What is ‘Shrodinger’s Secular Idea of India.’?

Shrodinger’s Secular Idea of India is at once in love with P****stan, and hates P****stan. All at the same time.

Like that ‘Gollum!… Gollllumm!’ creature from the Lord of the Rings – but much worse.

It’s a national stockholm-syndrome on steroids.

Why?

Because by Seculars’ own definition of ‘Secular Idea of India’ and ‘What it means to be an Indian?’ they should be the fiercest critics of all things P****stan. Even more than Hindus!

But what do we see, in reality?

And before we answer that, let me remind everyone of a crucial thing: that its especially here, we need to take the whole apparatus into account. The entire “eco-system”, so to speak.

Why?

Because you never can judge a government’s politics by its own words alone. Especially the congressi one which thrives on its loyal darbari culture.

The charge for anything, is always led by its ideological warriors who may or may not be in the government, but even if they’re, they remain on lower-rungs – but mostly its the outside; the supposedly “independent” secular thought…created, engineered, cultivated and intellectualized as the very tip of the radical anti-Hindu spear, that informs – and more likely in Secular Abrahmo-Lefitst’s case, “forms” the public opinion in the direction the government actually – and already – wants to take.

In short, not just the government machinery but a whole-of-the-eco-system-approach, which needs to be taken into consideration here, to see and grasp ‘Secular Idea of India’s’ approach and vision about anything. Because an average govt. employee may work 9 to 5 but ‘Secular Idea of India’ is an evil that never sleeps. Perched atop its dark-tower fortress of mordor otherwise known as Khan-Market, its single, monotheist, evil-eye keeps watching the free Hindu people of Bharat. Hungrily. While its secular orcs work day and night, doing its bidding, to realize its vision of ruthless conquest called Gazwa-E-hind. For the fiery gaze it had set upon the free Hindu people’s homeland called Bharat.

So…

In the case of P****stan, what do we ‘see?’

By not just the successive congressi government’s anti-Bharat, anti-Hindu policies but from the Secular elites of Abrahmo-Leftist khan market gangs, too?

They keep fawning over P****stan and P****stanis!

You pick up anything by them, any forum…and they’re all swooning and salivating over it!

Especially the elites! On both sides of the border. (though, it must be said that at least P****stani Jihadi public is smarter than gullible secular Hindus in their ideological clarity, about what they want and will do to kaffir Hindus.)

For Abrahmo-Leftists, it’s all good when it comes to P****stan.

P****stani ‘art’,  P****stani ‘culture’, ‘P****stani ‘stars’,  P****stani ‘singers’,  P****stani ‘actors’, Pakistani ‘literature’,  P****stani ‘cuisine’, P****stani ‘Cricketers’ even P****stani ‘economy’ (until its reality became unable to fake anymore), P****stani ‘need to feel secure’, P****stani ‘media’, P****stani ‘TV serials’ and heck, even P****stani ‘memes’ – which are not necessarily making fun of them (remember the ‘pawry girl’ bloody stupid bimbo act forcefully made viral here, in Bharat, in which even urduwood jumped in to provide support.)

Naturally, all these P****stani things which Indian Seculars remain perpetually in awe of? They are – by default – By the Muslims, Of the Muslims and For the Muslims.

Not a shred of ‘secularism’ or even democracy anywhere!

Despite which, I’ve never seen Indian Seculars falling head over heels in love with some P****stani Hindu cultural icon or thing, vexing eloquent about it for decades… because by default, by definition, it’s just not possible. For a Hindu or Hindu cultural or religious person or even thing, to become prominent there. A fact that Indian Seculars smoothly paper over, regularly ignore and pretend complete innocence when asked about.

In fact, ‘the minority dissidents’ there – arguably the most cherished category for left-Liberals anywhere – those who oppose P****stani Jihadi policies and shows slightest possible pride in their Hindu culture or Bharat – are regularly derided and pilloried by so-called Secular Abrahmo-Leftists beating their chests about ‘Secular Idea of India’ 5 times a day, in Bharat, of all places!

Remember how Tarek Fatah was treated by oh-so-Secular-defenders-of-Idea-of-India.

Or how Danish Kaneria is being treated still.

Let me simplify this:

Do P****stanis have a Hindu SRK?

