemies to form a confederacy to defeat the former. Here’s another interesting fact: While Abhyavartin Chayamana of the Pruthu dynasty was an ally of the Bharatas, his descendent Kavi Chayamana fought against the Bharatas; that’s how divided the loyalties were.

This is a very significant event that occurred in the Vedic Age and therefore assumes the status of an Epic on par with Ramayana and Mahabharata. Itihasa has always been a part of Bharat’s scriptures but leftist historians have ignored it because they did not find it palatable that ancient Bharata could have kingdoms. Also, because Itihasa was a part of the scriptures they tended to be dismissed as ‘fiction’, or their meaning was taken out of context to present them like the West wanted it to be shown.

Many dynasties moved out of Bharat beyond the North-Western borders towards Persia (Iran) after the war. All these facts would not suit the “Aryan Invasion Theory” propagated by Western historians and continued by their Indian slave historians.

The significance of this war goes beyond the battlefield. It was not just a war but a consolidation of power by the Puru-Bharata dynasty in the North-Central region of Bharat. This region is very significant because many major dynasties had their capital here but more importantly, the Kuru dynasty belonged here and this was the site of Mahabharata. It shows how Sudas established his supremacy and it would be a great injustice to him if we ignore this tale that is truly epic in all sense of the term.

(Featured Image Source: Sanskriti Magazine)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram &  YouTube. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Related Articles

Maitri
Maitri
A opinionated girl-next-door with an attitude. I'm certainly not afraid to call myself 'a proud Hindu' and am positively politically incorrect. A Bharatiya at heart who loves reading, music, sports and nature. Travelling and writing are my passions.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Very well written article. Druhyus are still living in Lebanon and are known as Druze. Parsas went to Iran. The movement of the defeated kings was towards north and north-west. I mentioned this war in my book Portraits of a Nation- History of Ancient India- 2010. The coterie of communist historians and the Congress regimes took no notice of the book. It proved their mythical narrative wrong on every front- using evidence from various sciences. Hopefully, the new political dispensation will replace the anthropological spins. It is a surprise that in 8 years of BJP regime, the ICHR has produced not even a pamphlet – let alone a draft of the correct narrative. they are satisfied with their Padamshri and other awards. Besides being politically incorrect is unsettling for many.

    • Aabhar for reading and the compliment. I’ll definitely read the book. You are right, it is quite disturbing that students are still reading distorted History. Maybe you should write to the ICHR and the Education Minister.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Sign up to receive HinduPost content in your inbox
Select list(s):

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.