I make a clear difference between neochristian atheism and traditional pagan atheism.
Neochristian atheism consists in mocking ancestors and Gods with the early-Christian iconoclast anti-idolater paganophobic arguments that led to burn European culture.
Neochristian atheism is not simply the rejection of forced dogmatic beliefs, because paganism itself is of non-dogmatic nature, inclined to various schools, communities, and philosophical paths to follow.
Neochristian atheism is also the rejection of ancestors and the belief (assumed or not) that paganity is inferior to Christianity.
Their propaganda claims that obscurantism was not an organized system typical of the totalitarian Christian religious system, but something natural.
Neochristian atheism is the broomstick of christianity, the dishonest relativization of its crimes.
It’s easy for Christian missionaries on atheist cover to target people who could be interested in paganism, and lead them to think that pagan religions are also totalitarian evil.
Keeping people as atheists allows christianity to get them back far more easily than if they embraced the cause of their ethnocided ancestors, and today Hindus.
There is no return when you acknowledge what Christianity and Islam did to the pagan ancestors in Europe and the world.
Where are the white atheists who defend Hindus against the totalitarian harm of Chrislamism ? I don’t see them.
The fact is there is in most atheist spheres no recognition of the destruction of ancient cultures. The very notion of cultural ethnocide by conversion is wiped out.
Instead, they take the place of pagans with a narrative where they are the true victims of both Christianity and paganism.
They want to be the only victims and make forget the erasure of pagan cultures, so they don’t have to recognize the most destructive aspect of colonization.
Neochristian atheism is a way of avoiding to be held responsible for what colonial religions did, and at the same time keeping the privilege to show a profound disdain against “savage” indigenous pagan cultures they call “obscurantism”. It looks like Christian trolling, really.
Yet obscurantism is what Church did, not the normal nature of mankind.
They erase the obscurantist very special nature of christianity and islam by claiming 𝗮𝗹𝗹 religions are more or less obscurantist.
White atheism is the new cool way to call indigenous cultures “savagery”.
The biggest hinduphobic lies I ever heard from real-life persons were not coming from old-school Christians, but from these white atheists.
They want to believe in black legends about sati, virgin sacrifices, or castes so they can feel superior, more moral, and more intelligent.
Based on my experience and my deepest intimate conviction, neochristian atheism is a neocolonial faith to treat venerable indigenous cultures as savagery.
They say obscurantism instead of savagery, and present christianity as less stupid than any ancestral indigenous religion.
They are attacking me like : “You’re stupid because we never think about Hindus and don’t care about them.”
Nice shot in the foot, for that’s precisely what I’m saying.
They don’t care about Native Rights and only speak about indigenous cultures as savage obscurantist beliefs.