Or even a whole Hindu equivalent of Urduwood, as we know it to exist here, going so far as to be peddling all sorts of anti-Hindu agendas for decades?

No, right?

And these days, its not even sneaky infiltration of by-default-praise for all things P****stani, thats at play in elite Indian Secular circles anymore.

Even when any nationalist movie tries; even to display the slightest bit of pride in Bharat and shows P****stan its place; even if by virtue of nothing except a bit of smashing-hit textbook desi dilogue-bazi, even when its nothing but complete fiction! … the entire Secular Abrahmo-Leftists brigade would be out in the front – with paid anti-Hindu, anti-National reviewers and glamour-industry news media forming the very front-line, their faces contorted in disapproving frowns, pouting hard, wagging their fingers, mouthing “tch-tch”. Blasting off the movie-makers and the audience alike, about “useless jingoism”, “chest-thumping nationalism”, “crude propaganda” and that inevitable smack! Right on the back of collective Bharatiya heads! about how wrong, how unclassy, how unbecoming and uncivilized, and indeed, sometimes even ‘Un-Hindu’ and ‘In-Indian’ it is, do this “P****stan bashing.”

Examples are practically unlimited! Just for a starter-munch, chew on this here, here, here, here, here and here … about movies alone!

I mean…

Are you kidding me?

That’s the least we must all do!

But most of all, ‘Secular Idea of India’ defenders should be leading the charge, if they’re oh-so-against the Idea-of-Pakistan and two-nation theory.

And that’s just a bit of fiction.

Even in reality, the moment someone prominent (politician, celebrity, doesn’t matter… it even doesn’t matter whether they’re prominent or not, in the 1^st place; if they’re capable of making waves, they’re fair game) comes out with some kind of anti-P****stan remark, on any issue – and is cheered-on by the vast majority of Bharatiya people, that’s the moment the whole khan-market gang of elite Abrahmo-Lefitst brigade defending ‘Secular Idea of India’ would immediately rush to the battlefield… and start doing its covering fire thing for P****stan. With secular ‘intellectual class’ in particular rooting especially hard for the Jihadi terroristan, giving it a safe-refuge – among ample loads of other, utter bullc**p, in examples like here, here, here and here.

Their faces contorted in disapproving frowns, pouting hard, wagging their fingers, mouthing “tch-tch”.

About how wrong, how unclassy, how unbecoming and uncivilized, and indeed, ‘Un-Hindu’ and ‘In-Indian’ it is, to do this “P****stan bashing.”

Q&A session:

When any chances of talks stalled due to Modi government’s tough-on-terror policy, saying, ‘terror and talks cannot go hand in hand,’ bizarrely enough, for even this common-sensical initiative designed solely to protect Bharatiya citizens, they criticized us – and keep criticizing us! Muftis and Abdullahs and all the Abrahmo-Leftist Seculars… they keep asking and pressuring, for us to give up this policy, to re-establish full-diplomatic relations and start talking (largely non-sense) to our sworn enemy!

It’s as if they’d not rest, until a significant number of Bharatiya citizens – mostly Hindus, have re-started doing their ‘Hindu – not Hindutva!’ sacred civic duty of becoming shrapnel-studded red boquet from Jihadi terrorists. Again. That until Islamist terrorists have their heart’s fill of kaffir Hindu blood, ‘Secular Idea of India’ wouldn’t be complete.

In fact…

1. They keep asking us Bharatiyas, to resume talks with that Jihadi P****stan.
2. They keep asking us Bharatiyas, to re-establish and restart cricketing and other sports with Jihadi P****stan (while remaining completely silent about the entire west’s boycott, even in international sporting events, of Russian athletes, and they’d absolutely won’t talk about how rich it’ll make Jihadi P****stan)
3. They keep asking us Bharatiyas, to allow the vastly anti-Hindu, anti-National urduwood their re-hiring and re-platforming of P****stani artists. Whether its actors, singers, models, painters, writers doesn’t matter.
4. They keep asking us Bharatiyas, to restart bilateral “trade” with Jihadi P****stan (not mentioning, once again, how we’d be funding our own Bharatiya citizen’s death that way. That we’d be buying-and-selling, Hindu blood. By enriching the Jihadi anti-Hindu hate factory.)

They keep asking us Bharatiyas, all these things and many more…

But I’ve never heard anyone of these self-proclaimed Seculars and Abrahmo-Lefitsts, who’re supposed to be bearing the sole responsibility to defend the ‘Secular Idea of India’ – that was in express opposition to ‘Idea of Pakistan’, too – asking, any of these P****stani personalities, eminences and interests, about what they think of:

1.) ‘Secular Idea of India.’

2.) ‘Jihadi Separatist Idea of anti-Hindu P****stan’

and 3.) Whether they condemn it and disown their P****stani identity? And camapign for adopting ‘Secular Idea of India’ in P****stan.

Nope.

That never happens.

In fact…when you think about it:

None of these ostensible defenders of ‘Secular Idea of India’ – that was in express opposition to ‘Idea of Pakistan’ and its poisonous ‘Two-Nation Theory’ – have ever asked, to pre-condition any bilateral, nation-to-nation talks, not just people-to-people, on any matter, until P****stan abandons its ‘Two-Nation theory’ and accepts, formally, the ‘Secular Idea of India’ as their own.

Never.

So little is their faith, their commitment, to their own ‘Secular Idea of India’ – especially against its arch-nemesis.

Because what are they afraid of? We are talking about the ‘Secular Idea of India’, aren’t we? The shrill, screeching and quite pointless cacophony about which has become the hall-mark of national (or anti-national?), alleged ‘Secular’ political culture, right?

Saving it from fascist Hindutva BJP is paramount, isn’t it?

If it is inseparable from the Idea of P****stan, and its two-nation theory – and if you listen to Tharoors, Seculars, Jihadis, Missionaries, anti-Nationals and all anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat brown-sahebs, it certainly is – then why not have the courage to ask the obvious questions regarding its glaring inconsistencies, continuing for nearly 8 decades!

Not to just to P****stanis but to all of us.

If so-called ‘Secular Idea of India’ was against two-nation theory of P****stan, and is so, so important then:

1.) Why did it, and its OG designers under Nehru, formally accepted the two-nation theory and the partitioning of Bharat?

And

2.) After independence, with the prized ability and “freedom” to choose our fates, our national ideas, Why did they formally “recognize” P****stan as an Independent, Sovereign, Islamic State, founded purely on religion? According it “Secular legitimacy from Bharat”?

And finally,

3.) Why did they, in the past – and their ideological descendants today, still keep batting for it, WITHOUT insisting on P****stan changing its fundamental nature. It’s commitment to ‘Two-Nation Theory?’

Why?

But perhaps the most important question of all – in a peripherally important way, that is, must be:

Why do they immediately resort to their own, specific version of “P****stan bashing,” when we Hindus make a demand for Hindu Rashtra?

Their secular jibes of “So you want Hindu-P****stan for yourself?”

I mean… I can’t even begin to stress, just how totally stupid it sounds!

Because how can it be Hindu-P****stan, when Hindu Dharma itself predates the birth of P****stan, and indeed, the very faith to which P****stan has dedicated its stolen goods and territory.

Scientifically, it is at least, 4,600 years older.

Spiritually, perhaps older by crores of years. And yugs and Kalpas.

How is restoring what we always were, relates even the slightest bit to a modern abomination that’s Jihadi P****stan?

It doesn’t make sense.

But that’s not even the main-point here.

Anytime this talk of “Hindu-Rashtra” is raised in Bharat by Hindus, the loud lamentations of Secular Abrahmo-Leftists about alleged “P****stanizaton of our tolerant, inclusive, syncretic culture” and death of “Secular India” gets so shrill, you’d have to see a doctor for blasted ear-drums.

But, with the “Original sin against Secular Idea of India”; the real Jihadi monster; the original model of two-nation theory… it, and its decidedly non-secular Muslim elites, and even street-level anti-Hindu separatist Jihadi thugs, they are not just easily accepted, accorded formal “recognition” but also elevated to some kind of demi-god status, by none other than our ‘Secular defenders of Secular Idea of India’ itself!

“Pakistan-Bashing” becomes a national “Secular” crime in Bharat!

It’s like they not only want to normalize “P****stan”, in Bharat, of all places, but they want to deify it!

The oh-so-righteousness of P****stanis! In everything they do – or don’t do… it’s unquestionable! They’re right everywhere! Every-time!

I mean, if Oxford dictionary had a proper synonym for “unlimited awesomeness”, it’d be the “P****stan” and “P****stani agendas” and “P****stanis following P****stani agendas.” Least that’s what Secular Abrahmo-Leftists edition would say – which I’m sure there is, Cambridge and Oxford being the preferred choice of our colonizers and their brown-sahebs, not to mention the epic-center of learning – and getting a PhD and possibly even a Royal Fellowship for – how-to-be-treacherous-with-Marxist-subversives, since last century, at the very least. (Any insinuation or connection to Prince Pappu is absolutely not intended!)

I mean…how come no-one other than me noticed this before?

This plainly obvious thing.

• In “Secular Idea of India” – self-declared arch-nemesis of “P****stani founding Idea:the Two-Nation Theory” – Muslims have the 1^st right on national resources here.
• In the practical outcome of this “Two-Nation Theory”, which is today known as P****stan, Muslims also have 1^st right on national resources, over there.

I mean… it’s really a head-scratcher for me since… I don’t know when, but it is. This perplexing question bouncing around in my head, almost tearing it apart in an epic confusion:

What’s the difference between the two then?

In their effective bottom-lines?

If, after the British left, the “political entity they created, united it as India” – according to Seculars, that is – if all of it has a ruling principle like “Muslims have the 1^st right on national resources.” then how is it really different than… I don’t know, Mughals? Or any other foreign Jihadi invader’s empire? At least in principle?

Whether they’re a majority or minority in any nation of Bharatiya subcontinent, if they are, always, the 1^st claimants on national resources… then who really is the 2^nd class citizen here? And at the risk of becoming even worse? And have been worse?

It never made sense and it doesn’t still.

So these secular jibes of “So you want Hindu-P****stan for yourself?” … boss, when your own Secular icons, the OG Secular Idea of India creators, if they formally accepted two-nation theory and formally “recognized” its practical outcome: a religion based nation, formed on our stolen territory and made of our stolen people – rechristened as a Sovereign, Independent, “Islamic State” of P****stan…when they bent the knee before the original sin against Secular Idea of India, then, who are you? And with what moral authority you got the gall, to tell us, the Hindus, who’d been enslaved and colonized for 1200 years by foreign invaders – the two of which are the very reason for partition – about how to move forward with our country – Or what’s left of it.

No. Really. What moral ground is left there for Seculars? If ever there was one, to begin with?

Because if the argument, if the core, founding principle for a “Secular Idea of India” is “We won’t accept a nation with State-religion” then, it seems:

• “Secular Idea of India” had no moral compunction, no trouble at all, in formally “recognizing” a dozen or so officially Christian nations that were already there.
• “Secular Idea of India” had no moral compunction, no trouble at all, in formally “recognizing” even more numbers of official Muslim nations that were already there.
• “Secular Idea of India” initially did cite itself, and squirmed about the only official Jewish nation, but ultimately, 4 decades later, it even formally “recognized” that.
• But the worst of all, “Secular Idea of India”, from the very start – it didn’t even happen decades later, after lots of geo-political hassling, No. From the very start! – it had no moral-compunction, no trouble at all, had absolutely no nagging conscience, weighing down heavily on its Secular soul, about formally “recognizing” even its own arch-nemesis. Accepting it with damn near open arms. Against which it was expressly created.
• But apparently… “Secular Idea of India”, gets into an absolute moral-crisis – heavens fall and a tsunami of burning lava crashes over the boundaries of democracy and turns everything good about “India” into ash! – when it comes to Hindus demanding a country of their own, that is also…. tring, tring, hello? their homeland! Always had been. Bharat being the nation from river Sindhu to the Seas where their Dharma and culture was born and flourished. Where most of our tirthkshetras are.

This also matters because…

• Islam had retained control of the region containing its most of the holiest sites.
• Christianity created a whole new nation for itself, for their holiest Vatican!
• Even Judaism, being nothing more than 0.2% of total population of the world and once ethnically cleansed of it, got their homeland back, in Israel! After thousands of years!
• That means All Abrahmic religions.
• But oh, the tragedy for Hindu Dharma! Even after losing the cradle of our civilization and seeing it Islamized before its own eyes; even while its followers become 1 billion in number, the 3^rd largest faith on this earth, and still remain a majority its own homeland…Hindu Dharma remains, still, a Stateless refugee in its own country of origin.

(To be continued…)